Katerina Chamradova, Ladislav Batalik, Petr Winnige, Filip Dosbaba, Martin Hartman, Marian Felsoci, Garyfallia Pepera, Jing Su
{"title":"Effects of Home-Based Exercise With Telehealth Guidance in Lymphoma Survivors Entering Cardio-Oncology Rehabilitation: A Randomized Controlled Trial.","authors":"Katerina Chamradova, Ladislav Batalik, Petr Winnige, Filip Dosbaba, Martin Hartman, Marian Felsoci, Garyfallia Pepera, Jing Su","doi":"10.1177/10732748261455980","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>IntroductionLymphoma survivors are at increased cardiovascular risk due to cardiotoxic therapies and commonly experience reduced cardiorespiratory fitness and quality of life. Telehealth-supported home-based exercise (HBE) may extend access to cardio-oncology rehabilitation (CORE); however, evidence from randomized trials in lymphoma survivors remains limited. This trial compared the short-term effects of telehealth-supported HBE versus center-based exercise (CBE) in lymphoma survivors entering CORE.Materials and MethodsIn this single-center, single-blind, parallel-group randomized controlled trial, lymphoma survivors in remission were randomized 1:1 to a 12-week telehealth-supported HBE program or supervised CBE. The primary endpoint was cardiorespiratory fitness, operationalized as peak oxygen uptake (pVO<sub>2</sub>, mL·kg<sup>-1</sup>·min<sup>-1</sup>) assessed by cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) at 12 weeks. Key secondary outcomes were maximal workload (W) and SF-36 Physical Functioning. Between-group effects were estimated using ANCOVA with baseline adjustment (intention-to-treat; missing outcomes handled by multiple imputation).ResultsEighty participants were randomized (HBE n=40; CBE n=40); post-intervention CPET outcomes were available for 69 participants (HBE n=34; CBE n=35). pVO<sub>2</sub> improved in both groups, with no significant baseline-adjusted between-group difference at 12 weeks (adjusted mean difference HBE-CBE -0.60 mL·kg<sup>-1</sup>·min<sup>-1</sup>, 95% CI -2.38 to 1.17; p=0.504). No between-group differences were observed for maximal workload (2.05 W, 95% CI -9.20 to 13.30; p=0.721) or SF-36 Physical Functioning (1.69 points, 95% CI -3.37 to 6.74; p=0.512). Adherence was high in both groups (HBE 80.1% vs CBE 77.9%). No adverse events were reported. Costs per participant were CZK 13,032 for HBE versus CZK 24,900 for CBE (48% lower for HBE).ConclusionTelehealth-supported HBE achieved comparable short-term improvements in exercise capacity and physical functioning to supervised CBE among lymphoma survivors entering CORE, with high adherence, no reported adverse events, and substantially lower provider costs. Telehealth-guided HBE represents a pragmatic, lower-cost delivery option to expand access to CORE.</p>","PeriodicalId":49093,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Control","volume":"33 ","pages":"10732748261455980"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13305522/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer Control","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10732748261455980","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/6/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
IntroductionLymphoma survivors are at increased cardiovascular risk due to cardiotoxic therapies and commonly experience reduced cardiorespiratory fitness and quality of life. Telehealth-supported home-based exercise (HBE) may extend access to cardio-oncology rehabilitation (CORE); however, evidence from randomized trials in lymphoma survivors remains limited. This trial compared the short-term effects of telehealth-supported HBE versus center-based exercise (CBE) in lymphoma survivors entering CORE.Materials and MethodsIn this single-center, single-blind, parallel-group randomized controlled trial, lymphoma survivors in remission were randomized 1:1 to a 12-week telehealth-supported HBE program or supervised CBE. The primary endpoint was cardiorespiratory fitness, operationalized as peak oxygen uptake (pVO2, mL·kg-1·min-1) assessed by cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) at 12 weeks. Key secondary outcomes were maximal workload (W) and SF-36 Physical Functioning. Between-group effects were estimated using ANCOVA with baseline adjustment (intention-to-treat; missing outcomes handled by multiple imputation).ResultsEighty participants were randomized (HBE n=40; CBE n=40); post-intervention CPET outcomes were available for 69 participants (HBE n=34; CBE n=35). pVO2 improved in both groups, with no significant baseline-adjusted between-group difference at 12 weeks (adjusted mean difference HBE-CBE -0.60 mL·kg-1·min-1, 95% CI -2.38 to 1.17; p=0.504). No between-group differences were observed for maximal workload (2.05 W, 95% CI -9.20 to 13.30; p=0.721) or SF-36 Physical Functioning (1.69 points, 95% CI -3.37 to 6.74; p=0.512). Adherence was high in both groups (HBE 80.1% vs CBE 77.9%). No adverse events were reported. Costs per participant were CZK 13,032 for HBE versus CZK 24,900 for CBE (48% lower for HBE).ConclusionTelehealth-supported HBE achieved comparable short-term improvements in exercise capacity and physical functioning to supervised CBE among lymphoma survivors entering CORE, with high adherence, no reported adverse events, and substantially lower provider costs. Telehealth-guided HBE represents a pragmatic, lower-cost delivery option to expand access to CORE.
期刊介绍:
Cancer Control is a JCR-ranked, peer-reviewed open access journal whose mission is to advance the prevention, detection, diagnosis, treatment, and palliative care of cancer by enabling researchers, doctors, policymakers, and other healthcare professionals to freely share research along the cancer control continuum. Our vision is a world where gold-standard cancer care is the norm, not the exception.