Sandra L Taylor, Debbie Aizenberg, Melissa Jost, Yunyi Ren, Courtney R Lyles, Jason Y Adams
{"title":"Effect of use of ambient listening technology on patient-reported communication and satisfaction ratings.","authors":"Sandra L Taylor, Debbie Aizenberg, Melissa Jost, Yunyi Ren, Courtney R Lyles, Jason Y Adams","doi":"10.1093/jamia/ocag103","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Evaluate the impact of ambient listening AI scribe technology for drafting notes on patient-reported communication and satisfaction ratings of their physician during ambulatory visits.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We conducted a pilot (April-August 2024) during which 31 physicians across multiple specialties could use an AI scribe during ambulatory visits. Patient surveys from AI-scribe supported visits were compared with pre-pilot surveys in the previous 12 months, and to 125 control physicians, following a difference-in-differences approach. Logistic regression evaluated change in the odds of receiving the highest score for 5 questions, focused on patient ratings of communication (4 items) and overall satisfaction with their physician (1 item).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 31 917 surveys (7164 pilot; 24 753 control), patient ratings were high. The pre-post change in communication and satisfaction scores did not differ significantly between pilot and control physicians. However, for 3 questions (concern provider showed, explanation provider gave, and likelihood of recommending their provider), ratings increased for pilot physicians while declining for controls without reaching statistical significance.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>We did not find evidence of AI scribes worsening or enhancing patient experiences. Continued evaluation is warranted to ensure positive patient experiences as AI tools expand in clinical care.</p>","PeriodicalId":50016,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association","volume":" ","pages":"1780-1784"},"PeriodicalIF":7.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13580746/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocag103","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives: Evaluate the impact of ambient listening AI scribe technology for drafting notes on patient-reported communication and satisfaction ratings of their physician during ambulatory visits.
Materials and methods: We conducted a pilot (April-August 2024) during which 31 physicians across multiple specialties could use an AI scribe during ambulatory visits. Patient surveys from AI-scribe supported visits were compared with pre-pilot surveys in the previous 12 months, and to 125 control physicians, following a difference-in-differences approach. Logistic regression evaluated change in the odds of receiving the highest score for 5 questions, focused on patient ratings of communication (4 items) and overall satisfaction with their physician (1 item).
Results: Among 31 917 surveys (7164 pilot; 24 753 control), patient ratings were high. The pre-post change in communication and satisfaction scores did not differ significantly between pilot and control physicians. However, for 3 questions (concern provider showed, explanation provider gave, and likelihood of recommending their provider), ratings increased for pilot physicians while declining for controls without reaching statistical significance.
Discussion: We did not find evidence of AI scribes worsening or enhancing patient experiences. Continued evaluation is warranted to ensure positive patient experiences as AI tools expand in clinical care.
期刊介绍:
JAMIA is AMIA''s premier peer-reviewed journal for biomedical and health informatics. Covering the full spectrum of activities in the field, JAMIA includes informatics articles in the areas of clinical care, clinical research, translational science, implementation science, imaging, education, consumer health, public health, and policy. JAMIA''s articles describe innovative informatics research and systems that help to advance biomedical science and to promote health. Case reports, perspectives and reviews also help readers stay connected with the most important informatics developments in implementation, policy and education.