Receptor discordance between primary tumors and nodal metastases and correlation with the 21-gene recurrence score in early-stage, estrogen receptor-positive, node-positive breast cancer.

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Serena Zheng, Peggy Sullivan, Kumkum Vadehra, Jiyoon Kim, Alexis Levee, Rena Callahan, Mediget Teshome, Chi-Hong Tseng, Aditya Bardia, Nimmi S Kapoor
{"title":"Receptor discordance between primary tumors and nodal metastases and correlation with the 21-gene recurrence score in early-stage, estrogen receptor-positive, node-positive breast cancer.","authors":"Serena Zheng, Peggy Sullivan, Kumkum Vadehra, Jiyoon Kim, Alexis Levee, Rena Callahan, Mediget Teshome, Chi-Hong Tseng, Aditya Bardia, Nimmi S Kapoor","doi":"10.1007/s10549-026-08009-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In estrogen receptor (ER)-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer, systemic therapy decisions are often made on the biomarker status of the primary tumor, along with the Oncotype DX Recurrence Score<sup>®</sup> (RS). Biomarker testing of nodal metastases is not routine, despite reported receptor discordance. We quantified ER/PR/HER2 discordance between primary tumors and axillary lymph node metastases and evaluated associations with RS and clinicopathologic features.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective study of women with stage II-III, ER-positive, HER2-negative, node-positive invasive breast cancer who underwent upfront surgery and Oncotype DX testing of the primary tumor between 2016 and 2020. ER, PR, and HER2 immunohistochemistry (IHC) was performed on archived nodal metastases. Discordance in ER/PR percent positivity and HER2 IHC score between primary and lymph node metastases was scored ordinally from 0 to 2 for no, mild, or marked difference, respectively. Associations with RS, tumor and nodal burden, and treatment were analyzed using standard parametric and nonparametric tests with statistical significance set at p < 0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 555 patients with RS testing, 91 patients met inclusion criteria and 73 had available nodal tissue. Discordance in at least one receptor was high overall, occurring in 56/73 (77%) cases. The discordance rate for ER was 15%, PR was 32%, and HER2 was 66% (58% mild, 8% marked). One case demonstrated loss of ER positivity in the node, and 14 demonstrated loss of PR positivity in the node; no primary HER2-negative tumor converted to HER2-positive (IHC 3+) disease in the node. Greater amount of HER2 discordance was associated with larger primary tumors and larger size of nodal metastatic deposits. Higher RS correlated with lower primary ER and PR expression and higher volume of nodal burden (p < 0.05 for each) but was not significantly associated with receptor discordance.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Receptor discordance between primary tumors and nodal metastases is common, with most shifts occurring within the HER2-spectrum. There was a trend toward higher RS and ER or HER2-receptor discordance. HER2 discordance was also associated with larger tumor size and larger size of nodal metastasis. As strategies emerge to target HER2-low cohorts and to include ER-low/HER2-negative disease within treatment regimens for TNBC, it may become important to consider receptor testing of nodal disease in the future.</p>","PeriodicalId":9133,"journal":{"name":"Breast Cancer Research and Treatment","volume":"217 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13287169/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Breast Cancer Research and Treatment","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-026-08009-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: In estrogen receptor (ER)-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer, systemic therapy decisions are often made on the biomarker status of the primary tumor, along with the Oncotype DX Recurrence Score® (RS). Biomarker testing of nodal metastases is not routine, despite reported receptor discordance. We quantified ER/PR/HER2 discordance between primary tumors and axillary lymph node metastases and evaluated associations with RS and clinicopathologic features.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective study of women with stage II-III, ER-positive, HER2-negative, node-positive invasive breast cancer who underwent upfront surgery and Oncotype DX testing of the primary tumor between 2016 and 2020. ER, PR, and HER2 immunohistochemistry (IHC) was performed on archived nodal metastases. Discordance in ER/PR percent positivity and HER2 IHC score between primary and lymph node metastases was scored ordinally from 0 to 2 for no, mild, or marked difference, respectively. Associations with RS, tumor and nodal burden, and treatment were analyzed using standard parametric and nonparametric tests with statistical significance set at p < 0.05.

