Applying PCR cycle autonormalization to PacBio full-length 16S rRNA library preparations: impacts on error rates and sequence distributions.

IF 4 2区 生物学 Q2 MICROBIOLOGY
mSphere Pub Date : 2026-07-28 Epub Date: 2026-06-22 DOI:10.1128/msphere.00295-26
Charles J Mason, Mikinley Weaver, Karma R Kissinger, Melissa A Johnson, Duan C Copeland, Kirk E Anderson, Scott M Geib
{"title":"Applying PCR cycle autonormalization to PacBio full-length 16S rRNA library preparations: impacts on error rates and sequence distributions.","authors":"Charles J Mason, Mikinley Weaver, Karma R Kissinger, Melissa A Johnson, Duan C Copeland, Kirk E Anderson, Scott M Geib","doi":"10.1128/msphere.00295-26","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The bacterial 16S rRNA gene is widely used to characterize host-associated and environmental microbiomes, most commonly through sequencing short hypervariable regions. Recent improvements in PacBio sequencing chemistry and concatenation approaches can now enable high-throughput, full-length 16S rRNA gene sequencing with high accuracy and depth. However, errors introduced during library preparation remain a major limitation, particularly during PCR amplification of full-length amplicons, where error accumulation may be elevated due to longer sequence lengths. These challenges are amplified when samples vary widely in microbial biomass, making it difficult to select a single optimal number of PCR cycles. Here, we evaluated PCR cycle autonormalization for PacBio Kinnex full-length 16S rRNA gene sequencing across seven agriculturally relevant specimen types. We compared conventional fixed-cycle PCR protocols (20, 24, and 30 cycles) with an autonormalization approach in which individual reactions were terminated during exponential amplification based on real-time fluorescence thresholds. Under the workflow tested here, autonormalized libraries generally retained a high proportion of sequences following denoising and chimera removal, exhibited low residual error rates (<0.005%), and yielded relatively even read distributions across heterogeneous sample inputs. Overamplified reactions (30 cycles) showed elevated residual error rates and greater sequence loss, particularly in samples with higher microbial biodiversity, whereas low-cycle libraries produced more variable read output among specimens. Importantly, the PCR protocol had relatively minor effects on overall community composition compared with specimen type. These results support PCR cycle autonormalization as a useful workflow strategy for heterogeneous full-length 16S library preparation, while also highlighting the importance of library design, pooling strategy, and downstream processing in shaping technical outcomes.IMPORTANCEAmplicon-based sequencing of the 16S rRNA gene is a foundational tool in microbiome research, yet PCR amplification remains a major source of library-preparation error. This challenge is magnified for full-length 16S rRNA sequencing and for workflows that process specimen types with widely varying microbial biomass. Selecting a single PCR cycle number can underamplify low-biomass samples or overamplify high-titer samples, increasing artifacts and sequence loss during downstream processing. Here, we show that PCR cycle autonormalization can be integrated into a PacBio full-length 16S rRNA workflow and, under the conditions tested, provides low residual error rates and relatively even sample representation across heterogeneous inputs. Autonormalization also enables blind pooling of amplicons without post-PCR quantification or equimolar normalization, reducing hands-on time and sample loss. These benefits make cycle autonormalization particularly valuable for high-throughput and production-scale library preparation applications handling diverse specimen types.</p>","PeriodicalId":19052,"journal":{"name":"mSphere","volume":" ","pages":"e0029526"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13410752/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"mSphere","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1128/msphere.00295-26","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/6/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The bacterial 16S rRNA gene is widely used to characterize host-associated and environmental microbiomes, most commonly through sequencing short hypervariable regions. Recent improvements in PacBio sequencing chemistry and concatenation approaches can now enable high-throughput, full-length 16S rRNA gene sequencing with high accuracy and depth. However, errors introduced during library preparation remain a major limitation, particularly during PCR amplification of full-length amplicons, where error accumulation may be elevated due to longer sequence lengths. These challenges are amplified when samples vary widely in microbial biomass, making it difficult to select a single optimal number of PCR cycles. Here, we evaluated PCR cycle autonormalization for PacBio Kinnex full-length 16S rRNA gene sequencing across seven agriculturally relevant specimen types. We compared conventional fixed-cycle PCR protocols (20, 24, and 30 cycles) with an autonormalization approach in which individual reactions were terminated during exponential amplification based on real-time fluorescence thresholds. Under the workflow tested here, autonormalized libraries generally retained a high proportion of sequences following denoising and chimera removal, exhibited low residual error rates (<0.005%), and yielded relatively even read distributions across heterogeneous sample inputs. Overamplified reactions (30 cycles) showed elevated residual error rates and greater sequence loss, particularly in samples with higher microbial biodiversity, whereas low-cycle libraries produced more variable read output among specimens. Importantly, the PCR protocol had relatively minor effects on overall community composition compared with specimen type. These results support PCR cycle autonormalization as a useful workflow strategy for heterogeneous full-length 16S library preparation, while also highlighting the importance of library design, pooling strategy, and downstream processing in shaping technical outcomes.IMPORTANCEAmplicon-based sequencing of the 16S rRNA gene is a foundational tool in microbiome research, yet PCR amplification remains a major source of library-preparation error. This challenge is magnified for full-length 16S rRNA sequencing and for workflows that process specimen types with widely varying microbial biomass. Selecting a single PCR cycle number can underamplify low-biomass samples or overamplify high-titer samples, increasing artifacts and sequence loss during downstream processing. Here, we show that PCR cycle autonormalization can be integrated into a PacBio full-length 16S rRNA workflow and, under the conditions tested, provides low residual error rates and relatively even sample representation across heterogeneous inputs. Autonormalization also enables blind pooling of amplicons without post-PCR quantification or equimolar normalization, reducing hands-on time and sample loss. These benefits make cycle autonormalization particularly valuable for high-throughput and production-scale library preparation applications handling diverse specimen types.

在PacBio全长16S rRNA文库制备中应用PCR周期自动规范化:对错误率和序列分布的影响
细菌16S rRNA基因被广泛用于表征宿主相关和环境微生物组,最常见的是通过对短高变区进行测序。PacBio测序化学和连接方法的最新改进现在可以实现高通量,高精度和深度的全长16S rRNA基因测序。然而,文库制备过程中引入的错误仍然是一个主要的限制,特别是在全长扩增子的PCR扩增过程中,由于序列长度较长,错误积累可能会增加。当样品的微生物生物量差异很大时,这些挑战就会被放大,这使得很难选择单一的最佳PCR循环数。在这里,我们评估了PacBio Kinnex全长16S rRNA基因测序在7种农业相关标本类型上的PCR周期自动化。我们比较了传统的固定周期PCR方案(20,24和30个周期)和自动正规化方法,其中单个反应在基于实时荧光阈值的指数扩增期间终止。在本文测试的工作流程下,自动化规范化库在去噪和去除嵌合体后通常保留了高比例的序列,显示出较低的残余错误率(
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
mSphere
mSphere Immunology and Microbiology-Microbiology
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
2.10%
发文量
192
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊介绍: mSphere™ is a multi-disciplinary open-access journal that will focus on rapid publication of fundamental contributions to our understanding of microbiology. Its scope will reflect the immense range of fields within the microbial sciences, creating new opportunities for researchers to share findings that are transforming our understanding of human health and disease, ecosystems, neuroscience, agriculture, energy production, climate change, evolution, biogeochemical cycling, and food and drug production. Submissions will be encouraged of all high-quality work that makes fundamental contributions to our understanding of microbiology. mSphere™ will provide streamlined decisions, while carrying on ASM''s tradition for rigorous peer review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书