Internal Extramedullary Lengthening of the Femur With an Intramedullary Lengthening Nail: Outcomes and Technical Considerations From 2 Centers.

IF 1.7 3区 医学 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS
Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics Pub Date : 2026-10-01 Epub Date: 2026-06-23 DOI:10.1097/BPO.0000000000003380
Nickolas J Nahm, Andrew G Georgiadis, Anirejuoritse Bafor, Christopher A Iobst, Mark T Dahl
{"title":"Internal Extramedullary Lengthening of the Femur With an Intramedullary Lengthening Nail: Outcomes and Technical Considerations From 2 Centers.","authors":"Nickolas J Nahm, Andrew G Georgiadis, Anirejuoritse Bafor, Christopher A Iobst, Mark T Dahl","doi":"10.1097/BPO.0000000000003380","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Surgical techniques for internal limb lengthening continue to advance. This study evaluates outcomes and technical aspects of extramedullary motorized femoral lengthening in young children.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective review of extramedullary motorized femoral lengthening at 2 centers was performed. Variables of interest include complications, the magnitude of lengthening, and technical factors, including antegrade versus retrograde techniques.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty-five extramedullary motorized femoral lengthenings in 40 patients were included with a median follow-up of 27 months (range: 7.7 to 98.4 mo). Antegrade lengthening was performed in 40% of cases (18/45) and retrograde lengthening in 60% of cases (27/45). A median lengthening of 3.8 cm (14% of the femoral segment) was performed. At least one complication occurred in 56% of cases with 12 complications classified as modified Clavien-Dindo III (requiring a reoperation). There were no statistically significant differences in complication rates between antegrade and retrograde techniques.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Motorized extramedullary femoral lengthening is a viable treatment option for femoral lengthening in young children. The complication profile is comparable to other femoral lengthening techniques.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level IV.</p>","PeriodicalId":16945,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics","volume":" ","pages":"e885-e892"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/BPO.0000000000003380","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/6/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Surgical techniques for internal limb lengthening continue to advance. This study evaluates outcomes and technical aspects of extramedullary motorized femoral lengthening in young children.

Methods: A retrospective review of extramedullary motorized femoral lengthening at 2 centers was performed. Variables of interest include complications, the magnitude of lengthening, and technical factors, including antegrade versus retrograde techniques.

Results: Forty-five extramedullary motorized femoral lengthenings in 40 patients were included with a median follow-up of 27 months (range: 7.7 to 98.4 mo). Antegrade lengthening was performed in 40% of cases (18/45) and retrograde lengthening in 60% of cases (27/45). A median lengthening of 3.8 cm (14% of the femoral segment) was performed. At least one complication occurred in 56% of cases with 12 complications classified as modified Clavien-Dindo III (requiring a reoperation). There were no statistically significant differences in complication rates between antegrade and retrograde techniques.

Conclusions: Motorized extramedullary femoral lengthening is a viable treatment option for femoral lengthening in young children. The complication profile is comparable to other femoral lengthening techniques.

Level of evidence: Level IV.

用髓内延长钉对股骨进行髓内外延长:来自两个中心的结果和技术考虑。
背景:内肢延长手术技术不断进步。本研究评估了儿童髓外机动股骨延长术的结果和技术方面。方法:回顾性分析2个中心髓外电动股骨延长术。感兴趣的变量包括并发症、延长幅度和技术因素,包括顺行或逆行技术。结果:纳入40例患者的45例髓外机动股骨延长术,中位随访27个月(范围:7.7至98.4个月)。40%的病例(18/45)行顺行延长,60%的病例(27/45)行逆行延长。中位延长3.8 cm(股骨段的14%)。改良Clavien-Dindo III型(需要再次手术)的12例并发症中,56%的病例至少发生1例并发症。顺行和逆行手术的并发症发生率无统计学差异。结论:机动股髓外延长术是一种可行的治疗方法。并发症与其他股骨延长技术相似。证据等级:四级。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
17.60%
发文量
512
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: ​Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics is a leading journal that focuses specifically on traumatic injuries to give you hands-on on coverage of a fast-growing field. You''ll get articles that cover everything from the nature of injury to the effects of new drug therapies; everything from recommendations for more effective surgical approaches to the latest laboratory findings.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书