Results: Of 555 patients with RS testing, 91 patients met inclusion criteria and 73 had available nodal tissue. Discordance in at least one receptor was high overall, occurring in 56/73 (77%) cases. The discordance rate for ER was 15%, PR was 32%, and HER2 was 66% (58% mild, 8% marked). One case demonstrated loss of ER positivity in the node, and 14 demonstrated loss of PR positivity in the node; no primary HER2-negative tumor converted to HER2-positive (IHC 3+) disease in the node. Greater amount of HER2 discordance was associated with larger primary tumors and larger size of nodal metastatic deposits. Higher RS correlated with lower primary ER and PR expression and higher volume of nodal burden (p < 0.05 for each) but was not significantly associated with receptor discordance.

Conclusions: Receptor discordance between primary tumors and nodal metastases is common, with most shifts occurring within the HER2-spectrum. There was a trend toward higher RS and ER or HER2-receptor discordance. HER2 discordance was also associated with larger tumor size and larger size of nodal metastasis. As strategies emerge to target HER2-low cohorts and to include ER-low/HER2-negative disease within treatment regimens for TNBC, it may become important to consider receptor testing of nodal disease in the future.

早期、雌激素受体阳性、淋巴结阳性乳腺癌原发肿瘤与淋巴结转移之间的受体不一致及其与21基因复发评分的相关性
背景:在雌激素受体(ER)阳性、her2阴性的乳腺癌中,通常根据原发肿瘤的生物标志物状态以及Oncotype DX复发评分®(RS)来决定全身治疗。尽管有报道的受体不一致,但淋巴结转移的生物标志物检测并不常规。我们量化了原发肿瘤和腋窝淋巴结转移之间的ER/PR/HER2不一致,并评估了RS和临床病理特征的相关性。方法:我们对2016年至2020年期间接受前期手术和原发肿瘤Oncotype DX检测的II-III期、er阳性、her2阴性、淋巴结阳性浸润性乳腺癌患者进行了回顾性研究。对存档的淋巴结转移进行ER、PR和HER2免疫组化(IHC)。原发性和淋巴结转移之间的ER/PR百分比阳性和HER2 IHC评分的不一致性依次从0到2评分,分别为无,轻度或显著差异。使用标准参数检验和非参数检验分析RS、肿瘤和淋巴结负担以及治疗的相关性,具有统计学显著性p。结果:在555例RS检测患者中,91例患者符合纳入标准,73例患者有可用的淋巴结组织。至少一种受体的不一致性总体上很高,发生在56/73(77%)的病例中。ER不一致率为15%,PR为32%,HER2为66%(轻度58%,显著8%)。1例淋巴结ER阳性丧失,14例淋巴结PR阳性丧失;淋巴结内无原发性her2阴性肿瘤转化为her2阳性(IHC 3+)疾病。HER2不一致程度越大,原发肿瘤越大,淋巴结转移灶越大。较高的RS与较低的原发性ER和PR表达以及较高的淋巴结负担体积相关(p结论:原发性肿瘤和淋巴结转移之间的受体不一致是常见的,大多数转移发生在her2谱内。RS和ER或her2受体不一致有升高的趋势。HER2不一致也与较大的肿瘤大小和较大的淋巴结转移有关。随着针对her2低人群的策略的出现,以及在TNBC的治疗方案中纳入er低/ her2阴性疾病,将来考虑淋巴结疾病的受体检测可能变得重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
2.60%
发文量
342
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment provides the surgeon, radiotherapist, medical oncologist, endocrinologist, epidemiologist, immunologist or cell biologist investigating problems in breast cancer a single forum for communication. The journal creates a "market place" for breast cancer topics which cuts across all the usual lines of disciplines, providing a site for presenting pertinent investigations, and for discussing critical questions relevant to the entire field. It seeks to develop a new focus and new perspectives for all those concerned with breast cancer.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书