Identifying barriers to diabetes technology use: LIFESTEPS, a newly developed clinical support tool for healthcare professionals

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Gallen Geraldine, Rosso Alice, Alonso-Carril Núria, Arbeli Sima, Bahon Virginie, Brown Vanessa, Endlich Kerstin, Schleicher Verena, Hansart Audrey, Jolley Amy, Jussila Rea, Stefanowicz-Bielska Anna, Taplin Julie, Cardano Paola, Cyranka Katarzyna
{"title":"Identifying barriers to diabetes technology use: LIFESTEPS, a newly developed clinical support tool for healthcare professionals","authors":"Gallen Geraldine,&nbsp;Rosso Alice,&nbsp;Alonso-Carril Núria,&nbsp;Arbeli Sima,&nbsp;Bahon Virginie,&nbsp;Brown Vanessa,&nbsp;Endlich Kerstin,&nbsp;Schleicher Verena,&nbsp;Hansart Audrey,&nbsp;Jolley Amy,&nbsp;Jussila Rea,&nbsp;Stefanowicz-Bielska Anna,&nbsp;Taplin Julie,&nbsp;Cardano Paola,&nbsp;Cyranka Katarzyna","doi":"10.1007/s00592-026-02718-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Psychosocial, behavioural, and lifestyle-related barriers can substantially affect the uptake, continued use, and discontinuation of diabetes technology in people with type 1 diabetes (PWT1D). However, structured tools to support healthcare professionals (HCPs) in systematically exploring these barriers in routine care remain limited. To address this gap, a clinically oriented questionnaire was developed by a multidisciplinary panel of diabetes experts. This paper describes the development of the questionnaire and its preliminary evaluation in terms of clarity, comprehensibility, usability, relevance, and perceived acceptability.</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>A panel of 12 diabetes experts from 11 countries across Europe, the Middle East, and Africa (EMEA) reviewed the literature on barriers to diabetes technology use, grouped these barriers into key thematic domains, and developed a structured questionnaire that was translated into multiple languages. The questionnaire then underwent a two-round end-user evaluation involving HCPs and PWT1D to assess clarity, comprehensibility, practicality, relevance, and potential bias. Feedback from the first round informed refinement of the questionnaire before reassessment in a second round. The evaluation was descriptive and focused on end-user feedback; formal psychometric testing and hypothesis-driven validation analyses were not undertaken.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>The expert panel named the questionnaire LIFESTEPS, reflecting its core thematic domains. The questionnaire covers the following areas of discussion related to barriers to technology: psychological and relational aspects of diabetes, experience with technology and body image, and anticipation and adaptation to new technology. In the first evaluation round, feedback was obtained from 19 HCPs and 37 PWT1D recruited by panel members. Following revision of the questionnaire, a second round involving 5 HCPs and 7 PWT1D was conducted to reassess clarity and usability. Overall, participants reported that the final version of the questionnaire was understandable, perceived as easy to complete, and potentially useful for supporting discussion of barriers to diabetes technology use in clinical practice.</p><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>LIFESTEPS is a newly developed, multilingual clinical support tool designed to facilitate structured discussion of psychosocial and lifestyle-related barriers to diabetes technology use. The findings provide preliminary support for its clarity, acceptability, and perceived clinical usefulness. Further psychometric and prospective clinical evaluation is needed before broader analytical or predictive applications can be considered. Accordingly, LIFESTEPS should be interpreted as a preliminary conversation-support tool rather than as a validated measurement instrument.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":6921,"journal":{"name":"Acta Diabetologica","volume":"63 8","pages":"1421 - 1434"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00592-026-02718-0.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Diabetologica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00592-026-02718-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Psychosocial, behavioural, and lifestyle-related barriers can substantially affect the uptake, continued use, and discontinuation of diabetes technology in people with type 1 diabetes (PWT1D). However, structured tools to support healthcare professionals (HCPs) in systematically exploring these barriers in routine care remain limited. To address this gap, a clinically oriented questionnaire was developed by a multidisciplinary panel of diabetes experts. This paper describes the development of the questionnaire and its preliminary evaluation in terms of clarity, comprehensibility, usability, relevance, and perceived acceptability.

Methods

A panel of 12 diabetes experts from 11 countries across Europe, the Middle East, and Africa (EMEA) reviewed the literature on barriers to diabetes technology use, grouped these barriers into key thematic domains, and developed a structured questionnaire that was translated into multiple languages. The questionnaire then underwent a two-round end-user evaluation involving HCPs and PWT1D to assess clarity, comprehensibility, practicality, relevance, and potential bias. Feedback from the first round informed refinement of the questionnaire before reassessment in a second round. The evaluation was descriptive and focused on end-user feedback; formal psychometric testing and hypothesis-driven validation analyses were not undertaken.

