A review of radiological characteristics and patterns of fat necrosis after different autologous breast surgery techniques.

IF 5.6 2区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Nieke N P M Smeins, Zoë M A Kuijlaars, Silvia Pérez Rodrigo, Esther M Heuts, Andrzej Piatkowski, Thiemo J A van Nijnatten
{"title":"A review of radiological characteristics and patterns of fat necrosis after different autologous breast surgery techniques.","authors":"Nieke N P M Smeins, Zoë M A Kuijlaars, Silvia Pérez Rodrigo, Esther M Heuts, Andrzej Piatkowski, Thiemo J A van Nijnatten","doi":"10.1186/s13244-026-02330-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The aim of this systematic review was to compare the radiological characteristics of fat necrosis distribution and morphology of tissue flaps versus autologous fat transfer (AFT) on ultrasound (US), mammography (MG), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), in order to improve diagnostic accuracy and guide treatment decisions.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This systematic review was performed according to the PRISMA guidelines. A literature search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, and Scopus databases, identifying studies published after 2005. Eligible studies included female patients undergoing breast surgery using flaps or AFT, with fat necrosis assessed on US, MG, or MRI.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventeen studies (13 AFT, 4 flap surgery) were included. Imaging was performed 1 to 240 months postoperatively. The mean prevalence of fat necrosis ranged from 12.5 to 23.6% for studies on flap surgery (n = 4), versus 7.3 to 82.9% for AFT (n = 5). On US, fat necrosis exhibited diverse echogenicity and cystic components often without vascularity, for both flap surgery and AFT. MG characteristics included radiolucent oil cysts with calcifications. MRI showed nonenhancing hypointense lesions with hyperintense borders on T1-weighted and T2-weighted fat-suppressed images. After flap surgery, fat necrosis was predominantly located at the peripheral margins of the flap, whereas in AFT it was more diffusely distributed.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Radiological characteristics of fat necrosis are generally comparable between tissue flaps and AFT, although a difference was observed in the prevalence and distribution of fat necrosis between the two techniques. However, literature is limited, and additional research is needed to be able to refine the radiological definition of fat necrosis.</p><p><strong>Key points: </strong>Identifying radiological differences between fat necrosis in tissue flaps and autologous fat transfer may improve diagnosis by distinguishing typical from atypical fat necrosis presentations. Radiological characteristics of fat necrosis are largely comparable between flaps and autologous fat transfer, although imaging features evolve over time and distribution patterns might differ. Understanding radiological characteristics of fat necrosis across breast surgery techniques is essential for accurate diagnosis, guiding treatment decisions, and reducing biopsies and patient distress. Distribution patterns of fat necrosis may aid in improving diagnostic consistency.</p>","PeriodicalId":13639,"journal":{"name":"Insights into Imaging","volume":"17 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13287354/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Insights into Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13244-026-02330-4","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The aim of this systematic review was to compare the radiological characteristics of fat necrosis distribution and morphology of tissue flaps versus autologous fat transfer (AFT) on ultrasound (US), mammography (MG), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), in order to improve diagnostic accuracy and guide treatment decisions.

Materials and methods: This systematic review was performed according to the PRISMA guidelines. A literature search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, and Scopus databases, identifying studies published after 2005. Eligible studies included female patients undergoing breast surgery using flaps or AFT, with fat necrosis assessed on US, MG, or MRI.

Results: Seventeen studies (13 AFT, 4 flap surgery) were included. Imaging was performed 1 to 240 months postoperatively. The mean prevalence of fat necrosis ranged from 12.5 to 23.6% for studies on flap surgery (n = 4), versus 7.3 to 82.9% for AFT (n = 5). On US, fat necrosis exhibited diverse echogenicity and cystic components often without vascularity, for both flap surgery and AFT. MG characteristics included radiolucent oil cysts with calcifications. MRI showed nonenhancing hypointense lesions with hyperintense borders on T1-weighted and T2-weighted fat-suppressed images. After flap surgery, fat necrosis was predominantly located at the peripheral margins of the flap, whereas in AFT it was more diffusely distributed.

