Population Pharmacokinetics of Intravenous Vitamin C in Adults with Sepsis: A Sub-study of the LOVIT Trial.

IF 4 2区 医学 Q1 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Clinical Pharmacokinetics Pub Date : 2026-08-01 Epub Date: 2026-06-22 DOI:10.1007/s40262-026-01648-y
Salmaan Kanji, María Patricia Hernández-Mitre, Hugues Blain, Neill K J Adhikari, Francois Lamontagne, Marie-Claude Battista, Julie Ménard, Sheila Sprague, Marie-Hélène Masse, Jason A Roberts
{"title":"Population Pharmacokinetics of Intravenous Vitamin C in Adults with Sepsis: A Sub-study of the LOVIT Trial.","authors":"Salmaan Kanji, María Patricia Hernández-Mitre, Hugues Blain, Neill K J Adhikari, Francois Lamontagne, Marie-Claude Battista, Julie Ménard, Sheila Sprague, Marie-Hélène Masse, Jason A Roberts","doi":"10.1007/s40262-026-01648-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>High-dose intravenous vitamin C was associated with increased harm in adults with sepsis requiring vasopressors in the large international LOVIT trial. This population pharmacokinetic sub-study of LOVIT aimed to characterise the pharmacokinetics of vitamin C and explore associations with patient characteristics and outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients who enrolled in the LOVIT trial were randomized to receive 50 mg/kg vitamin C every 6 hours for 96 hours or placebo. Blood samples were collected on study Days 1, 3, and 7 for plasma vitamin C quantification. Population pharmacokinetic modeling was performed, with relevant patient and treatment-related factors tested as covariates. Internal validation was conducted using bootstrap resampling (n = 1000). Univariable and multivariable analyses explored associations between 28-day mortality and patient characteristics, as well as the relationship between vitamin C exposure and severity of illness.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 464 samples from 161 patients who were randomized to vitamin C were analysed. The median age was 64 (interquartile range [IQR] 56-72) years, weight 82 (IQR, 70-94) kg, and APACHE II score 24 (IQR, 18-29); 65.2% were male. A one-compartment model best described the data, with clearance (CL) significantly influenced by CKD-EPI eGFR and APACHE II score. Population mean estimates for clearance and volume of distribution were 3.37 L/h and 45.06 L, respectively. The model was internally validated and demonstrated to be robust and stable. Although greater vitamin C exposure was observed among non-survivors versus survivors (median 1900.5 [IQR 1191.8-2548.2] vs 1017.8 [IQR 630-1836.7] mg·h/L; p < 0.001), only age (odds ratio [OR] 1.063; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.024-1.104, p = 0.001) and APACHE II score (OR 1.079; 95% CI 1.005-1.158, p = 0.036) were independently associated with 28-day mortality. Severity of illness was also predictive of vitamin C exposure.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Vitamin C pharmacokinetics are highly variable between individuals. Some of this variability can be explained by changes in glomerular filtration and APACHE II score as a measure of illness severity. Although non-survivors had greater vitamin C exposure than survivors, exposure was not independently associated with mortality.</p>","PeriodicalId":10405,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Pharmacokinetics","volume":" ","pages":"1205-1216"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Pharmacokinetics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40262-026-01648-y","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/6/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objectives: High-dose intravenous vitamin C was associated with increased harm in adults with sepsis requiring vasopressors in the large international LOVIT trial. This population pharmacokinetic sub-study of LOVIT aimed to characterise the pharmacokinetics of vitamin C and explore associations with patient characteristics and outcomes.

Methods: Patients who enrolled in the LOVIT trial were randomized to receive 50 mg/kg vitamin C every 6 hours for 96 hours or placebo. Blood samples were collected on study Days 1, 3, and 7 for plasma vitamin C quantification. Population pharmacokinetic modeling was performed, with relevant patient and treatment-related factors tested as covariates. Internal validation was conducted using bootstrap resampling (n = 1000). Univariable and multivariable analyses explored associations between 28-day mortality and patient characteristics, as well as the relationship between vitamin C exposure and severity of illness.

