Effects of Home-Based Exercise With Telehealth Guidance in Lymphoma Survivors Entering Cardio-Oncology Rehabilitation: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

IF 3.1 4区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Cancer Control Pub Date : 2026-01-01 Epub Date: 2026-06-23 DOI:10.1177/10732748261455980
Katerina Chamradova, Ladislav Batalik, Petr Winnige, Filip Dosbaba, Martin Hartman, Marian Felsoci, Garyfallia Pepera, Jing Su
{"title":"Effects of Home-Based Exercise With Telehealth Guidance in Lymphoma Survivors Entering Cardio-Oncology Rehabilitation: A Randomized Controlled Trial.","authors":"Katerina Chamradova, Ladislav Batalik, Petr Winnige, Filip Dosbaba, Martin Hartman, Marian Felsoci, Garyfallia Pepera, Jing Su","doi":"10.1177/10732748261455980","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>IntroductionLymphoma survivors are at increased cardiovascular risk due to cardiotoxic therapies and commonly experience reduced cardiorespiratory fitness and quality of life. Telehealth-supported home-based exercise (HBE) may extend access to cardio-oncology rehabilitation (CORE); however, evidence from randomized trials in lymphoma survivors remains limited. This trial compared the short-term effects of telehealth-supported HBE versus center-based exercise (CBE) in lymphoma survivors entering CORE.Materials and MethodsIn this single-center, single-blind, parallel-group randomized controlled trial, lymphoma survivors in remission were randomized 1:1 to a 12-week telehealth-supported HBE program or supervised CBE. The primary endpoint was cardiorespiratory fitness, operationalized as peak oxygen uptake (pVO<sub>2</sub>, mL·kg<sup>-1</sup>·min<sup>-1</sup>) assessed by cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) at 12 weeks. Key secondary outcomes were maximal workload (W) and SF-36 Physical Functioning. Between-group effects were estimated using ANCOVA with baseline adjustment (intention-to-treat; missing outcomes handled by multiple imputation).ResultsEighty participants were randomized (HBE n=40; CBE n=40); post-intervention CPET outcomes were available for 69 participants (HBE n=34; CBE n=35). pVO<sub>2</sub> improved in both groups, with no significant baseline-adjusted between-group difference at 12 weeks (adjusted mean difference HBE-CBE -0.60 mL·kg<sup>-1</sup>·min<sup>-1</sup>, 95% CI -2.38 to 1.17; p=0.504). No between-group differences were observed for maximal workload (2.05 W, 95% CI -9.20 to 13.30; p=0.721) or SF-36 Physical Functioning (1.69 points, 95% CI -3.37 to 6.74; p=0.512). Adherence was high in both groups (HBE 80.1% vs CBE 77.9%). No adverse events were reported. Costs per participant were CZK 13,032 for HBE versus CZK 24,900 for CBE (48% lower for HBE).ConclusionTelehealth-supported HBE achieved comparable short-term improvements in exercise capacity and physical functioning to supervised CBE among lymphoma survivors entering CORE, with high adherence, no reported adverse events, and substantially lower provider costs. Telehealth-guided HBE represents a pragmatic, lower-cost delivery option to expand access to CORE.</p>","PeriodicalId":49093,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Control","volume":"33 ","pages":"10732748261455980"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13305522/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer Control","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10732748261455980","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/6/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

