Identifying Japanese mothers of infants and toddlers at risk of parenting isolation: A validation study of cutoff scores and associated psychosocial measures

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING
Hikaru Honda, Masahiro Ishii, Toshiko Kita, Montakarn Chuemchit
{"title":"Identifying Japanese mothers of infants and toddlers at risk of parenting isolation: A validation study of cutoff scores and associated psychosocial measures","authors":"Hikaru Honda,&nbsp;Masahiro Ishii,&nbsp;Toshiko Kita,&nbsp;Montakarn Chuemchit","doi":"10.1111/jjns.70063","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aims</h3>\n \n <p>To determine a cutoff score for the Social Connectivity of Mothers with People in the Community Scale (SCMPCS) and revalidate the scale using additional psychosocial indicators.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A cross-sectional analysis used baseline data from one arm of a randomized trial including 259 mothers with children under 3 years of age in Sapporo City, Japan. Reliability and structural validity were reassessed using Cronbach's alpha and confirmatory factor analysis. Parenting isolation was operationally defined as the absence of support from informal, community-based, and formal sources and used as the reference classification for ROC analysis. Predictive validity was examined using logistic regression adjusted for maternal age, educational attainment, daycare use, and perceived economic status. Criterion-related validity was evaluated using Mann–Whitney U tests.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The SCMPCS showed good internal consistency (α = 0.85) and acceptable model fit (CFI = 0.90, RMSEA = 0.073). ROC analysis identified a cutoff of 30 or lower with moderate discriminatory ability (AUC = 0.73; sensitivity = 0.92; specificity = 0.50). Mothers at or below the cutoff had higher odds of meeting the operational reference classification of parenting isolation (OR = 11.94, 95% CI: 2.74–52.03) and reported lower self-efficacy and capacity to receive support, greater loneliness, and poorer well-being.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>The SCMPCS demonstrated stable psychometric performance, and the validated cutoff may support broad preventive screening to identify mothers who may need further assessment and early follow-up. Rather than serving as a diagnostic threshold, this cutoff may help maternal and child health services provide timely preventive support.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":50265,"journal":{"name":"Japan Journal of Nursing Science","volume":"23 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Japan Journal of Nursing Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jjns.70063","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims

To determine a cutoff score for the Social Connectivity of Mothers with People in the Community Scale (SCMPCS) and revalidate the scale using additional psychosocial indicators.

Methods

A cross-sectional analysis used baseline data from one arm of a randomized trial including 259 mothers with children under 3 years of age in Sapporo City, Japan. Reliability and structural validity were reassessed using Cronbach's alpha and confirmatory factor analysis. Parenting isolation was operationally defined as the absence of support from informal, community-based, and formal sources and used as the reference classification for ROC analysis. Predictive validity was examined using logistic regression adjusted for maternal age, educational attainment, daycare use, and perceived economic status. Criterion-related validity was evaluated using Mann–Whitney U tests.

Results

The SCMPCS showed good internal consistency (α = 0.85) and acceptable model fit (CFI = 0.90, RMSEA = 0.073). ROC analysis identified a cutoff of 30 or lower with moderate discriminatory ability (AUC = 0.73; sensitivity = 0.92; specificity = 0.50). Mothers at or below the cutoff had higher odds of meeting the operational reference classification of parenting isolation (OR = 11.94, 95% CI: 2.74–52.03) and reported lower self-efficacy and capacity to receive support, greater loneliness, and poorer well-being.

Conclusions

The SCMPCS demonstrated stable psychometric performance, and the validated cutoff may support broad preventive screening to identify mothers who may need further assessment and early follow-up. Rather than serving as a diagnostic threshold, this cutoff may help maternal and child health services provide timely preventive support.

识别有育儿孤立风险的日本婴幼儿母亲:一项关于截止分数和相关社会心理测量的验证研究。
目的:确定母亲与社区中的人的社会联系量表(SCMPCS)的截止分数,并使用其他社会心理指标重新验证量表。方法:横断面分析使用来自日本札幌市的一项随机试验的基线数据,该试验包括259名3岁以下儿童的母亲。采用Cronbach's α和验证性因子分析重新评估信度和结构效度。父母隔离在操作上被定义为缺乏来自非正式、社区和正式来源的支持,并作为ROC分析的参考分类。采用逻辑回归对母亲年龄、受教育程度、日托使用和感知经济状况进行调整,检验预测效度。使用Mann-Whitney U检验评估标准相关效度。结果:SCMPCS具有良好的内部一致性(α = 0.85)和良好的模型拟合(CFI = 0.90, RMSEA = 0.073)。ROC分析发现截断值为30或更低,具有中等区分能力(AUC = 0.73;敏感性= 0.92;特异性= 0.50)。处于或低于临界值的母亲满足育儿隔离的操作参考分类的几率更高(or = 11.94, 95% CI: 2.74-52.03),自我效能感和接受支持的能力较低,孤独感更强,幸福感更差。结论:SCMPCS表现出稳定的心理测量性能,有效的临界值可能支持广泛的预防性筛查,以识别可能需要进一步评估和早期随访的母亲。这一分界点可能有助于妇幼保健服务机构提供及时的预防性支持,而不是作为诊断门槛。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
55
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Japan Journal of Nursing Science is the official English language journal of the Japan Academy of Nursing Science. The purpose of the Journal is to provide a mechanism to share knowledge related to improving health care and promoting the development of nursing. The Journal seeks original manuscripts reporting scholarly work on the art and science of nursing. Original articles may be empirical and qualitative studies, review articles, methodological articles, brief reports, case studies and letters to the Editor. Please see Instructions for Authors for detailed authorship qualification requirement.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书