Results

The expert panel named the questionnaire LIFESTEPS, reflecting its core thematic domains. The questionnaire covers the following areas of discussion related to barriers to technology: psychological and relational aspects of diabetes, experience with technology and body image, and anticipation and adaptation to new technology. In the first evaluation round, feedback was obtained from 19 HCPs and 37 PWT1D recruited by panel members. Following revision of the questionnaire, a second round involving 5 HCPs and 7 PWT1D was conducted to reassess clarity and usability. Overall, participants reported that the final version of the questionnaire was understandable, perceived as easy to complete, and potentially useful for supporting discussion of barriers to diabetes technology use in clinical practice.

Conclusions

LIFESTEPS is a newly developed, multilingual clinical support tool designed to facilitate structured discussion of psychosocial and lifestyle-related barriers to diabetes technology use. The findings provide preliminary support for its clarity, acceptability, and perceived clinical usefulness. Further psychometric and prospective clinical evaluation is needed before broader analytical or predictive applications can be considered. Accordingly, LIFESTEPS should be interpreted as a preliminary conversation-support tool rather than as a validated measurement instrument.

识别糖尿病技术使用的障碍:LIFESTEPS,一个为医疗保健专业人员新开发的临床支持工具。
背景:与社会心理、行为和生活方式相关的障碍会严重影响1型糖尿病(PWT1D)患者对糖尿病技术的吸收、持续使用和停药。然而,结构化的工具,以支持卫生保健专业人员(HCPs)系统地探索这些障碍在常规护理仍然有限。为了解决这一差距,一个多学科的糖尿病专家小组开发了一份临床导向的问卷。本文描述了问卷的开发及其在清晰度、可理解性、可用性、相关性和可接受性方面的初步评估。方法:由来自欧洲、中东和非洲(EMEA) 11个国家的12名糖尿病专家组成的小组回顾了有关糖尿病技术使用障碍的文献,将这些障碍分为关键主题领域,并编制了一份结构化问卷,该问卷被翻译成多种语言。然后对问卷进行两轮最终用户评估,包括HCPs和PWT1D,以评估问卷的清晰度、可理解性、实用性、相关性和潜在偏倚。在第二轮重新评估之前,第一轮的反馈为问卷的改进提供了信息。评价是描述性的,侧重于最终用户的反馈;没有进行正式的心理测试和假设驱动的验证分析。结果:专家小组将问卷命名为LIFESTEPS,反映了问卷的核心主题领域。问卷涵盖了以下与技术障碍有关的讨论领域:糖尿病的心理和相关方面,技术和身体形象的经验,以及对新技术的预期和适应。在第一轮评审中,小组成员从19名医护人员和37名PWT1D中获得反馈。在修改问卷后,进行了第二轮涉及5个hcp和7个PWT1D的调查,以重新评估清晰度和可用性。总的来说,参与者报告问卷的最终版本是可以理解的,被认为是容易完成的,并且对于支持糖尿病技术在临床实践中使用的障碍的讨论可能有用。结论:LIFESTEPS是一个新开发的多语言临床支持工具,旨在促进对糖尿病技术使用的社会心理和生活方式相关障碍的结构化讨论。研究结果为其清晰性、可接受性和临床实用性提供了初步支持。在考虑更广泛的分析或预测应用之前,需要进一步的心理测量和前瞻性临床评估。因此,LIFESTEPS应该被解释为一个初步的对话支持工具,而不是一个经过验证的测量工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Acta Diabetologica
Acta Diabetologica 医学-内分泌学与代谢
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
2.60%
发文量
180
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Acta Diabetologica is a journal that publishes reports of experimental and clinical research on diabetes mellitus and related metabolic diseases. Original contributions on biochemical, physiological, pathophysiological and clinical aspects of research on diabetes and metabolic diseases are welcome. Reports are published in the form of original articles, short communications and letters to the editor. Invited reviews and editorials are also published. A Methodology forum, which publishes contributions on methodological aspects of diabetes in vivo and in vitro, is also available. The Editor-in-chief will be pleased to consider articles describing new techniques (e.g., new transplantation methods, metabolic models), of innovative importance in the field of diabetes/metabolism. Finally, workshop reports are also welcome in Acta Diabetologica.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书