Deprescription of proton pump inhibitors in the primary care setting in the Canary Islands. A randomized massive educational intervention.

IF 2.9 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Miguel Del-Pino, Emilio J Sanz
{"title":"Deprescription of proton pump inhibitors in the primary care setting in the Canary Islands. A randomized massive educational intervention.","authors":"Miguel Del-Pino, Emilio J Sanz","doi":"10.1186/s12875-026-03432-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>It is estimated that between 20% and 80% of Proton Pump Inhibitor (PPI) prescriptions worldwide lack an appropriate clinical indication. Since their introduction in 1989, PPIs have proven highly effective for treating acid-related digestive disorders. However, over three decades of global use have revealed notable side effects, notwithstanding their overall safety profile. The chronic and indiscriminate use of PPIs by millions of people without proper indications represents a substantial public health issue and threatens the sustainability of health services worldwide.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the clinical and economic outcomes of deprescribing PPIs that are indefinitely and incorrectly prescribed in primary care centres across the Canary Islands after an educational intervention.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>An online training course was developed to educate family physicians on deprescribing PPIs in accordance with internationally recognized guidelines. Indications for PPI prescriptions were assessed and compared among an intervention group and two control cohorts: physicians interested in but not participating in the training, and those who did not express any interest on it. Following an initial assessment at twelve weeks, the second interested group received the same training. Chronic prescribing practices were then evaluated for all three groups at twelve and twenty-four weeks post-study initiation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Before the intervention the 8% of indefinite PPI prescriptions in the primary care setting met the appropriate criteria according to the guideline used. This percentage did not increase in the groups of trained physicians. However, PPI-related expenditures were significantly lower in the intervention group compared to both control groups at 24 weeks, with the intervention group showing a median reduction of €82 per physician, while the control and anonymous groups showed increases of €15 and €160 respectively (p = 0.020 for the initial to 12-week comparison).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Given the high volume of use of these medicines, any strategy aimed at improving their management by physicians can have a significant beneficial effect on the health of the population, and an exponential impact on the consumption of public resources. Longer-term follow-up, improved documentation of indications, and increased longitudinal patient care may play a critical role in the impact of educational interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":72428,"journal":{"name":"BMC primary care","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13536726/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC primary care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12875-026-03432-0","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: It is estimated that between 20% and 80% of Proton Pump Inhibitor (PPI) prescriptions worldwide lack an appropriate clinical indication. Since their introduction in 1989, PPIs have proven highly effective for treating acid-related digestive disorders. However, over three decades of global use have revealed notable side effects, notwithstanding their overall safety profile. The chronic and indiscriminate use of PPIs by millions of people without proper indications represents a substantial public health issue and threatens the sustainability of health services worldwide.

Objective: To evaluate the clinical and economic outcomes of deprescribing PPIs that are indefinitely and incorrectly prescribed in primary care centres across the Canary Islands after an educational intervention.

Method: An online training course was developed to educate family physicians on deprescribing PPIs in accordance with internationally recognized guidelines. Indications for PPI prescriptions were assessed and compared among an intervention group and two control cohorts: physicians interested in but not participating in the training, and those who did not express any interest on it. Following an initial assessment at twelve weeks, the second interested group received the same training. Chronic prescribing practices were then evaluated for all three groups at twelve and twenty-four weeks post-study initiation.

Results: Before the intervention the 8% of indefinite PPI prescriptions in the primary care setting met the appropriate criteria according to the guideline used. This percentage did not increase in the groups of trained physicians. However, PPI-related expenditures were significantly lower in the intervention group compared to both control groups at 24 weeks, with the intervention group showing a median reduction of €82 per physician, while the control and anonymous groups showed increases of €15 and €160 respectively (p = 0.020 for the initial to 12-week comparison).

Conclusions: Given the high volume of use of these medicines, any strategy aimed at improving their management by physicians can have a significant beneficial effect on the health of the population, and an exponential impact on the consumption of public resources. Longer-term follow-up, improved documentation of indications, and increased longitudinal patient care may play a critical role in the impact of educational interventions.

在加那利群岛的初级保健设置质子泵抑制剂的处方。随机的大规模教育干预。
背景:据估计,全世界20%到80%的质子泵抑制剂(PPI)处方缺乏适当的临床适应症。自1989年推出以来,PPIs已被证明对治疗酸相关消化系统疾病非常有效。然而,在全球使用的30多年中,尽管其总体安全性较好,但仍显示出明显的副作用。数百万人在没有适当适应症的情况下长期和不加选择地使用质子泵抑制剂,这是一个重大的公共卫生问题,并威胁到全世界卫生服务的可持续性。目的:评估加那利群岛初级保健中心在教育干预后无限期和不正确地处方PPIs的临床和经济结果。方法:开发在线培训课程,教育家庭医生如何按照国际公认的指南开处方的PPIs。在干预组和两个对照组(对培训感兴趣但未参加培训的医生和对培训没有任何兴趣的医生)之间评估和比较PPI处方的适应症。在第12周的初步评估之后,第二个感兴趣的小组接受了同样的培训。然后在研究开始后的12周和24周对所有三组的慢性处方实践进行评估。结果:干预前,8%的无限期PPI处方在初级保健设置符合适当的标准,根据所使用的指南。这一比例在训练有素的医生组中没有增加。然而,与两个对照组相比,干预组的ppi相关支出在24周时显著降低,干预组每位医生平均减少82欧元,而对照组和匿名组分别增加了15欧元和160欧元(初始至12周比较p = 0.020)。结论:鉴于这些药物的大量使用,任何旨在改善医生对其管理的战略都可以对人口的健康产生重大有益影响,并对公共资源的消耗产生指数级影响。长期随访、改进的适应症记录和增加的纵向患者护理可能在教育干预的影响中发挥关键作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书