Digital health technology burden and frustration among patients with multimorbidity.

IF 7.1 2区 医学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS
Haoxin Chen, Jiancheng Ye
{"title":"Digital health technology burden and frustration among patients with multimorbidity.","authors":"Haoxin Chen, Jiancheng Ye","doi":"10.1093/jamia/ocag090","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to characterize patterns of digital health technology (DHT) use and examine the relationships between multimorbidity, DHT adoption, and user-reported frustration, with a focus on identifying socioeconomic and phenotypic determinants of digital health burden.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A cross-sectional analysis was conducted using nationally representative public data from Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS) 7. Adults with at least one chronic condition were included (N = 3753). The outcomes were the number of DHTs used and frustration with digital tools. Multivariable logistic regression models were employed, adjusting for sociodemographic and clinical variables. Phenotypic subgroup analyses were conducted based on multimorbidity, DHT use, and frustration patterns.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 3753 participants, 46.9% had multimorbidity. Participants with multimorbidity reported using a greater number of DHTs on average (mean = 3.9 vs 3.6, P < .001) compared to those with a single condition, yet exhibited significantly higher rates of frustration with digital tasks (61.2% vs 54.1%, P < .001). Both higher income and educational groups were associated with lower odds of frustration. Greater DHT use was also independently associated with reduced frustration (OR = 0.78, 95% CI: 0.71-0.87, P < .01). Phenotypic subgroup analysis further identified individuals with multimorbidity and low DHT versatility as the most vulnerable profile, characterized by older age, lower socioeconomic status, and the highest frustration prevalence (60.3%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>While individuals with multimorbidity use more DHTs, they experience greater frustration, particularly those with lower socioeconomic status. However, higher engagement with DHTs (as measured by number of technology types adopted) is associated with lower frustration, suggesting that technology proficiency may mitigate burden. Targeted, equity-conscious interventions, including competency-based digital literacy programs, simplified user-centered design, and structural supports addressing device access and connectivity, are needed to reduce digital health burden and improve outcomes for patients living with multiple chronic conditions.</p>","PeriodicalId":50016,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association","volume":" ","pages":"1852-1865"},"PeriodicalIF":7.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13630286/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocag090","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: This study aimed to characterize patterns of digital health technology (DHT) use and examine the relationships between multimorbidity, DHT adoption, and user-reported frustration, with a focus on identifying socioeconomic and phenotypic determinants of digital health burden.

Materials and methods: A cross-sectional analysis was conducted using nationally representative public data from Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS) 7. Adults with at least one chronic condition were included (N = 3753). The outcomes were the number of DHTs used and frustration with digital tools. Multivariable logistic regression models were employed, adjusting for sociodemographic and clinical variables. Phenotypic subgroup analyses were conducted based on multimorbidity, DHT use, and frustration patterns.

Results: Among 3753 participants, 46.9% had multimorbidity. Participants with multimorbidity reported using a greater number of DHTs on average (mean = 3.9 vs 3.6, P < .001) compared to those with a single condition, yet exhibited significantly higher rates of frustration with digital tasks (61.2% vs 54.1%, P < .001). Both higher income and educational groups were associated with lower odds of frustration. Greater DHT use was also independently associated with reduced frustration (OR = 0.78, 95% CI: 0.71-0.87, P < .01). Phenotypic subgroup analysis further identified individuals with multimorbidity and low DHT versatility as the most vulnerable profile, characterized by older age, lower socioeconomic status, and the highest frustration prevalence (60.3%).

Conclusion: While individuals with multimorbidity use more DHTs, they experience greater frustration, particularly those with lower socioeconomic status. However, higher engagement with DHTs (as measured by number of technology types adopted) is associated with lower frustration, suggesting that technology proficiency may mitigate burden. Targeted, equity-conscious interventions, including competency-based digital literacy programs, simplified user-centered design, and structural supports addressing device access and connectivity, are needed to reduce digital health burden and improve outcomes for patients living with multiple chronic conditions.

多重疾病患者的数字卫生技术负担和挫败感。
目的:本研究旨在表征数字健康技术(DHT)使用模式,并研究多发病、DHT采用和用户报告的挫败感之间的关系,重点是确定数字健康负担的社会经济和表型决定因素。材料和方法:采用卫生信息全国趋势调查(HINTS) 7中具有全国代表性的公共数据进行横断面分析。至少有一种慢性疾病的成年人被纳入研究(N = 3753)。结果是使用dht的数量和对数字工具的挫败感。采用多变量logistic回归模型,调整社会人口统计学和临床变量。表型亚组分析基于多发病、DHT使用和挫折模式。结果:在3753名参与者中,46.9%的人患有多重疾病。多重疾病的参与者报告使用更多的dht(平均= 3.9 vs 3.6),结论:虽然多重疾病的个体使用更多的dht,但他们感到更大的挫折感,特别是那些社会经济地位较低的人。然而,较高的dht参与度(通过采用的技术类型数量来衡量)与较低的挫折感相关,这表明技术熟练程度可能减轻负担。有针对性的、注重公平的干预措施,包括基于能力的数字扫盲计划、简化的以用户为中心的设计,以及解决设备访问和连接问题的结构支持,都需要减少数字健康负担,改善患有多种慢性疾病的患者的预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 医学-计算机:跨学科应用
CiteScore
14.50
自引率
7.80%
发文量
230
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: JAMIA is AMIA''s premier peer-reviewed journal for biomedical and health informatics. Covering the full spectrum of activities in the field, JAMIA includes informatics articles in the areas of clinical care, clinical research, translational science, implementation science, imaging, education, consumer health, public health, and policy. JAMIA''s articles describe innovative informatics research and systems that help to advance biomedical science and to promote health. Case reports, perspectives and reviews also help readers stay connected with the most important informatics developments in implementation, policy and education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书