Adverse Events after Colorectal Polypectomy in Patients with Amyloidosis: Risk Assessment Using Propensity Score Matching.

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Digestion Pub Date : 2026-06-22 DOI:10.1159/000551743
Hiroshi Sawaguchi, Tadanobu Nagaya, Tomoyuki Nakajima, Takuma Okamura, Mai Iwaya, Takeshi Uehara, Nagaaki Katoh, Yoshiki Sekijima, Yugo Iwaya
{"title":"Adverse Events after Colorectal Polypectomy in Patients with Amyloidosis: Risk Assessment Using Propensity Score Matching.","authors":"Hiroshi Sawaguchi, Tadanobu Nagaya, Tomoyuki Nakajima, Takuma Okamura, Mai Iwaya, Takeshi Uehara, Nagaaki Katoh, Yoshiki Sekijima, Yugo Iwaya","doi":"10.1159/000551743","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Amyloidosis may increase the risk of post-polypectomy bleeding due to mucosal and vascular fragility. We compared adverse events after colorectal polypectomy between patients with and without amyloidosis and explored risk factors for immediate post-polypectomy bleeding (IPPB).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective investigation included 21 amyloidosis patients (71 polyps) and 110 non-amyloidosis patients (298 polyps) who underwent cold snare polypectomy (CSP) or endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) between 2005 and 2024. Propensity score matching compared IPPB, delayed bleeding, and perforation. In the matched cohort, risk factors for IPPB were evaluated using generalized estimating equation (GEE) logistic regression clustered by patient ID. In the amyloidosis group, histological predictors (amyloid deposition and location) were assessed, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis evaluated polyp size.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>IPPB occurred significantly more frequently in the amyloidosis group than in the matched non-amyloidosis group (p = 0.008). In multivariable GEE analysis, amyloidosis remained independently associated with IPPB (adjusted OR 3.20, 95% CI: 1.14-8.99; p = 0.027). In amyloidosis patients, muscularis mucosae deposition was associated with IPPB (p = 0.017); multivariate analysis suggested muscularis mucosae deposition (OR 6.55, 95% CI: 1.59-27.00; p = 0.009) and EMR (OR 8.26, 95% CI: 1.41-48.60; p = 0.020) as predictors. ROC analysis yielded an area under the ROC curve of 0.66 with a 6-mm cutoff.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Amyloidosis was independently associated with increased IPPB risk after colorectal polypectomy. Muscularis mucosae deposition and EMR may help identify higher-risk lesions in amyloidosis, and CSP may be considered when feasible to reduce bleeding risk.</p>","PeriodicalId":11315,"journal":{"name":"Digestion","volume":" ","pages":"1-11"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Digestion","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000551743","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Amyloidosis may increase the risk of post-polypectomy bleeding due to mucosal and vascular fragility. We compared adverse events after colorectal polypectomy between patients with and without amyloidosis and explored risk factors for immediate post-polypectomy bleeding (IPPB).

Methods: This retrospective investigation included 21 amyloidosis patients (71 polyps) and 110 non-amyloidosis patients (298 polyps) who underwent cold snare polypectomy (CSP) or endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) between 2005 and 2024. Propensity score matching compared IPPB, delayed bleeding, and perforation. In the matched cohort, risk factors for IPPB were evaluated using generalized estimating equation (GEE) logistic regression clustered by patient ID. In the amyloidosis group, histological predictors (amyloid deposition and location) were assessed, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis evaluated polyp size.

Results: IPPB occurred significantly more frequently in the amyloidosis group than in the matched non-amyloidosis group (p = 0.008). In multivariable GEE analysis, amyloidosis remained independently associated with IPPB (adjusted OR 3.20, 95% CI: 1.14-8.99; p = 0.027). In amyloidosis patients, muscularis mucosae deposition was associated with IPPB (p = 0.017); multivariate analysis suggested muscularis mucosae deposition (OR 6.55, 95% CI: 1.59-27.00; p = 0.009) and EMR (OR 8.26, 95% CI: 1.41-48.60; p = 0.020) as predictors. ROC analysis yielded an area under the ROC curve of 0.66 with a 6-mm cutoff.

Conclusions: Amyloidosis was independently associated with increased IPPB risk after colorectal polypectomy. Muscularis mucosae deposition and EMR may help identify higher-risk lesions in amyloidosis, and CSP may be considered when feasible to reduce bleeding risk.

淀粉样变性患者结肠息肉切除术后的不良事件:使用倾向评分匹配的风险评估。
简介:由于粘膜和血管的脆弱,淀粉样变可能增加息肉切除术后出血的风险。我们比较了有淀粉样变性和无淀粉样变性的结直肠息肉切除术后的不良事件,并探讨了息肉切除术后立即出血(IPPB)的危险因素。方法:回顾性调查2005年至2024年间行冷陷阱息肉切除术(CSP)或内镜粘膜切除术(EMR)的21例淀粉样变性患者(71例息肉)和110例非淀粉样变性患者(298例息肉)。倾向评分匹配比较IPPB,延迟出血和穿孔。在匹配的队列中,使用广义估计方程(GEE)逻辑回归评估IPPB的危险因素,并按患者ID聚类。在淀粉样变组中,评估组织学预测因子(淀粉样蛋白沉积和位置),并通过受试者工作特征(ROC)分析评估息肉大小。结果:淀粉样变组IPPB发生率明显高于非淀粉样变组(p = 0.008)。在多变量GEE分析中,淀粉样变性仍然与IPPB独立相关(校正OR 3.20, 95% CI: 1.14-8.99; p = 0.027)。淀粉样变患者中,粘膜肌层沉积与IPPB相关(p = 0.017);多因素分析表明,肌层粘膜沉积(OR 6.55, 95% CI: 1.59-27.00; p = 0.009)和EMR (OR 8.26, 95% CI: 1.41-48.60; p = 0.020)是预测因子。ROC分析得出ROC曲线下面积为0.66,截止时间为6 mm。结论:淀粉样变与结直肠息肉切除术后IPPB风险增加独立相关。粘膜肌层沉积和EMR可能有助于识别淀粉样变性的高风险病变,可行时可考虑CSP以降低出血风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Digestion
Digestion 医学-胃肠肝病学
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
39
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: ''Digestion'' concentrates on clinical research reports: in addition to editorials and reviews, the journal features sections on Stomach/Esophagus, Bowel, Neuro-Gastroenterology, Liver/Bile, Pancreas, Metabolism/Nutrition and Gastrointestinal Oncology. Papers cover physiology in humans, metabolic studies and clinical work on the etiology, diagnosis, and therapy of human diseases. It is thus especially cut out for gastroenterologists employed in hospitals and outpatient units. Moreover, the journal''s coverage of studies on the metabolism and effects of therapeutic drugs carries considerable value for clinicians and investigators beyond the immediate field of gastroenterology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书