Comparative Performance of Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy and Lenvatinib in Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma Complicated by Portal Vein Tumor Thrombosis: A Propensity Score-Matched Cohort Analysis.

IF 3.9 3区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Journal of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Pub Date : 2026-06-15 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.2147/JHC.S589137
Jian Huang, Fu-Chen Liu, Yun Yang, Sheng-Xian Yuan, Fang-Ming Gu, Bei-Ge Jiang, Ze-Ya Pan
{"title":"Comparative Performance of Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy and Lenvatinib in Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma Complicated by Portal Vein Tumor Thrombosis: A Propensity Score-Matched Cohort Analysis.","authors":"Jian Huang, Fu-Chen Liu, Yun Yang, Sheng-Xian Yuan, Fang-Ming Gu, Bei-Ge Jiang, Ze-Ya Pan","doi":"10.2147/JHC.S589137","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To investigate whether adding stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) to lenvatinib improves outcomes for patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC) and portal vein tumor thrombosis (PVTT).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study enrolled 133 cases of uHCC with PVTT treated with either lenvatinib plus SBRT (n = 65) or lenvatinib alone (n = 68) between 2021 and 2023. To minimize baseline imbalances, 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM, caliper width, 0.02) was performed. The primary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Across the full study population, patients receiving lenvatinib in combination with SBRT experienced significantly longer median OS relative to those who received lenvatinib alone (24.7 vs 16.4 months; HR=0.521, 95% CI: 0.338-0.802, p = 0.003). A similar advantage was observed for PFS (13.0 vs 8.6 months; HR=0.494, 95% CI: 0.335-0.728, p < 0.0001). These findings remained consistent after PSM, with hazard ratios of 0.589 for OS and 0.540 for PFS. The objective response rate was also substantially higher in the combination arm than in the monotherapy arm (55.4% vs 30.9%, p = 0.004). Subgroup analyses revealed that the survival advantage was confined to patients with Cheng's type I-II PVTT, whereas no significant benefit was observed in those with type III-IV disease. Furthermore, salvage hepatectomy was an independent protective factor for survival in 33 cases (24.8%), with a significantly higher conversion rate in the combined treatment group (30.8%). Both treatment groups had comparable and manageable safety profiles.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Lenvatinib in combination with SBRT confers meaningful advantages in both survival and tumor response over lenvatinib monotherapy in individuals with uHCC and PVTT, particularly among those with Cheng's type I-II involvement. Moreover, this multimodal approach appears to be an effective strategy for achieving tumor downstaging and enabling subsequent salvage hepatectomy.</p>","PeriodicalId":15906,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hepatocellular Carcinoma","volume":"13 ","pages":"589137"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13281888/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hepatocellular Carcinoma","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/JHC.S589137","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To investigate whether adding stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) to lenvatinib improves outcomes for patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC) and portal vein tumor thrombosis (PVTT).

Methods: This retrospective cohort study enrolled 133 cases of uHCC with PVTT treated with either lenvatinib plus SBRT (n = 65) or lenvatinib alone (n = 68) between 2021 and 2023. To minimize baseline imbalances, 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM, caliper width, 0.02) was performed. The primary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS).

Results: Across the full study population, patients receiving lenvatinib in combination with SBRT experienced significantly longer median OS relative to those who received lenvatinib alone (24.7 vs 16.4 months; HR=0.521, 95% CI: 0.338-0.802, p = 0.003). A similar advantage was observed for PFS (13.0 vs 8.6 months; HR=0.494, 95% CI: 0.335-0.728, p < 0.0001). These findings remained consistent after PSM, with hazard ratios of 0.589 for OS and 0.540 for PFS. The objective response rate was also substantially higher in the combination arm than in the monotherapy arm (55.4% vs 30.9%, p = 0.004). Subgroup analyses revealed that the survival advantage was confined to patients with Cheng's type I-II PVTT, whereas no significant benefit was observed in those with type III-IV disease. Furthermore, salvage hepatectomy was an independent protective factor for survival in 33 cases (24.8%), with a significantly higher conversion rate in the combined treatment group (30.8%). Both treatment groups had comparable and manageable safety profiles.

Conclusion: Lenvatinib in combination with SBRT confers meaningful advantages in both survival and tumor response over lenvatinib monotherapy in individuals with uHCC and PVTT, particularly among those with Cheng's type I-II involvement. Moreover, this multimodal approach appears to be an effective strategy for achieving tumor downstaging and enabling subsequent salvage hepatectomy.

立体定向放疗与Lenvatinib治疗不可切除肝细胞癌合并门静脉肿瘤血栓的疗效比较:倾向评分匹配队列分析。
目的:探讨立体定向放射治疗(SBRT)加lenvatinib是否能改善不可切除肝细胞癌(uHCC)和门静脉肿瘤血栓形成(PVTT)患者的预后。方法:该回顾性队列研究纳入了133例uHCC合并PVTT的患者,在2021年至2023年间,lenvatinib加SBRT (n = 65)或lenvatinib单独治疗(n = 68)。为了尽量减少基线失衡,进行了1:1的倾向评分匹配(PSM,卡尺宽度,0.02)。主要终点是总生存期(OS)和无进展生存期(PFS)。结果:在整个研究人群中,与单独接受lenvatinib的患者相比,接受lenvatinib联合SBRT的患者的中位生存期明显更长(24.7个月vs 16.4个月;HR=0.521, 95% CI: 0.338-0.802, p = 0.003)。PFS也有类似的优势(13.0 vs 8.6个月;HR=0.494, 95% CI: 0.335-0.728, p < 0.0001)。这些发现在PSM后保持一致,OS的风险比为0.589,PFS的风险比为0.540。联合治疗组的客观缓解率也明显高于单药治疗组(55.4% vs 30.9%, p = 0.004)。亚组分析显示,生存优势仅限于Cheng的I-II型PVTT患者,而在III-IV型疾病患者中没有观察到显著的获益。此外,挽救性肝切除术是33例(24.8%)患者生存的独立保护因素,联合治疗组的转换率明显更高(30.8%)。两个治疗组的安全性具有可比性和可管理性。结论:Lenvatinib联合SBRT在uHCC和PVTT患者的生存和肿瘤反应方面都比Lenvatinib单药治疗有显著优势,特别是在Cheng的I-II型患者中。此外,这种多模式的方法似乎是一种有效的策略,以实现肿瘤的低分期和随后的挽救性肝切除术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
2.40%
发文量
108
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书