Results: A total of 464 samples from 161 patients who were randomized to vitamin C were analysed. The median age was 64 (interquartile range [IQR] 56-72) years, weight 82 (IQR, 70-94) kg, and APACHE II score 24 (IQR, 18-29); 65.2% were male. A one-compartment model best described the data, with clearance (CL) significantly influenced by CKD-EPI eGFR and APACHE II score. Population mean estimates for clearance and volume of distribution were 3.37 L/h and 45.06 L, respectively. The model was internally validated and demonstrated to be robust and stable. Although greater vitamin C exposure was observed among non-survivors versus survivors (median 1900.5 [IQR 1191.8-2548.2] vs 1017.8 [IQR 630-1836.7] mg·h/L; p < 0.001), only age (odds ratio [OR] 1.063; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.024-1.104, p = 0.001) and APACHE II score (OR 1.079; 95% CI 1.005-1.158, p = 0.036) were independently associated with 28-day mortality. Severity of illness was also predictive of vitamin C exposure.

Conclusions: Vitamin C pharmacokinetics are highly variable between individuals. Some of this variability can be explained by changes in glomerular filtration and APACHE II score as a measure of illness severity. Although non-survivors had greater vitamin C exposure than survivors, exposure was not independently associated with mortality.

成人败血症患者静脉注射维生素C的人群药代动力学:LOVIT试验的一项亚研究
背景和目的:在大型国际LOVIT试验中,大剂量静脉注射维生素C与需要血管加压药物的成人败血症的危害增加有关。LOVIT的人群药代动力学亚研究旨在描述维生素C的药代动力学特征,并探讨其与患者特征和结果的关系。方法:参加LOVIT试验的患者被随机分为每6小时服用50 mg/kg维生素C,持续96小时或安慰剂。在研究的第1、3和7天采集血样进行血浆维生素C的定量测定。进行人群药代动力学建模,以相关患者和治疗相关因素作为协变量进行检验。内部验证采用自举重采样(n = 1000)。单变量和多变量分析探讨了28天死亡率与患者特征之间的关系,以及维生素C暴露与疾病严重程度之间的关系。结果:对161例随机接受维生素C治疗的患者共464份样本进行了分析。年龄中位数为64岁(四分位间距[IQR] 56 ~ 72)岁,体重82 (IQR, 70 ~ 94) kg, APACHEⅱ评分24 (IQR, 18 ~ 29);65.2%为男性。单室模型最好地描述了数据,清除率(CL)受CKD-EPI eGFR和APACHE II评分的显著影响。种群平均估计清除率和分布体积分别为3.37 L/h和45.06 L/h。该模型经过内部验证,证明具有鲁棒性和稳定性。虽然在非幸存者和幸存者中观察到更多的维生素C暴露(中位数为1900.5 [IQR 1191.8-2548.2] vs 1017.8 [IQR 630-1836.7] mg·h/L, p < 0.001),但只有年龄(优势比[OR] 1.063; 95%可信区间[CI] 1.024-1.104, p = 0.001)和APACHE II评分(OR 1.079; 95% CI 1.005-1.158, p = 0.036)与28天死亡率独立相关。疾病的严重程度也预示着维生素C的暴露。结论:维生素C的药代动力学在个体间存在很大差异。这种变异性可以通过肾小球滤过和APACHE II评分的变化来解释,APACHE II评分是衡量疾病严重程度的指标。尽管非幸存者比幸存者有更多的维生素C暴露,但暴露与死亡率并没有独立的联系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.80
自引率
4.40%
发文量
86
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical Pharmacokinetics promotes the continuing development of clinical pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics for the improvement of drug therapy, and for furthering postgraduate education in clinical pharmacology and therapeutics. Pharmacokinetics, the study of drug disposition in the body, is an integral part of drug development and rational use. Knowledge and application of pharmacokinetic principles leads to accelerated drug development, cost effective drug use and a reduced frequency of adverse effects and drug interactions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书