Perioperative Management of Patients using GLP-1 Receptor Agonists Current Evidence, Risks, and Practical Recommendations-A Narrative Review.

IF 1.2 Q3 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Uğur Serkan Çitilcioğlu, Hatice Kaya Özdoğan
{"title":"Perioperative Management of Patients using GLP-1 Receptor Agonists Current Evidence, Risks, and Practical Recommendations-A Narrative Review.","authors":"Uğur Serkan Çitilcioğlu, Hatice Kaya Özdoğan","doi":"10.4274/TJAR.2026.262459","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) and dual glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide GLP-1 RAs are increasingly prescribed for diabetes and obesity, leading to a growing number of surgical patients receiving these agents. Their ability to delay gastric emptying has raised concerns about residual gastric contents (RGCs) and potential aspiration during anaesthesia. Available evidence from mechanistic studies, clinical investigations, and case reports indicates that GLP-1-based therapies consistently impair solid-phase gastric emptying and may increase RGC, particularly during early treatment and dose escalation, with effects that can persist despite standard fasting and short-term drug interruption. Although clinically apparent aspiration events remain uncommon, multiple reports have described perioperative regurgitation or unexpected solid gastric contents at induction. Early guidance favoured routine preoperative drug interruption; however, more recent multisociety recommendations increasingly support continuation of therapy in most asymptomatic patients and endorse enhanced perioperative mitigation strategies, such as dietary modification, strict adherence to fasting, selective use of point-of-care gastric ultrasound, preference for regional anaesthesia when feasible, and tailored airway management. Overall, current data support an individualised, risk-adapted approach rather than uniform interruption of GLP-1 therapy. Continuation of structured mitigation appears reasonable for many patients, whereas heightened caution and full-stomach precautions remain appropriate in higher-risk situations. Further prospective studies are required to define true perioperative aspiration risk and to establish evidence-based management pathways.</p>","PeriodicalId":23353,"journal":{"name":"Turkish journal of anaesthesiology and reanimation","volume":" ","pages":"150-160"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13308581/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Turkish journal of anaesthesiology and reanimation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4274/TJAR.2026.262459","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/6/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) and dual glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide GLP-1 RAs are increasingly prescribed for diabetes and obesity, leading to a growing number of surgical patients receiving these agents. Their ability to delay gastric emptying has raised concerns about residual gastric contents (RGCs) and potential aspiration during anaesthesia. Available evidence from mechanistic studies, clinical investigations, and case reports indicates that GLP-1-based therapies consistently impair solid-phase gastric emptying and may increase RGC, particularly during early treatment and dose escalation, with effects that can persist despite standard fasting and short-term drug interruption. Although clinically apparent aspiration events remain uncommon, multiple reports have described perioperative regurgitation or unexpected solid gastric contents at induction. Early guidance favoured routine preoperative drug interruption; however, more recent multisociety recommendations increasingly support continuation of therapy in most asymptomatic patients and endorse enhanced perioperative mitigation strategies, such as dietary modification, strict adherence to fasting, selective use of point-of-care gastric ultrasound, preference for regional anaesthesia when feasible, and tailored airway management. Overall, current data support an individualised, risk-adapted approach rather than uniform interruption of GLP-1 therapy. Continuation of structured mitigation appears reasonable for many patients, whereas heightened caution and full-stomach precautions remain appropriate in higher-risk situations. Further prospective studies are required to define true perioperative aspiration risk and to establish evidence-based management pathways.

使用GLP-1受体激动剂患者围手术期的管理——目前的证据、风险和实用建议。
胰高血糖素样肽-1受体激动剂(GLP-1 RAs)和双葡萄糖依赖性胰岛素性多肽GLP-1 RAs越来越多地被用于糖尿病和肥胖,导致越来越多的手术患者接受这些药物。它们延迟胃排空的能力引起了对胃内容物残留(RGCs)和麻醉期间潜在误吸的关注。来自机制研究、临床调查和病例报告的现有证据表明,基于glp -1的治疗持续损害固相胃排空,并可能增加RGC,特别是在早期治疗和剂量递增期间,尽管标准禁食和短期药物中断,其效果仍可持续存在。尽管临床上明显的误吸事件并不常见,但有多篇报道描述了围手术期反流或诱导时意外的胃固体内容物。早期指导倾向于术前常规药物中断;然而,最近多社会的建议越来越多地支持在大多数无症状患者中继续治疗,并支持强化围手术期缓解策略,如饮食调整、严格遵守禁食、选择性使用即时胃超声、可行时首选局部麻醉以及量身定制的气道管理。总的来说,目前的数据支持个体化、风险适应的方法,而不是统一中断GLP-1治疗。对许多患者来说,继续有组织的缓解似乎是合理的,而在高风险情况下,提高警惕和全胃预防措施仍然是适当的。需要进一步的前瞻性研究来确定真正的围手术期误吸风险并建立循证管理途径。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书