Development and validation of a prediction model for activities of daily living dysfunction among stroke survivors: insights from the CHARLS cohort.

IF 6 2区 医学 Q1 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Hongying Ren, Wen Wang, Li Tao, Xiaoshu Song, Bin Bai, Min Wang, Xiaoyan Li
{"title":"Development and validation of a prediction model for activities of daily living dysfunction among stroke survivors: insights from the CHARLS cohort.","authors":"Hongying Ren, Wen Wang, Li Tao, Xiaoshu Song, Bin Bai, Min Wang, Xiaoyan Li","doi":"10.1186/s12984-026-02063-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Activities of daily living (ADL) dysfunction is prevalent in stroke survivors and places a significant burden on both patients and healthcare systems. Improved identification of individuals with ADL dysfunction may facilitate more targeted rehabilitation strategies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (CHARLS) provided the data. A training set (n = 906) and a validation set (n = 389) were randomly selected from a total of 1,295 stroke survivors. Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression and multivariable logistic regression were used to select predictors and develop a prediction model, which was visualized using a nomogram. SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) were applied for model interpretation. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), calibration analysis, and decision curve analysis (DCA) were used to evaluate the model's performance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ten predictors were identified, including CES-D scores, age, sleep time duration, drinking, lung disease, social contact, falls, hypertension, arthritis, and sex. SHAP analysis identified CES-D scores as the most influential predictors. The model demonstrated acceptable discriminative ability in both the training set (AUC: 0.76, 95% CI: 0.73-0.79) and validation set (AUC: 0.76, 95% CI: 0.72-0.81). Calibration was satisfactory in both the training and validation sets (Hosmer-Lemeshow test, P = 0.16 and P = 0.99, respectively). Positive clinical usefulness was suggested by DCA analysis.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The model demonstrated acceptable predictive performance and may assist in identifying individuals with prevalent ADL dysfunction. Further external validation is required before broader clinical application.</p>","PeriodicalId":16384,"journal":{"name":"Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13548701/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12984-026-02063-x","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Activities of daily living (ADL) dysfunction is prevalent in stroke survivors and places a significant burden on both patients and healthcare systems. Improved identification of individuals with ADL dysfunction may facilitate more targeted rehabilitation strategies.

Methods: The China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (CHARLS) provided the data. A training set (n = 906) and a validation set (n = 389) were randomly selected from a total of 1,295 stroke survivors. Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression and multivariable logistic regression were used to select predictors and develop a prediction model, which was visualized using a nomogram. SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) were applied for model interpretation. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), calibration analysis, and decision curve analysis (DCA) were used to evaluate the model's performance.

Results: Ten predictors were identified, including CES-D scores, age, sleep time duration, drinking, lung disease, social contact, falls, hypertension, arthritis, and sex. SHAP analysis identified CES-D scores as the most influential predictors. The model demonstrated acceptable discriminative ability in both the training set (AUC: 0.76, 95% CI: 0.73-0.79) and validation set (AUC: 0.76, 95% CI: 0.72-0.81). Calibration was satisfactory in both the training and validation sets (Hosmer-Lemeshow test, P = 0.16 and P = 0.99, respectively). Positive clinical usefulness was suggested by DCA analysis.

Conclusions: The model demonstrated acceptable predictive performance and may assist in identifying individuals with prevalent ADL dysfunction. Further external validation is required before broader clinical application.

卒中幸存者日常生活功能障碍预测模型的开发和验证:CHARLS队列的见解
背景:日常生活活动(ADL)功能障碍在中风幸存者中普遍存在,并给患者和医疗保健系统带来了重大负担。改善对ADL功能障碍个体的识别可能有助于更有针对性的康复策略。方法:采用中国健康与退休纵向研究(CHARLS)提供资料。训练集(n = 906)和验证集(n = 389)从总共1295名中风幸存者中随机选择。采用最小绝对收缩和选择算子(LASSO)回归和多变量逻辑回归来选择预测因子并建立预测模型,并使用模态图进行可视化。采用SHapley加性解释(SHAP)进行模型解释。采用受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AUC)、校准分析和决策曲线分析(DCA)来评价模型的性能。结果:确定了10个预测因素,包括CES-D评分、年龄、睡眠时间、饮酒、肺部疾病、社会接触、跌倒、高血压、关节炎和性别。SHAP分析确定CES-D分数是最具影响力的预测因子。该模型在训练集(AUC: 0.76, 95% CI: 0.73-0.79)和验证集(AUC: 0.76, 95% CI: 0.72-0.81)均表现出可接受的判别能力。校准在训练集和验证集均令人满意(Hosmer-Lemeshow检验,P = 0.16和P = 0.99)。DCA分析提示临床应用价值。结论:该模型表现出可接受的预测性能,可能有助于识别普遍ADL功能障碍的个体。在更广泛的临床应用之前,需要进一步的外部验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation 工程技术-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
9.60
自引率
3.90%
发文量
122
审稿时长
24 months
期刊介绍: Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation considers manuscripts on all aspects of research that result from cross-fertilization of the fields of neuroscience, biomedical engineering, and physical medicine & rehabilitation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书