Virtual population-based analysis of anatomical and electrophysiological risk markers for atrial fibrillation.

IF 0.6 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
JRSM Cardiovascular Disease Pub Date : 2026-06-17 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.1177/20480040261455938
Giada S Romitti, María Termenón-Rivas, Alejandro Liberos, Miguel Rodrigo
{"title":"Virtual population-based analysis of anatomical and electrophysiological risk markers for atrial fibrillation.","authors":"Giada S Romitti, María Termenón-Rivas, Alejandro Liberos, Miguel Rodrigo","doi":"10.1177/20480040261455938","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Atrial fibrillation (AF) prevalence has increased markedly over the past two decades, underscoring the need for personalized approaches to diagnosis, risk stratification, and therapy. Computational modeling provides a framework to integrate patient-specific anatomy and electrophysiology, offering mechanistic insights into arrhythmia susceptibility. We analyzed a virtual population of 160 bi-atrial models to investigate how structural and electrophysiological markers contribute to AF vulnerability and patterns. Each virtual patient incorporated geometries with varying enlargement, structural (conduction velocity, CV), and electrical (action potential duration, APD) remodeling. Virtual patients were characterized through anatomical markers, defined as inter-landmark distances, and electrophysiological markers, such as total activation time. AF vulnerability was tested by programmed stimulation from multiple atrial sites in 800 simulations. Lower CV and APD increased arrhythmic incidence, consistent with prior work. Larger atrial lateral extent and longer Bachmann's bundle length raised AF initiation likelihood by ∼20% (<i>p</i> < 0.05), while total activation time did not distinguish inducible from non-inducible anatomies (<i>p</i> > 0.05). Anatomical features, including superior-to-inferior vena cava distance, distinguished organized from disorganized patterns, while electrophysiological biomarkers alone did not. Combined high anatomical and electrophysiological marker values were linked to greater inducibility during AF progression (+20%). These findings provide mechanistic evidence for the role of atrial biomarkers in AF initiation and maintenance, highlighting the value of virtual populations in capturing inter-patient variability. By linking structural and electrophysiological characteristics to arrhythmic risk, this approach supports improved patient stratification and the design of individualized therapeutic strategies for AF.</p>","PeriodicalId":30457,"journal":{"name":"JRSM Cardiovascular Disease","volume":"15 ","pages":"20480040261455938"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13276220/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JRSM Cardiovascular Disease","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20480040261455938","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Atrial fibrillation (AF) prevalence has increased markedly over the past two decades, underscoring the need for personalized approaches to diagnosis, risk stratification, and therapy. Computational modeling provides a framework to integrate patient-specific anatomy and electrophysiology, offering mechanistic insights into arrhythmia susceptibility. We analyzed a virtual population of 160 bi-atrial models to investigate how structural and electrophysiological markers contribute to AF vulnerability and patterns. Each virtual patient incorporated geometries with varying enlargement, structural (conduction velocity, CV), and electrical (action potential duration, APD) remodeling. Virtual patients were characterized through anatomical markers, defined as inter-landmark distances, and electrophysiological markers, such as total activation time. AF vulnerability was tested by programmed stimulation from multiple atrial sites in 800 simulations. Lower CV and APD increased arrhythmic incidence, consistent with prior work. Larger atrial lateral extent and longer Bachmann's bundle length raised AF initiation likelihood by ∼20% (p < 0.05), while total activation time did not distinguish inducible from non-inducible anatomies (p > 0.05). Anatomical features, including superior-to-inferior vena cava distance, distinguished organized from disorganized patterns, while electrophysiological biomarkers alone did not. Combined high anatomical and electrophysiological marker values were linked to greater inducibility during AF progression (+20%). These findings provide mechanistic evidence for the role of atrial biomarkers in AF initiation and maintenance, highlighting the value of virtual populations in capturing inter-patient variability. By linking structural and electrophysiological characteristics to arrhythmic risk, this approach supports improved patient stratification and the design of individualized therapeutic strategies for AF.

心房颤动的解剖和电生理危险标志物的虚拟人群分析。
心房颤动(AF)患病率在过去二十年中显著增加,强调需要个性化的诊断、风险分层和治疗方法。计算建模提供了一个框架来整合患者特定的解剖学和电生理学,提供了对心律失常易感性的机制见解。我们分析了160个双心房模型的虚拟人群,以研究结构和电生理标志物如何影响心房颤动的易感性和模式。每个虚拟患者都具有不同的扩大、结构(传导速度,CV)和电(动作电位持续时间,APD)重塑的几何形状。虚拟患者通过解剖标记(定义为标记间距离)和电生理标记(如总激活时间)来表征。在800次模拟中,通过对多个心房部位进行程序性刺激来测试心房颤动的易感性。较低的CV和APD增加了心律失常的发生率,这与先前的研究结果一致。较大的心房外侧延伸范围和较长的Bachmann束长度使房颤发生的可能性提高了约20% (p p > 0.05)。解剖特征,包括上下腔静脉距离,区分有组织和无组织的模式,而单独的电生理生物标志物没有。较高的解剖和电生理标记值与房颤进展过程中更大的诱导性相关(+20%)。这些发现为心房生物标志物在房颤发生和维持中的作用提供了机制证据,强调了虚拟人群在捕获患者间变异性方面的价值。通过将结构和电生理特征与心律失常风险联系起来,该方法支持改进患者分层和房颤个性化治疗策略的设计。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JRSM Cardiovascular Disease
JRSM Cardiovascular Disease CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
自引率
6.20%
发文量
12
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书