Vigilance and Well-Being in Daily Life: An Examination of Race Differences.

IF 2 2区 社会学 Q1 ETHNIC STUDIES
Race and Social Problems Pub Date : 2026-01-01 Epub Date: 2026-06-19 DOI:10.1007/s12552-026-09510-3
Emily C Noyer, Angela Turkelson, Kira S Birditt
{"title":"Vigilance and Well-Being in Daily Life: An Examination of Race Differences.","authors":"Emily C Noyer, Angela Turkelson, Kira S Birditt","doi":"10.1007/s12552-026-09510-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The anticipation of discrimination, referred to as vigilance, may be an important driver of racial health inequities in cardiovascular disease and mortality. The current study examined how vigilance is experienced in daily life and its implications for daily cardiovascular health and emotional well-being. Participants included 80 Black and 89 White adults ages 33 to 91, from the Detroit tri-county metropolitan area, who completed ecological momentary assessments (EMAs) via mobile devices regarding experiences of vigilance and emotional well-being every 3 hs, and wore a heart monitor for 4 consecutive days. Data were collected from 2018 to 2020. Multilevel models revealed that Black individuals reported more frequent experiences of vigilance than White individuals, and that vigilance was associated with poorer emotional well-being (higher negative affect; lower positive affect) and higher heart rate in the 3-h periods in which respondents reported vigilance. Race-stratified models demonstrated that vigilance was associated with greater negative affect among Black and White individuals, and lower positive affect among the White individuals only. Vigilance was associated with higher heart rate variability for Black individuals only, indicating greater physiological coping. This adaptation among Black individuals may arise from more frequent experiences of vigilance in daily life and may serve to buffer physiological and emotional effects of daily vigilance. This study demonstrates how vigilance may \"get under the skin\", among Black and White individuals, which could pose effects on cardiovascular functioning over the long term.</p><p><strong>Supplementary information: </strong>The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12552-026-09510-3.</p>","PeriodicalId":46715,"journal":{"name":"Race and Social Problems","volume":"18 3","pages":"46"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13282204/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Race and Social Problems","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12552-026-09510-3","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/6/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ETHNIC STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The anticipation of discrimination, referred to as vigilance, may be an important driver of racial health inequities in cardiovascular disease and mortality. The current study examined how vigilance is experienced in daily life and its implications for daily cardiovascular health and emotional well-being. Participants included 80 Black and 89 White adults ages 33 to 91, from the Detroit tri-county metropolitan area, who completed ecological momentary assessments (EMAs) via mobile devices regarding experiences of vigilance and emotional well-being every 3 hs, and wore a heart monitor for 4 consecutive days. Data were collected from 2018 to 2020. Multilevel models revealed that Black individuals reported more frequent experiences of vigilance than White individuals, and that vigilance was associated with poorer emotional well-being (higher negative affect; lower positive affect) and higher heart rate in the 3-h periods in which respondents reported vigilance. Race-stratified models demonstrated that vigilance was associated with greater negative affect among Black and White individuals, and lower positive affect among the White individuals only. Vigilance was associated with higher heart rate variability for Black individuals only, indicating greater physiological coping. This adaptation among Black individuals may arise from more frequent experiences of vigilance in daily life and may serve to buffer physiological and emotional effects of daily vigilance. This study demonstrates how vigilance may "get under the skin", among Black and White individuals, which could pose effects on cardiovascular functioning over the long term.

Supplementary information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12552-026-09510-3.

日常生活中的警惕性和幸福感:对种族差异的考察。
对歧视的预期,称为警惕,可能是心血管疾病和死亡率方面种族健康不平等的重要驱动因素。目前的研究调查了日常生活中警惕性是如何经历的,以及它对日常心血管健康和情绪健康的影响。参与者包括来自底特律三县都市区的80名黑人和89名白人,年龄在33至91岁之间,他们每3小时通过移动设备完成一次关于警惕性和情绪健康体验的生态瞬间评估(EMAs),并连续4天佩戴心脏监测器。数据收集于2018年至2020年。多层模型显示,黑人比白人更频繁地报告警惕经历,并且在被调查者报告警惕的3小时内,警惕与较差的情绪健康(较高的负面影响;较低的积极影响)和较高的心率有关。种族分层模型表明,在黑人和白人个体中,警惕性与更大的消极影响有关,而在白人个体中,警惕性与更低的积极影响有关。只有黑人个体的警惕性与较高的心率变异性有关,这表明他们有更强的生理应对能力。黑人个体的这种适应可能源于日常生活中更频繁的警惕经历,并可能有助于缓冲日常警惕的生理和情感影响。这项研究表明,在黑人和白人中,警惕性是如何“深入皮肤”的,这可能会对心血管功能产生长期影响。补充资料:在线版本包含补充资料,下载地址:10.1007/s12552-026-09510-3。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
6.50%
发文量
28
期刊介绍: Race and Social Problems (RASP) provides a multidisciplinary forum for the publication of articles and discussion of issues germane to race and its enduring relationship to socioeconomic, psychological, political, and cultural problems. The journal publishes original empirical studies, reviews of past research, theoretical studies, and invited essays that advance the understanding of the complexities of race and its relationship to social problems.  Submissions from the fields of social work, anthropology, communications, criminology, economics, history, law, political science, psychology, public health, and sociology are welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书