IntroductionLymphoma survivors are at increased cardiovascular risk due to cardiotoxic therapies and commonly experience reduced cardiorespiratory fitness and quality of life. Telehealth-supported home-based exercise (HBE) may extend access to cardio-oncology rehabilitation (CORE); however, evidence from randomized trials in lymphoma survivors remains limited. This trial compared the short-term effects of telehealth-supported HBE versus center-based exercise (CBE) in lymphoma survivors entering CORE.Materials and MethodsIn this single-center, single-blind, parallel-group randomized controlled trial, lymphoma survivors in remission were randomized 1:1 to a 12-week telehealth-supported HBE program or supervised CBE. The primary endpoint was cardiorespiratory fitness, operationalized as peak oxygen uptake (pVO2, mL·kg-1·min-1) assessed by cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) at 12 weeks. Key secondary outcomes were maximal workload (W) and SF-36 Physical Functioning. Between-group effects were estimated using ANCOVA with baseline adjustment (intention-to-treat; missing outcomes handled by multiple imputation).ResultsEighty participants were randomized (HBE n=40; CBE n=40); post-intervention CPET outcomes were available for 69 participants (HBE n=34; CBE n=35). pVO2 improved in both groups, with no significant baseline-adjusted between-group difference at 12 weeks (adjusted mean difference HBE-CBE -0.60 mL·kg-1·min-1, 95% CI -2.38 to 1.17; p=0.504). No between-group differences were observed for maximal workload (2.05 W, 95% CI -9.20 to 13.30; p=0.721) or SF-36 Physical Functioning (1.69 points, 95% CI -3.37 to 6.74; p=0.512). Adherence was high in both groups (HBE 80.1% vs CBE 77.9%). No adverse events were reported. Costs per participant were CZK 13,032 for HBE versus CZK 24,900 for CBE (48% lower for HBE).ConclusionTelehealth-supported HBE achieved comparable short-term improvements in exercise capacity and physical functioning to supervised CBE among lymphoma survivors entering CORE, with high adherence, no reported adverse events, and substantially lower provider costs. Telehealth-guided HBE represents a pragmatic, lower-cost delivery option to expand access to CORE.

远程医疗指导下家庭运动对进入心脏肿瘤康复的淋巴瘤幸存者的影响:一项随机对照试验。
由于心脏毒性治疗,淋巴瘤幸存者心血管风险增加,并且通常经历心肺功能和生活质量下降。远程医疗支持的家庭锻炼(HBE)可以扩大获得心脏肿瘤学康复(CORE);然而,来自淋巴瘤幸存者的随机试验的证据仍然有限。该试验比较了远程医疗支持的HBE与中心运动(CBE)在进入CORE的淋巴瘤幸存者中的短期效果。材料和方法在这项单中心、单盲、平行组随机对照试验中,缓解期淋巴瘤幸存者按1:1随机分为12周远程医疗支持的HBE项目或监督CBE。主要终点是心肺健康,在12周时通过心肺运动试验(CPET)评估峰值摄氧量(pVO2, mL·kg-1·min-1)。主要的次要结果是最大工作量(W)和SF-36身体功能。使用基线调整的ANCOVA估计组间效应(意向治疗;多重输入处理的缺失结果)。结果随机选取80例受试者(HBE n=40, CBE n=40);69名参与者的干预后CPET结果可用(HBE n=34; CBE n=35)。两组的pVO2均有改善,12周时经基线调整后的组间差异无统计学意义(调整后的平均差异HBE-CBE -0.60 mL·kg-1·min-1, 95% CI -2.38 ~ 1.17; p=0.504)。最大工作量(2.05 W, 95% CI -9.20至13.30;p=0.721)或SF-36身体功能(1.69分,95% CI -3.37至6.74;p=0.512)组间无差异。两组的依从性都很高(HBE为80.1%,CBE为77.9%)。无不良事件报告。HBE的人均成本为13,032捷克克朗,而CBE的人均成本为24,900捷克克朗(HBE低48%)。结论:在进入CORE的淋巴瘤幸存者中,远程医疗支持的HBE在运动能力和身体功能方面取得了与监督CBE相当的短期改善,具有高依从性,无不良事件报告,并且大大降低了提供者成本。远程保健指导下的HBE是扩大核心保健服务可及性的一种务实、低成本的提供选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cancer Control
Cancer Control ONCOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
148
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Cancer Control is a JCR-ranked, peer-reviewed open access journal whose mission is to advance the prevention, detection, diagnosis, treatment, and palliative care of cancer by enabling researchers, doctors, policymakers, and other healthcare professionals to freely share research along the cancer control continuum. Our vision is a world where gold-standard cancer care is the norm, not the exception.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书