{"title":"Comparative bioavailability of sublingual vs. oral levothyroxine in patients with post-thyroidectomy hypothyroidism: A single-dose pilot study.","authors":"Osama Shoaip, Mahmoud Bassiony, Rana Elbayar, Mohanned Mohsen, Hagar Elhammady, Rawda Elsaadany, Nehal M Ramadan","doi":"10.1002/bcp.70661","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To evaluate the relative bioavailability of sublingual vs. oral levothyroxine (L-T4) in post-thyroidectomy patients, aiming to overcome gastrointestinal absorption variability.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This open-label, randomized, parallel-group pilot study enrolled 15 de novo hypothyroid patients following total thyroidectomy (oral: n = 7, sublingual: n = 8). Participants received a single 700-μg L-T4 dose under fasting conditions. Pharmacokinetic parameters, including baseline-corrected AUC, Cmax and Tmax, were determined via noncompartmental analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sublingual administration resulted in a Geometric Mean Ratio (GMR) of 1.283 (90% CI: 0.849-1.938) for total systemic exposure (AUC<sub>0-∞</sub>) and 1.123 (90% CI: 0.815-1.547) for early exposure (AUC<sub>0-48</sub>) compared to the oral route. Due to the small sample size and inter-subject variability, these differences did not reach statistical significance. Elimination kinetics (T<sub>1/2</sub>, MRT) were route-independent, while sublingual delivery showed lower apparent clearance (CL/F), supporting improved bioavailability.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Sublingual L-T4 achieved numerically higher systemic exposure with comparable elimination kinetics to the oral route. These findings suggest sublingual delivery is a promising, practical alternative that mitigates fasting constraints. Large-scale crossover studies are needed to definitively establish bioequivalence and long-term efficacy.</p>","PeriodicalId":9251,"journal":{"name":"British journal of clinical pharmacology","volume":" ","pages":"3527-3533"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British journal of clinical pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/bcp.70661","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/6/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Aim: To evaluate the relative bioavailability of sublingual vs. oral levothyroxine (L-T4) in post-thyroidectomy patients, aiming to overcome gastrointestinal absorption variability.
Methods: This open-label, randomized, parallel-group pilot study enrolled 15 de novo hypothyroid patients following total thyroidectomy (oral: n = 7, sublingual: n = 8). Participants received a single 700-μg L-T4 dose under fasting conditions. Pharmacokinetic parameters, including baseline-corrected AUC, Cmax and Tmax, were determined via noncompartmental analysis.
Results: Sublingual administration resulted in a Geometric Mean Ratio (GMR) of 1.283 (90% CI: 0.849-1.938) for total systemic exposure (AUC0-∞) and 1.123 (90% CI: 0.815-1.547) for early exposure (AUC0-48) compared to the oral route. Due to the small sample size and inter-subject variability, these differences did not reach statistical significance. Elimination kinetics (T1/2, MRT) were route-independent, while sublingual delivery showed lower apparent clearance (CL/F), supporting improved bioavailability.
Conclusion: Sublingual L-T4 achieved numerically higher systemic exposure with comparable elimination kinetics to the oral route. These findings suggest sublingual delivery is a promising, practical alternative that mitigates fasting constraints. Large-scale crossover studies are needed to definitively establish bioequivalence and long-term efficacy.
期刊介绍:
Published on behalf of the British Pharmacological Society, the British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology features papers and reports on all aspects of drug action in humans: review articles, mini review articles, original papers, commentaries, editorials and letters. The Journal enjoys a wide readership, bridging the gap between the medical profession, clinical research and the pharmaceutical industry. It also publishes research on new methods, new drugs and new approaches to treatment. The Journal is recognised as one of the leading publications in its field. It is online only, publishes open access research through its OnlineOpen programme and is published monthly.