Who is This For? How Felt Accountability Shapes The Enactment of Accountability in Public Service Delivery

IF 7.4 1区 管理学 Q1 POLITICAL SCIENCE
Margit Ernst
{"title":"Who is This For? How Felt Accountability Shapes The Enactment of Accountability in Public Service Delivery","authors":"Margit Ernst","doi":"10.1093/jopart/muag011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"What makes accountability work? To answer this question public administration research has long focused on formal mechanisms–rules, audits, and performance indicators–intended to ensure that public employees answer for their actions. Yet these mechanisms alone rarely determine how accountability plays out in practice. Rather, it depends on how they are recognised, internalised, and enacted by those expected to comply. This realization has spurred growing interest in how employees perceive and enact accountability in the context of public service delivery. Based on ethnographic fieldwork, this study unpacks how street-level bureaucrats navigate tensions between formal accountability demands and their internalised perceptions of accountability. The findings reveal how employees weigh, reinterpret, or reframe accountability based on what they perceive to be at stake. To conceptualize this, the article introduces a concentric model of accountability.","PeriodicalId":48366,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory","volume":"184 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muag011","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

What makes accountability work? To answer this question public administration research has long focused on formal mechanisms–rules, audits, and performance indicators–intended to ensure that public employees answer for their actions. Yet these mechanisms alone rarely determine how accountability plays out in practice. Rather, it depends on how they are recognised, internalised, and enacted by those expected to comply. This realization has spurred growing interest in how employees perceive and enact accountability in the context of public service delivery. Based on ethnographic fieldwork, this study unpacks how street-level bureaucrats navigate tensions between formal accountability demands and their internalised perceptions of accountability. The findings reveal how employees weigh, reinterpret, or reframe accountability based on what they perceive to be at stake. To conceptualize this, the article introduces a concentric model of accountability.
这是给谁的?感觉问责制如何影响公共服务提供问责制的制定
是什么让问责制发挥作用?为了回答这个问题,公共行政研究长期以来一直把重点放在正式机制上——规则、审计和绩效指标——旨在确保公共雇员对自己的行为负责。然而,这些机制本身很少决定问责制在实践中如何发挥作用。相反,这取决于那些被期望遵守的人如何认可、内化和实施这些规则。这种认识激发了人们对员工如何在公共服务提供的背景下感知和制定责任的兴趣。基于民族志的田野调查,本研究揭示了街头官僚如何在正式的问责要求和他们对问责的内在看法之间的紧张关系中进行处理。调查结果揭示了员工如何根据他们认为的利害关系来衡量、重新解释或重新定义责任。为了概念化这一点,本文引入了一个同心问责模型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
11.90%
发文量
46
期刊介绍: The Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory serves as a bridge between public administration or public management scholarship and public policy studies. The Journal aims to provide in-depth analysis of developments in the organizational, administrative, and policy sciences as they apply to government and governance. Each issue brings you critical perspectives and cogent analyses, serving as an outlet for the best theoretical and research work in the field. The Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory is the official journal of the Public Management Research Association.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书