Effect of use of ambient listening technology on patient-reported communication and satisfaction ratings.

IF 7.1 2区 医学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS
Sandra L Taylor, Debbie Aizenberg, Melissa Jost, Yunyi Ren, Courtney R Lyles, Jason Y Adams
{"title":"Effect of use of ambient listening technology on patient-reported communication and satisfaction ratings.","authors":"Sandra L Taylor, Debbie Aizenberg, Melissa Jost, Yunyi Ren, Courtney R Lyles, Jason Y Adams","doi":"10.1093/jamia/ocag103","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Evaluate the impact of ambient listening AI scribe technology for drafting notes on patient-reported communication and satisfaction ratings of their physician during ambulatory visits.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We conducted a pilot (April-August 2024) during which 31 physicians across multiple specialties could use an AI scribe during ambulatory visits. Patient surveys from AI-scribe supported visits were compared with pre-pilot surveys in the previous 12 months, and to 125 control physicians, following a difference-in-differences approach. Logistic regression evaluated change in the odds of receiving the highest score for 5 questions, focused on patient ratings of communication (4 items) and overall satisfaction with their physician (1 item).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 31 917 surveys (7164 pilot; 24 753 control), patient ratings were high. The pre-post change in communication and satisfaction scores did not differ significantly between pilot and control physicians. However, for 3 questions (concern provider showed, explanation provider gave, and likelihood of recommending their provider), ratings increased for pilot physicians while declining for controls without reaching statistical significance.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>We did not find evidence of AI scribes worsening or enhancing patient experiences. Continued evaluation is warranted to ensure positive patient experiences as AI tools expand in clinical care.</p>","PeriodicalId":50016,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association","volume":" ","pages":"1780-1784"},"PeriodicalIF":7.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13580746/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocag103","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Evaluate the impact of ambient listening AI scribe technology for drafting notes on patient-reported communication and satisfaction ratings of their physician during ambulatory visits.

Materials and methods: We conducted a pilot (April-August 2024) during which 31 physicians across multiple specialties could use an AI scribe during ambulatory visits. Patient surveys from AI-scribe supported visits were compared with pre-pilot surveys in the previous 12 months, and to 125 control physicians, following a difference-in-differences approach. Logistic regression evaluated change in the odds of receiving the highest score for 5 questions, focused on patient ratings of communication (4 items) and overall satisfaction with their physician (1 item).

Results: Among 31 917 surveys (7164 pilot; 24 753 control), patient ratings were high. The pre-post change in communication and satisfaction scores did not differ significantly between pilot and control physicians. However, for 3 questions (concern provider showed, explanation provider gave, and likelihood of recommending their provider), ratings increased for pilot physicians while declining for controls without reaching statistical significance.

Discussion: We did not find evidence of AI scribes worsening or enhancing patient experiences. Continued evaluation is warranted to ensure positive patient experiences as AI tools expand in clinical care.

使用环境聆听技术对患者报告的沟通和满意度评分的影响。
目的:评估环境聆听AI抄写技术在门诊期间对患者报告的沟通和医生满意度评分的影响。材料和方法:我们进行了一项试点(2024年4月至8月),在此期间,31名来自多个专业的医生可以在门诊就诊时使用人工智能抄写器。采用差异中的差异方法,将AI-scribe支持访问的患者调查与前12个月的预试点调查和125名对照医生进行比较。Logistic回归评估了5个问题获得最高分的几率变化,重点关注患者对沟通的评分(4项)和对医生的总体满意度(1项)。结果:31 917份调查中(试点7164份,对照组24 753份),患者评分较高。飞行员和对照组医生在沟通和满意度得分的前后变化无显著差异。然而,对于3个问题(担忧提供者表现,解释提供者给出,推荐他们的提供者的可能性),试点医生的评分增加,而对照组的评分下降,但没有达到统计学意义。讨论:我们没有发现人工智能抄写员恶化或增强患者体验的证据。随着人工智能工具在临床护理中的扩展,有必要继续进行评估,以确保积极的患者体验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 医学-计算机:跨学科应用
CiteScore
14.50
自引率
7.80%
发文量
230
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: JAMIA is AMIA''s premier peer-reviewed journal for biomedical and health informatics. Covering the full spectrum of activities in the field, JAMIA includes informatics articles in the areas of clinical care, clinical research, translational science, implementation science, imaging, education, consumer health, public health, and policy. JAMIA''s articles describe innovative informatics research and systems that help to advance biomedical science and to promote health. Case reports, perspectives and reviews also help readers stay connected with the most important informatics developments in implementation, policy and education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书