Do Skills Protect from Prejudice? Occupational Status and Ethnic Penalties in British Immigration Preferences

IF 2.9 1区 社会学 Q1 DEMOGRAPHY
Alexandre Afonso
{"title":"Do Skills Protect from Prejudice? Occupational Status and Ethnic Penalties in British Immigration Preferences","authors":"Alexandre Afonso","doi":"10.1177/01979183261442878","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"While extensive research shows that Western publics tend to prefer high-skilled immigrants and those from White-majority nations, the relationship between skill and ethnic penalties in immigration preferences remains poorly understood. This research note seeks to clarify this relationship using a pre-registered survey experiment on a representative sample ( <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">n</jats:italic> = 1216) of (White) British respondents asking them to evaluate South-African visa applicants in two occupations (medical doctors and fast-food employees) whose ethnicity was randomized. Results show evidence of ethnic penalties against non-White applicants when it comes to medical doctors, but not when it comes to fast-food workers. White medical doctors (a high-status occupation) are rated more favorably than Black medical doctors, but White fast-food workers (a low-status occupation) are not rated more favorably than Black fast-food workers. This pattern is particularly pronounced among respondents who display more negative attitudes towards immigration in general. The results are consistent with a mechanism whereby ethnic bias is activated at higher skill levels.","PeriodicalId":48229,"journal":{"name":"International Migration Review","volume":"18 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Migration Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/01979183261442878","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DEMOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

While extensive research shows that Western publics tend to prefer high-skilled immigrants and those from White-majority nations, the relationship between skill and ethnic penalties in immigration preferences remains poorly understood. This research note seeks to clarify this relationship using a pre-registered survey experiment on a representative sample ( n = 1216) of (White) British respondents asking them to evaluate South-African visa applicants in two occupations (medical doctors and fast-food employees) whose ethnicity was randomized. Results show evidence of ethnic penalties against non-White applicants when it comes to medical doctors, but not when it comes to fast-food workers. White medical doctors (a high-status occupation) are rated more favorably than Black medical doctors, but White fast-food workers (a low-status occupation) are not rated more favorably than Black fast-food workers. This pattern is particularly pronounced among respondents who display more negative attitudes towards immigration in general. The results are consistent with a mechanism whereby ethnic bias is activated at higher skill levels.
技能能避免偏见吗?英国移民偏好中的职业地位和种族惩罚
尽管广泛的研究表明,西方公众倾向于青睐高技能移民和那些来自白人占多数的国家的移民,但人们对移民偏好中技能和种族惩罚之间的关系仍然知之甚少。本研究报告试图通过对(白人)英国受访者的代表性样本(n = 1216)进行预先注册的调查实验来澄清这种关系,要求他们评估两种职业(医生和快餐员工)的南非签证申请人,其种族是随机的。研究结果显示,在医生这一职业中,非白人求职者会受到种族歧视,但在快餐行业则不然。白人医生(地位较高的职业)比黑人医生更受欢迎,但白人快餐工人(地位较低的职业)并不比黑人快餐工人更受欢迎。这种模式在总体上对移民表现出更消极态度的受访者中尤为明显。结果与种族偏见在较高技能水平上被激活的机制是一致的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
7.90%
发文量
69
期刊介绍: International Migration Review is an interdisciplinary peer-reviewed journal created to encourage and facilitate the study of all aspects of sociodemographic, historical, economic, political, legislative and international migration. It is internationally regarded as the principal journal in the field facilitating study of international migration, ethnic group relations, and refugee movements. Through an interdisciplinary approach and from an international perspective, IMR provides the single most comprehensive forum devoted exclusively to the analysis and review of international population movements.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书