Implicit Sequence Learning in Children With Reading Difficulties: Dyslexia Versus Low Intellectual Functioning

IF 1.6 3区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION, SPECIAL
Dyslexia Pub Date : 2026-06-22 DOI:10.1002/dys.70038
Joaquín M. M. Vaquero, Ian C. Simpson, Sylvia Defior, Gracia Jiménez-Fernández
{"title":"Implicit Sequence Learning in Children With Reading Difficulties: Dyslexia Versus Low Intellectual Functioning","authors":"Joaquín M. M. Vaquero,&nbsp;Ian C. Simpson,&nbsp;Sylvia Defior,&nbsp;Gracia Jiménez-Fernández","doi":"10.1002/dys.70038","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Dyslexia refers to difficulties in acquiring fluent reading in the absence of an intellectual deficit. In the current study, we addressed two controversial issues surrounding this disorder. Firstly, the hypothesis of an implicit learning impairment that could contribute to the development of dyslexia, and secondly, the need to distinguish reading difficulties according to IQ, the so-called discrepancy definition between reading ability and expected ability. Of relevance, it has been suggested that implicit learning is relatively independent of IQ in comparison to explicit/strategic learning. Consequently, we compared implicit sequence learning in children (8–9 years old) with dyslexia, poor readers associated with low intellectual functioning (LIF), and typically developing children (TD). Both the Dyslexia and LIF groups learned less than the TD group. Therefore, the Dyslexia group's performance supports the hypothesis of an implicit learning deficit in this population. However, the poor learning shown by the LIF group challenges the necessity of a discrepancy definition for dyslexia (poor reading despite average IQ). This paper argues that implicit learning may influence the severity of reading difficulties rather than act as a causal factor and highlights the need for further research on the usefulness of distinguishing reading difficulties based on LIF.</p>","PeriodicalId":47222,"journal":{"name":"Dyslexia","volume":"32 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/dys.70038","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dyslexia","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/dys.70038","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Dyslexia refers to difficulties in acquiring fluent reading in the absence of an intellectual deficit. In the current study, we addressed two controversial issues surrounding this disorder. Firstly, the hypothesis of an implicit learning impairment that could contribute to the development of dyslexia, and secondly, the need to distinguish reading difficulties according to IQ, the so-called discrepancy definition between reading ability and expected ability. Of relevance, it has been suggested that implicit learning is relatively independent of IQ in comparison to explicit/strategic learning. Consequently, we compared implicit sequence learning in children (8–9 years old) with dyslexia, poor readers associated with low intellectual functioning (LIF), and typically developing children (TD). Both the Dyslexia and LIF groups learned less than the TD group. Therefore, the Dyslexia group's performance supports the hypothesis of an implicit learning deficit in this population. However, the poor learning shown by the LIF group challenges the necessity of a discrepancy definition for dyslexia (poor reading despite average IQ). This paper argues that implicit learning may influence the severity of reading difficulties rather than act as a causal factor and highlights the need for further research on the usefulness of distinguishing reading difficulties based on LIF.

Abstract Image

阅读困难儿童的内隐顺序学习:阅读障碍与低智力功能。
阅读障碍是指在没有智力缺陷的情况下,难以获得流利的阅读。在目前的研究中,我们解决了围绕这种疾病的两个有争议的问题。首先,内隐学习障碍的假设可能有助于阅读障碍的发展,其次,需要根据智商来区分阅读困难,即所谓的阅读能力与预期能力之间的差异定义。与此相关的是,与外显/策略学习相比,内隐学习相对独立于智商。因此,我们比较了阅读障碍儿童(8-9岁)、低智力功能阅读障碍儿童(LIF)和正常发育儿童(TD)的内隐顺序学习。诵读困难组和阅读障碍组都比阅读障碍组学得少。因此,失读症组的表现支持了该人群存在内隐学习缺陷的假设。然而,LIF小组显示的学习能力差挑战了对阅读障碍(尽管智商平均,但阅读能力差)的差异定义的必要性。本文认为内隐学习可能会影响阅读困难的严重程度,而不是作为一个因果因素,并强调需要进一步研究基于内隐学习识别阅读困难的有用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Dyslexia
Dyslexia Multiple-
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
9.10%
发文量
27
期刊介绍: DYSLEXIA provides reviews and reports of research, assessment and intervention practice. In many fields of enquiry theoretical advances often occur in response to practical needs; and a central aim of the journal is to bring together researchers and practitioners in the field of dyslexia, so that each can learn from the other. Interesting developments, both theoretical and practical, are being reported in many different countries: DYSLEXIA is a forum in which a knowledge of these developments can be shared by readers in all parts of the world. The scope of the journal includes relevant aspects of Cognitive, Educational, Developmental and Clinical Psychology Child and Adult Special Education and Remedial Education Therapy and Counselling Neuroscience, Psychiatry and General Medicine The scope of the journal includes relevant aspects of: - Cognitive, Educational, Developmental and Clinical Psychology - Child and Adult Special Education and Remedial Education - Therapy and Counselling - Neuroscience, Psychiatry and General Medicine
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书