Conclusion: Radiological characteristics of fat necrosis are generally comparable between tissue flaps and AFT, although a difference was observed in the prevalence and distribution of fat necrosis between the two techniques. However, literature is limited, and additional research is needed to be able to refine the radiological definition of fat necrosis.

Key points: Identifying radiological differences between fat necrosis in tissue flaps and autologous fat transfer may improve diagnosis by distinguishing typical from atypical fat necrosis presentations. Radiological characteristics of fat necrosis are largely comparable between flaps and autologous fat transfer, although imaging features evolve over time and distribution patterns might differ. Understanding radiological characteristics of fat necrosis across breast surgery techniques is essential for accurate diagnosis, guiding treatment decisions, and reducing biopsies and patient distress. Distribution patterns of fat necrosis may aid in improving diagnostic consistency.

不同自体乳房手术技术后脂肪坏死的影像学特征和模式综述。
背景:本系统综述的目的是比较脂肪坏死组织瓣与自体脂肪移植(AFT)在超声(US)、乳房x线摄影(MG)和磁共振成像(MRI)上的放射学特征,以提高诊断准确性和指导治疗决策。材料和方法:本系统综述按照PRISMA指南进行。在PubMed、Embase和Scopus数据库中进行文献检索,确定2005年以后发表的研究。符合条件的研究包括使用皮瓣或AFT进行乳房手术的女性患者,并通过US、MG或MRI评估脂肪坏死。结果:纳入17项研究(13例AFT, 4例皮瓣手术)。术后1 ~ 240个月进行影像学检查。皮瓣手术的平均脂肪坏死发生率为12.5 - 23.6% (n = 4),而AFT手术的平均脂肪坏死发生率为7.3 - 82.9% (n = 5)。在超声上,脂肪坏死表现出不同的回声和囊性成分,通常没有血管,无论是皮瓣手术还是AFT。MG特征包括带钙化的放射性油囊肿。MRI在t1和t2加权脂肪抑制图像上显示无增强的低信号病变伴高信号边界。皮瓣术后脂肪坏死主要位于皮瓣外周缘,而在AFT中脂肪坏死更为弥漫性分布。结论:脂肪坏死的放射学特征在组织皮瓣和AFT之间大致相当,尽管在两种技术之间观察到脂肪坏死的患病率和分布差异。然而,文献是有限的,需要进一步的研究来完善脂肪坏死的放射学定义。重点:鉴别组织瓣内脂肪坏死和自体脂肪转移的影像学差异可以通过区分典型和非典型脂肪坏死的表现来提高诊断。脂肪坏死的放射学特征在皮瓣和自体脂肪移植之间很大程度上是相似的,尽管成像特征随着时间的推移而变化,分布模式可能不同。了解乳房手术技术中脂肪坏死的放射学特征对于准确诊断、指导治疗决策、减少活检和患者痛苦至关重要。脂肪坏死的分布模式有助于提高诊断的一致性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Insights into Imaging
Insights into Imaging Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
4.30%
发文量
182
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: Insights into Imaging (I³) is a peer-reviewed open access journal published under the brand SpringerOpen. All content published in the journal is freely available online to anyone, anywhere! I³ continuously updates scientific knowledge and progress in best-practice standards in radiology through the publication of original articles and state-of-the-art reviews and opinions, along with recommendations and statements from the leading radiological societies in Europe. Founded by the European Society of Radiology (ESR), I³ creates a platform for educational material, guidelines and recommendations, and a forum for topics of controversy. A balanced combination of review articles, original papers, short communications from European radiological congresses and information on society matters makes I³ an indispensable source for current information in this field. I³ is owned by the ESR, however authors retain copyright to their article according to the Creative Commons Attribution License (see Copyright and License Agreement). All articles can be read, redistributed and reused for free, as long as the author of the original work is cited properly. The open access fees (article-processing charges) for this journal are kindly sponsored by ESR for all Members. The journal went open access in 2012, which means that all articles published since then are freely available online.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书