Development and feasibility testing of a conversational chatbot supporting genetic education and testing for hereditary cancer.

IF 1.8 Q4 GENETICS & HEREDITY
Samuel Tundealao, Emily Heidt, Sherry Grumet, Marc D Schwartz, Beth N Peshkin, Jinghua An, Scott T Walters, Lindsay O'Boyle, Deborah Toppmeyer, Anita Y Kinney
{"title":"Development and feasibility testing of a conversational chatbot supporting genetic education and testing for hereditary cancer.","authors":"Samuel Tundealao, Emily Heidt, Sherry Grumet, Marc D Schwartz, Beth N Peshkin, Jinghua An, Scott T Walters, Lindsay O'Boyle, Deborah Toppmeyer, Anita Y Kinney","doi":"10.1007/s12687-026-00873-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study describes the development and feasibility testing of a digital health guide (DHG) to streamline genetic education, reduce barriers, and promote informed genetic testing (GT) decisions among cancer survivors. This study reports on the DHG's development, usability testing, acceptability, feasibility, and preliminary efficacy in improving genetic counseling (GC) and GT access for cancer survivors. Guided by the Ottawa Decision Support Framework, the DHG prototype was developed following community engagement with cancer patients and at-risk relatives from diverse sociodemographically backgrounds. It was refined through user (content-focused) and usability (functionality-focused) testing. Pilot trial participants provided data through semi-structured interviews and usability assessments. Qualitative data were analyzed using the Framework Method. The preliminary impact of the DHG on GC and GT uptake, and informed decision-making, was assessed in a feasibility and accessibility trial. The Chatbot Usability Questionnaire score for the DHG was 70.3 (IQR = 12.5), indicating good acceptability. The DHG also facilitated GT uptake (73.3%) compared to enhanced usual care (EUC; 7.7%). Pretest GC was requested by 1 of 13 patients in the EUC arm, while no request (0 of 15 patients) was made in the DHG arm. Users' feedback led to clearer language, improved navigation, and stronger messaging regarding data security. DHG participants had lower decisional conflict (33.37 ± 21.09) and decision regret (17.5 ± 16.50) than those in the EUC arm (53.25 ± 22.66 and 37.08 ± 17.38, respectively). The digital intervention is feasible, acceptable, and a promising strategy for expanding GT access and promoting informed decision-making. Further testing in a definitive randomized controlled trial is warranted. Clinical trial registration. This study was preregistered at the NIH clinical trial registry ( https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06184867 ).</p>","PeriodicalId":46965,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Community Genetics","volume":"17 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13287281/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Community Genetics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12687-026-00873-z","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study describes the development and feasibility testing of a digital health guide (DHG) to streamline genetic education, reduce barriers, and promote informed genetic testing (GT) decisions among cancer survivors. This study reports on the DHG's development, usability testing, acceptability, feasibility, and preliminary efficacy in improving genetic counseling (GC) and GT access for cancer survivors. Guided by the Ottawa Decision Support Framework, the DHG prototype was developed following community engagement with cancer patients and at-risk relatives from diverse sociodemographically backgrounds. It was refined through user (content-focused) and usability (functionality-focused) testing. Pilot trial participants provided data through semi-structured interviews and usability assessments. Qualitative data were analyzed using the Framework Method. The preliminary impact of the DHG on GC and GT uptake, and informed decision-making, was assessed in a feasibility and accessibility trial. The Chatbot Usability Questionnaire score for the DHG was 70.3 (IQR = 12.5), indicating good acceptability. The DHG also facilitated GT uptake (73.3%) compared to enhanced usual care (EUC; 7.7%). Pretest GC was requested by 1 of 13 patients in the EUC arm, while no request (0 of 15 patients) was made in the DHG arm. Users' feedback led to clearer language, improved navigation, and stronger messaging regarding data security. DHG participants had lower decisional conflict (33.37 ± 21.09) and decision regret (17.5 ± 16.50) than those in the EUC arm (53.25 ± 22.66 and 37.08 ± 17.38, respectively). The digital intervention is feasible, acceptable, and a promising strategy for expanding GT access and promoting informed decision-making. Further testing in a definitive randomized controlled trial is warranted. Clinical trial registration. This study was preregistered at the NIH clinical trial registry ( https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06184867 ).

支持遗传教育和遗传性癌症检测的会话聊天机器人的开发和可行性测试。
本研究描述了数字健康指南(DHG)的开发和可行性测试,以简化遗传教育,减少障碍,并促进癌症幸存者中知情的基因检测(GT)决定。本研究报告了DHG的开发、可用性测试、可接受性、可行性以及在改善癌症幸存者遗传咨询(GC)和GT获取方面的初步效果。在渥太华决策支持框架的指导下,DHG原型是在与来自不同社会人口背景的癌症患者和高危亲属进行社区参与后开发的。它是通过用户(以内容为中心)和可用性(以功能为中心)测试来完善的。试点试验参与者通过半结构化访谈和可用性评估提供数据。采用框架法对定性数据进行分析。在可行性和可及性试验中评估了DHG对GC和GT吸收以及知情决策的初步影响。聊天机器人可用性问卷的DHG得分为70.3 (IQR = 12.5),表明可接受性较好。与强化常规护理(EUC; 7.7%)相比,DHG也促进了GT的吸收(73.3%)。EUC组13例患者中有1例要求进行预测GC,而DHG组15例患者中0例未要求进行预测GC。用户的反馈导致了更清晰的语言,改进的导航,以及关于数据安全的更强的消息传递。DHG组的决策冲突(33.37±21.09)和决策后悔(17.5±16.50)分别低于EUC组(53.25±22.66和37.08±17.38)。数字干预是可行的、可接受的,也是一种很有前景的策略,可以扩大GT获取和促进知情决策。有必要在一项明确的随机对照试验中进行进一步的测试。临床试验注册。本研究在NIH临床试验注册中心(https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06184867)进行了预注册。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Community Genetics
Journal of Community Genetics GENETICS & HEREDITY-
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
5.30%
发文量
54
期刊介绍: The Journal of Community Genetics is an international forum for research in the ever-expanding field of community genetics, the art and science of applying medical genetics to human communities for the benefit of their individuals. Community genetics comprises all activities which identify persons at increased genetic risk and has an interest in assessing this risk, in order to enable those at risk to make informed decisions. Community genetics services thus encompass such activities as genetic screening, registration of genetic conditions in the population, routine preconceptional and prenatal genetic consultations, public education on genetic issues, and public debate on related ethical issues. The Journal of Community Genetics has a multidisciplinary scope. It covers medical genetics, epidemiology, genetics in primary care, public health aspects of genetics, and ethical, legal, social and economic issues. Its intention is to serve as a forum for community genetics worldwide, with a focus on low- and middle-income countries. The journal features original research papers, reviews, short communications, program reports, news, and correspondence. Program reports describe illustrative projects in the field of community genetics, e.g., design and progress of an educational program or the protocol and achievement of a gene bank. Case reports describing individual patients are not accepted.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书