{"title":"Access, Equity and Ethical Challenges in Assisted Reproductive Technologies in India: An Empirical Bioethics Analysis.","authors":"Aiswarya Acharya, Rubi Talukdar, Pramit Chandra Rout, Susanta Kumar Pradhan","doi":"10.1007/s10728-026-00583-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Assisted reproductive technologies (ART) have expanded rapidly in India, raising significant ethical and distributive justice concerns relating to accessibility, affordability and reproductive healthcare governance. Despite growing scholarly attention to ART regulation, empirical evidence examining public perceptions of access, perceived equity barriers and ethical governance within the Indian context remains limited. This study addresses this gap through an empirical bioethics analysis of public perceptions regarding ART accessibility and governance in India. A cross-sectional survey of 560 respondents from urban, semi-urban and rural settings was conducted using a structured questionnaire. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics, reliability analysis, correlation analysis and one-way ANOVA with Tukey post hoc comparisons. The findings reveal significant geographic disparities in access to ART services, with urban respondents reporting substantially greater access than semi-urban and rural respondents (F = 35.040, p < 0.001). Descriptive findings further indicate moderate levels of awareness and regulatory trust alongside lower perceptions of access and greater perceived equity barriers. The study highlights the continuing influence of structural inequality on reproductive healthcare accessibility in India and underscores the need for policy interventions aimed at improving equitable access, institutional accountability and inclusive reproductive healthcare governance.</p>","PeriodicalId":46740,"journal":{"name":"Health Care Analysis","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Care Analysis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10728-026-00583-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ETHICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Assisted reproductive technologies (ART) have expanded rapidly in India, raising significant ethical and distributive justice concerns relating to accessibility, affordability and reproductive healthcare governance. Despite growing scholarly attention to ART regulation, empirical evidence examining public perceptions of access, perceived equity barriers and ethical governance within the Indian context remains limited. This study addresses this gap through an empirical bioethics analysis of public perceptions regarding ART accessibility and governance in India. A cross-sectional survey of 560 respondents from urban, semi-urban and rural settings was conducted using a structured questionnaire. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics, reliability analysis, correlation analysis and one-way ANOVA with Tukey post hoc comparisons. The findings reveal significant geographic disparities in access to ART services, with urban respondents reporting substantially greater access than semi-urban and rural respondents (F = 35.040, p < 0.001). Descriptive findings further indicate moderate levels of awareness and regulatory trust alongside lower perceptions of access and greater perceived equity barriers. The study highlights the continuing influence of structural inequality on reproductive healthcare accessibility in India and underscores the need for policy interventions aimed at improving equitable access, institutional accountability and inclusive reproductive healthcare governance.
辅助生殖技术(ART)在印度迅速扩大,引起了与可及性、可负担性和生殖保健治理有关的重大伦理和分配正义问题。尽管越来越多的学者关注抗逆转录病毒治疗的监管,但在印度背景下,检验公众对获取、感知到的公平障碍和道德治理的看法的经验证据仍然有限。本研究通过对印度公众对抗逆转录病毒治疗可及性和治理的看法进行实证生物伦理学分析,解决了这一差距。使用结构化问卷对来自城市、半城市和农村的560名受访者进行了横断面调查。数据分析采用描述性统计、信度分析、相关分析和单因素方差分析。调查结果显示,在获得抗逆转录病毒治疗服务方面存在显著的地域差异,城市受访者报告的获得抗逆转录病毒治疗服务的机会大大高于半城市和农村受访者(F = 35.040, p
期刊介绍:
Health Care Analysis is a journal that promotes dialogue and debate about conceptual and normative issues related to health and health care, including health systems, healthcare provision, health law, public policy and health, professional health practice, health services organization and decision-making, and health-related education at all levels of clinical medicine, public health and global health. Health Care Analysis seeks to support the conversation between philosophy and policy, in particular illustrating the importance of conceptual and normative analysis to health policy, practice and research. As such, papers accepted for publication are likely to analyse philosophical questions related to health, health care or health policy that focus on one or more of the following: aims or ends, theories, frameworks, concepts, principles, values or ideology. All styles of theoretical analysis are welcome providing that they illuminate conceptual or normative issues and encourage debate between those interested in health, philosophy and policy. Papers must be rigorous, but should strive for accessibility – with care being taken to ensure that their arguments and implications are plain to a broad academic and international audience. In addition to purely theoretical papers, papers grounded in empirical research or case-studies are very welcome so long as they explore the conceptual or normative implications of such work. Authors are encouraged, where possible, to have regard to the social contexts of the issues they are discussing, and all authors should ensure that they indicate the ‘real world’ implications of their work. Health Care Analysis publishes contributions from philosophers, lawyers, social scientists, healthcare educators, healthcare professionals and administrators, and other health-related academics and policy analysts.