First-Line Treatment of Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia in Italy: Real-World Evidence on Utilization, Outcomes, and Healthcare Costs.

IF 2.6 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research Pub Date : 2026-06-16 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.2147/CEOR.S598572
Valentina Perrone, Vanessa Innao, Stefania Mazzoni, Maria Cappuccilli, Margherita Andretta, Fausto Bartolini, Alessandro Chinellato, Stefania Dell'Orco, Fulvio Ferrante, Renato Lombardi, Romina Pagliaro, Loredana Ubertazzo, Paola Valpondi, Luca Degli Esposti
{"title":"First-Line Treatment of Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia in Italy: Real-World Evidence on Utilization, Outcomes, and Healthcare Costs.","authors":"Valentina Perrone, Vanessa Innao, Stefania Mazzoni, Maria Cappuccilli, Margherita Andretta, Fausto Bartolini, Alessandro Chinellato, Stefania Dell'Orco, Fulvio Ferrante, Renato Lombardi, Romina Pagliaro, Loredana Ubertazzo, Paola Valpondi, Luca Degli Esposti","doi":"10.2147/CEOR.S598572","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) is the most common adult leukemia in Western countries, mainly affecting older people. Targeted agents have reshaped first-line (1L) strategies, making real-world evidence important to complement clinical trials.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To estimate the incidence of Italian patients initiating first-line CLL therapy (2019-2022) and describe demographics/clinical profile, treatment patterns, adherence, outcomes (overall survival [OS], time to next treatment [TTNT]), and healthcare costs from the perspective of the Italian National Health System (NHS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective observational study using administrative healthcare databases (~9 million residents) was conducted on CLL patients starting 1L therapy (index-date) for CLL. Baseline characteristics were assessed in the 12 months pre-index; follow-up was ≥12 months. Drug use, adherence (medication possession ratio), dose adjustments, OS, TTNT, and direct costs were analyzed with descriptive and multivariable methods.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1479 patients initiated 1L therapy: 63.9% chemotherapy (CHT), 23.2% ibrutinib, 3.2% acalabrutinib, and 9.7% other regimens. CHT remained common, especially among older and more comorbid patients. Ibrutinib showed lower mortality versus CHT (HR 0.663; p=0.002) and longer TTNT (median not reached). Dose adjustments were frequent; extended refill intervals did not appear to reduce drug survival. Mean annual cost per patient was €38,573, mainly driven by drug acquisition; ibrutinib users had lower hospitalization and outpatient costs than other 1L groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In Italian practice, ibrutinib was the main targeted 1L option and was associated with improved survival and delayed progression versus CHT. Despite higher drug costs, reduced hospital-based resource use suggests favourable overall clinical and economic impact.</p>","PeriodicalId":47313,"journal":{"name":"ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research","volume":"18 ","pages":"598572"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13282982/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/CEOR.S598572","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) is the most common adult leukemia in Western countries, mainly affecting older people. Targeted agents have reshaped first-line (1L) strategies, making real-world evidence important to complement clinical trials.

Objective: To estimate the incidence of Italian patients initiating first-line CLL therapy (2019-2022) and describe demographics/clinical profile, treatment patterns, adherence, outcomes (overall survival [OS], time to next treatment [TTNT]), and healthcare costs from the perspective of the Italian National Health System (NHS).

Methods: A retrospective observational study using administrative healthcare databases (~9 million residents) was conducted on CLL patients starting 1L therapy (index-date) for CLL. Baseline characteristics were assessed in the 12 months pre-index; follow-up was ≥12 months. Drug use, adherence (medication possession ratio), dose adjustments, OS, TTNT, and direct costs were analyzed with descriptive and multivariable methods.

Results: A total of 1479 patients initiated 1L therapy: 63.9% chemotherapy (CHT), 23.2% ibrutinib, 3.2% acalabrutinib, and 9.7% other regimens. CHT remained common, especially among older and more comorbid patients. Ibrutinib showed lower mortality versus CHT (HR 0.663; p=0.002) and longer TTNT (median not reached). Dose adjustments were frequent; extended refill intervals did not appear to reduce drug survival. Mean annual cost per patient was €38,573, mainly driven by drug acquisition; ibrutinib users had lower hospitalization and outpatient costs than other 1L groups.

Conclusion: In Italian practice, ibrutinib was the main targeted 1L option and was associated with improved survival and delayed progression versus CHT. Despite higher drug costs, reduced hospital-based resource use suggests favourable overall clinical and economic impact.

意大利慢性淋巴细胞白血病的一线治疗:关于使用、结果和医疗费用的真实世界证据。
背景:慢性淋巴细胞白血病(Chronic lymphocytic leukemia, CLL)是西方国家最常见的成人白血病,主要影响老年人。靶向药物重塑了一线(1L)策略,使真实世界的证据对补充临床试验很重要。目的:估计意大利患者开始一线CLL治疗的发生率(2019-2022),并从意大利国家卫生系统(NHS)的角度描述人口统计学/临床概况、治疗模式、依从性、结局(总生存期[OS]、下一次治疗时间[TTNT])和医疗费用。方法:利用行政卫生保健数据库(约900万居民)对CLL患者进行回顾性观察研究。在指数前12个月评估基线特征;随访≥12个月。采用描述性和多变量方法分析药物使用情况、依从性(药物占有比)、剂量调整、OS、TTNT和直接成本。结果:共有1479例患者接受了1L治疗:化疗(CHT)占63.9%,依鲁替尼占23.2%,阿卡拉布替尼占3.2%,其他方案占9.7%。CHT仍然很常见,特别是在老年和更多合并症患者中。与CHT相比,伊鲁替尼显示更低的死亡率(HR 0.663; p=0.002)和更长的TTNT(未达到中位数)。剂量调整频繁;延长的补充间隔似乎并没有降低药物生存期。每位患者的年平均成本为38,573欧元,主要由药物收购驱动;依鲁替尼使用者的住院和门诊费用低于其他1L组。结论:在意大利的实践中,ibrutinib是主要的靶向1L选择,与CHT相比,ibrutinib与改善生存和延迟进展相关。尽管药品成本较高,但医院资源使用的减少表明总体临床和经济效果良好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research
ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
83
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书