Increased injury severity and age-related mortality in trauma victims after e-bike versus conventional bicycle accidents: a concerning call to action!

IF 3.3 Q1 SURGERY
Deniz D Özman, Sabine M I Roth, Maria Gabriella Fois, Luca Diehr, Michel P J Teuben, Huanglin Zhang, Max Praster, Till Berk, Frank Hildebrand, Rald V M Groven
{"title":"Increased injury severity and age-related mortality in trauma victims after e-bike versus conventional bicycle accidents: a concerning call to action!","authors":"Deniz D Özman, Sabine M I Roth, Maria Gabriella Fois, Luca Diehr, Michel P J Teuben, Huanglin Zhang, Max Praster, Till Berk, Frank Hildebrand, Rald V M Groven","doi":"10.1186/s13037-026-00494-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Although e-bike accidents are of growing clinical relevance, there is limited large-scale research comparing injury patterns and outcomes between e-bike (EB) and conventional bicycle (CB) accidents in large patient cohorts. This study performed comparative analyses of both groups to identify patients at risk and guide future prevention and clinical management strategies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis of the TraumaRegister DGU<sup>®</sup> was conducted. Patients aged 16 years or older who sustained severe injuries (AIS ≥ 3 in minimally one body region) in accidents involving conventional bicycles or e-bikes between January 2020 and December 2023 were included. Patient demographics, injury patterns, trauma severity, treatment characteristics, and clinical outcomes were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 9,170 bicycle accident cases were included (EB n = 1,160; CB n = 8,010). EB riders were significantly older than CB riders (median age 63 years; IQR 53-73 vs. 57 years IQR 44-69; p < 0.001) and more frequently sustained polytrauma (16.7% vs. 12.3%; p < 0.001). Compared with CB riders, EB riders more often suffered injuries to the head (67.2% vs. 56.2%; p < 0.01), face (22.7% vs. 17.8%; p < 0.001), and chest (55.2% vs. 51.8%; p = 0.030), and were more likely to sustain injuries affecting multiple body regions (p < 0.001). Primary ICU treatment was required more frequently after EB accidents (70.3% vs. 63.5%; p < 0.001). Age-stratified analyses showed that younger EB riders were more frequently involved in nighttime and alcohol-related accidents, whereas mortality increased significantly with age, from 2.7% in patients aged 16-59 years to 18.6% in those aged ≥ 80 years.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>E-bike accidents are associated with a higher prevalence of head, face, and chest injuries, increased rates of polytrauma and multi-region injuries, and a greater need for ICU treatment compared with conventional bicycle accidents. These differences are particularly relevant in older riders, who represent the majority of severely injured e-bike users and experience substantially higher mortality rates. Targeted prevention strategies, improved protective measures, and age-specific risk communication may help reduce the burden of e-bike-related injuries.</p>","PeriodicalId":46782,"journal":{"name":"Patient Safety in Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13288559/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Patient Safety in Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13037-026-00494-y","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Although e-bike accidents are of growing clinical relevance, there is limited large-scale research comparing injury patterns and outcomes between e-bike (EB) and conventional bicycle (CB) accidents in large patient cohorts. This study performed comparative analyses of both groups to identify patients at risk and guide future prevention and clinical management strategies.

Methods: A retrospective analysis of the TraumaRegister DGU® was conducted. Patients aged 16 years or older who sustained severe injuries (AIS ≥ 3 in minimally one body region) in accidents involving conventional bicycles or e-bikes between January 2020 and December 2023 were included. Patient demographics, injury patterns, trauma severity, treatment characteristics, and clinical outcomes were analyzed.

Results: A total of 9,170 bicycle accident cases were included (EB n = 1,160; CB n = 8,010). EB riders were significantly older than CB riders (median age 63 years; IQR 53-73 vs. 57 years IQR 44-69; p < 0.001) and more frequently sustained polytrauma (16.7% vs. 12.3%; p < 0.001). Compared with CB riders, EB riders more often suffered injuries to the head (67.2% vs. 56.2%; p < 0.01), face (22.7% vs. 17.8%; p < 0.001), and chest (55.2% vs. 51.8%; p = 0.030), and were more likely to sustain injuries affecting multiple body regions (p < 0.001). Primary ICU treatment was required more frequently after EB accidents (70.3% vs. 63.5%; p < 0.001). Age-stratified analyses showed that younger EB riders were more frequently involved in nighttime and alcohol-related accidents, whereas mortality increased significantly with age, from 2.7% in patients aged 16-59 years to 18.6% in those aged ≥ 80 years.

Conclusions: E-bike accidents are associated with a higher prevalence of head, face, and chest injuries, increased rates of polytrauma and multi-region injuries, and a greater need for ICU treatment compared with conventional bicycle accidents. These differences are particularly relevant in older riders, who represent the majority of severely injured e-bike users and experience substantially higher mortality rates. Targeted prevention strategies, improved protective measures, and age-specific risk communication may help reduce the burden of e-bike-related injuries.

与传统自行车事故相比,电动自行车事故后创伤受害者的伤害严重程度和年龄相关死亡率增加:一个令人担忧的行动呼吁!
背景:尽管电动自行车事故的临床相关性越来越大,但在大型患者队列中,比较电动自行车(EB)和传统自行车(CB)事故的伤害模式和结果的大规模研究有限。本研究对两组进行了比较分析,以确定有风险的患者,并指导未来的预防和临床管理策略。方法:对创伤登记DGU®进行回顾性分析。在2020年1月至2023年12月期间,在涉及传统自行车或电动自行车的事故中遭受严重伤害(至少一个身体区域的AIS≥3)的16岁或以上患者被纳入研究。分析了患者人口统计、损伤模式、创伤严重程度、治疗特征和临床结果。结果:共纳入9170例自行车事故,其中EB = 1160例,CB = 8010例。EB骑车者明显比CB骑车者年龄大(中位年龄63岁;IQR为53-73岁vs. 57岁;IQR为44-69岁;p < 0.001),更频繁地出现多发创伤(16.7% vs. 12.3%; p < 0.001)。与CB骑手相比,EB骑手更容易受到头部(67.2%比56.2%,p < 0.01)、面部(22.7%比17.8%,p < 0.001)和胸部(55.2%比51.8%,p = 0.030)的伤害,并且更容易受到多身体区域的伤害(p < 0.001)。EB事故后需要初级ICU治疗的频率更高(70.3%比63.5%;p < 0.001)。年龄分层分析显示,年轻的EB车手更频繁地发生夜间和酒精相关事故,而死亡率随着年龄的增长而显著增加,从16-59岁患者的2.7%增加到≥80岁患者的18.6%。结论:与传统自行车事故相比,电动自行车事故与头部、面部和胸部损伤的发生率较高有关,多发伤和多区域损伤的发生率增加,并且需要更多的ICU治疗。这些差异在老年骑行者中尤为重要,他们在严重受伤的电动自行车使用者中占大多数,死亡率要高得多。有针对性的预防策略、改进的保护措施和针对特定年龄的风险沟通可能有助于减轻电动自行车相关伤害的负担。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
8.10%
发文量
37
审稿时长
9 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书