Analytical Evaluation of a Point-of-Care Platform for Glycated Hemoglobin and N-Terminal Pro-B-Type Natriuretic Peptide Testing in Cardiometabolic Care.

IF 1.3 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Cardiology Research Pub Date : 2026-06-05 eCollection Date: 2026-06-01 DOI:10.14740/cr2220
Perrin Ngougni Pokem, Ali Khatib, Iman Azariouh Kaddouri, Damien Gruson
{"title":"Analytical Evaluation of a Point-of-Care Platform for Glycated Hemoglobin and N-Terminal Pro-B-Type Natriuretic Peptide Testing in Cardiometabolic Care.","authors":"Perrin Ngougni Pokem, Ali Khatib, Iman Azariouh Kaddouri, Damien Gruson","doi":"10.14740/cr2220","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Heart failure is a frequent complication of diabetes, highlighting the importance of integrated cardiometabolic assessment. Glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) and N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) represent complementary biomarkers reflecting glycemic control and myocardial stress. Point-of-care testing (POCT) platforms may facilitate decentralized diagnostics and shorten analytical turnaround time. The aim of this study was to evaluate the analytical performance of the AFIAS-3 point-of-care fluorescence immunoassay platform for HbA1c and NT-proBNP measurements in comparison with established central laboratory methods.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This single-center verification study included 50 patient samples for each analyte. HbA1c measurements obtained using AFIAS-3 were compared with Tosoh G8 high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC), while NT-proBNP measurements were compared with the cobas 8000 electrochemiluminescence immunoassay. Analytical precision and accuracy were assessed using manufacturer quality control materials. Method comparison was performed using Passing-Bablok regression, Bland-Altman analysis, and Spearman correlation. Agreement at clinical thresholds was evaluated using Cohen's kappa statistics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For HbA1c, analytical precision was excellent, with coefficients of variation of 1.9% and 1.8%. Correlation with the reference method was strong (r = 0.98), and the mean bias was minimal (-0.03%). Agreement at the diagnostic threshold of 6.5% was excellent (κ = 0.92). For NT-proBNP, coefficients of variation were 5.3% and 15.4%. Correlation with the central laboratory method was very high (r = 0.99), although proportional bias was observed at higher concentrations (slope 1.24). Agreement at clinically relevant thresholds remained substantial.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The AFIAS-3 POCT platform demonstrated excellent analytical agreement for HbA1c and acceptable agreement for NT-proBNP at clinically relevant thresholds. Dual biomarker POCT may support decentralized cardiometabolic diagnostics, although NT-proBNP values at higher concentrations should be interpreted cautiously.</p>","PeriodicalId":9424,"journal":{"name":"Cardiology Research","volume":"17 3","pages":"190-196"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13278697/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cardiology Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14740/cr2220","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/6/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Heart failure is a frequent complication of diabetes, highlighting the importance of integrated cardiometabolic assessment. Glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) and N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) represent complementary biomarkers reflecting glycemic control and myocardial stress. Point-of-care testing (POCT) platforms may facilitate decentralized diagnostics and shorten analytical turnaround time. The aim of this study was to evaluate the analytical performance of the AFIAS-3 point-of-care fluorescence immunoassay platform for HbA1c and NT-proBNP measurements in comparison with established central laboratory methods.

Methods: This single-center verification study included 50 patient samples for each analyte. HbA1c measurements obtained using AFIAS-3 were compared with Tosoh G8 high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC), while NT-proBNP measurements were compared with the cobas 8000 electrochemiluminescence immunoassay. Analytical precision and accuracy were assessed using manufacturer quality control materials. Method comparison was performed using Passing-Bablok regression, Bland-Altman analysis, and Spearman correlation. Agreement at clinical thresholds was evaluated using Cohen's kappa statistics.

Results: For HbA1c, analytical precision was excellent, with coefficients of variation of 1.9% and 1.8%. Correlation with the reference method was strong (r = 0.98), and the mean bias was minimal (-0.03%). Agreement at the diagnostic threshold of 6.5% was excellent (κ = 0.92). For NT-proBNP, coefficients of variation were 5.3% and 15.4%. Correlation with the central laboratory method was very high (r = 0.99), although proportional bias was observed at higher concentrations (slope 1.24). Agreement at clinically relevant thresholds remained substantial.

Conclusions: The AFIAS-3 POCT platform demonstrated excellent analytical agreement for HbA1c and acceptable agreement for NT-proBNP at clinically relevant thresholds. Dual biomarker POCT may support decentralized cardiometabolic diagnostics, although NT-proBNP values at higher concentrations should be interpreted cautiously.

在心脏代谢护理中糖化血红蛋白和n端前b型利钠肽检测的护理点平台的分析评价。
背景:心力衰竭是糖尿病的常见并发症,强调了综合心脏代谢评估的重要性。糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)和n端前b型利钠肽(NT-proBNP)是反映血糖控制和心肌应激的互补生物标志物。即时检测(POCT)平台可以促进分散诊断并缩短分析周转时间。本研究的目的是评估afiaas -3即时荧光免疫分析平台对HbA1c和NT-proBNP测量的分析性能,并与既定的中心实验室方法进行比较。方法:该单中心验证研究包括50例患者样本,每种分析物。使用afia3获得的HbA1c测量值与Tosoh G8高效液相色谱(HPLC)进行比较,而NT-proBNP测量值与cobas 8000电化学发光免疫分析法进行比较。分析精密度和准确度采用制造商质量控制材料进行评估。方法采用Passing-Bablok回归、Bland-Altman分析和Spearman相关进行比较。采用Cohen's kappa统计评估临床阈值的一致性。结果:HbA1c分析精密度高,变异系数分别为1.9%和1.8%。与参考方法相关性强(r = 0.98),平均偏差最小(-0.03%)。6.5%诊断阈值的一致性极好(κ = 0.92)。NT-proBNP变异系数分别为5.3%和15.4%。与中心实验室方法的相关性非常高(r = 0.99),尽管在较高浓度下观察到比例偏差(斜率1.24)。在临床相关阈值上的一致性仍然很大。结论:AFIAS-3 POCT平台在HbA1c和NT-proBNP的临床相关阈值上表现出良好的分析一致性。双重生物标志物POCT可能支持分散的心脏代谢诊断,尽管NT-proBNP值在较高浓度时应谨慎解释。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cardiology Research
Cardiology Research CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
42
期刊介绍: Cardiology Research is an open access, peer-reviewed, international journal. All submissions relating to basic research and clinical practice of cardiology and cardiovascular medicine are in this journal''s scope. This journal focuses on publishing original research and observations in all cardiovascular medicine aspects. Manuscript types include original article, review, case report, short communication, book review, letter to the editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书