Using Airborne Laser Scanning and Sentinel‐2 to Understand Subcanopy Light Regimes and Understory Diversity of Vascular Plants in Temperate Mountain Forests
Felix Wieland‐Glasmann, Cornelius Senf, Kristin H. Braziunas, Rupert Seidl, Peter Annighöfer
{"title":"Using Airborne Laser Scanning and Sentinel‐2 to Understand Subcanopy Light Regimes and Understory Diversity of Vascular Plants in Temperate Mountain Forests","authors":"Felix Wieland‐Glasmann, Cornelius Senf, Kristin H. Braziunas, Rupert Seidl, Peter Annighöfer","doi":"10.1002/rse2.70086","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Canopy cover modulates the subcanopy light regime in forests—variations in canopy cover alter both, the amount and spatial distribution of light, representing the source of energy for plants. Because plant species differ regarding their adaptations to light, canopy‐driven light regimes play a key role in structuring understory composition and diversity. Here, we evaluated if Airborne Laser Scanning (ALS) and Sentinel‐2 can map subcanopy light regimes across three study sites ( <jats:italic>n</jats:italic> = 244 plot locations) along the German Alps. We then examined how understory vascular plant species richness varies with subcanopy light regimes. We found light availability increases linearly (Adj. <jats:italic>R</jats:italic> <jats:sup>2</jats:sup> 0.84/RMSE 0.09) with ALS‐derived gap proportion (i.e., inverse of canopy cover), whereas light variability (Adj. <jats:italic>R</jats:italic> <jats:sup>2</jats:sup> 0.46/RMSE 0.05) follows a hump‐shaped pattern. The relationship between the subcanopy light regime and vascular plant species richness in the understory (Adj. <jats:italic>R</jats:italic> <jats:sup>2</jats:sup> 0.39/RMSE 12.77), was equally well described by ALS‐derived gap proportion (Adj. <jats:italic>R</jats:italic> <jats:sup>2</jats:sup> 0.40/RMSE 12.70). Canopy cover described by NDWI from Sentinel‐2 showed similar relationships and could be used to characterize light availability (Adj. <jats:italic>R</jats:italic> <jats:sup>2</jats:sup> 0.43/RMSE 0.18), light variability (Adj. <jats:italic>R</jats:italic> <jats:sup>2</jats:sup> 0.21/RMSE 0.06), and understory vascular plant species richness (Adj. <jats:italic>R</jats:italic> <jats:sup>2</jats:sup> 0.31/RMSE 13.70), albeit with lower variance explained. Understory vascular plant species richness increased with higher light availability and variability, indicating that canopy cover heterogeneity is an important driver of biodiversity next to overall canopy cover. Using spaceborne sensor systems might enable repeatable, large‐scale mapping of canopy cover and thus also understory diversity, as our results suggest such sensors provide similar insights as gold‐standard ALS data, which remain scarce. Understanding the links between canopy cover, the subcanopy light regime, and understory diversity is therefore essential for predicting vegetation dynamics and supporting biodiversity‐oriented forest management.","PeriodicalId":21132,"journal":{"name":"Remote Sensing in Ecology and Conservation","volume":"17 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Remote Sensing in Ecology and Conservation","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/rse2.70086","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Canopy cover modulates the subcanopy light regime in forests—variations in canopy cover alter both, the amount and spatial distribution of light, representing the source of energy for plants. Because plant species differ regarding their adaptations to light, canopy‐driven light regimes play a key role in structuring understory composition and diversity. Here, we evaluated if Airborne Laser Scanning (ALS) and Sentinel‐2 can map subcanopy light regimes across three study sites ( n = 244 plot locations) along the German Alps. We then examined how understory vascular plant species richness varies with subcanopy light regimes. We found light availability increases linearly (Adj. R2 0.84/RMSE 0.09) with ALS‐derived gap proportion (i.e., inverse of canopy cover), whereas light variability (Adj. R2 0.46/RMSE 0.05) follows a hump‐shaped pattern. The relationship between the subcanopy light regime and vascular plant species richness in the understory (Adj. R2 0.39/RMSE 12.77), was equally well described by ALS‐derived gap proportion (Adj. R2 0.40/RMSE 12.70). Canopy cover described by NDWI from Sentinel‐2 showed similar relationships and could be used to characterize light availability (Adj. R2 0.43/RMSE 0.18), light variability (Adj. R2 0.21/RMSE 0.06), and understory vascular plant species richness (Adj. R2 0.31/RMSE 13.70), albeit with lower variance explained. Understory vascular plant species richness increased with higher light availability and variability, indicating that canopy cover heterogeneity is an important driver of biodiversity next to overall canopy cover. Using spaceborne sensor systems might enable repeatable, large‐scale mapping of canopy cover and thus also understory diversity, as our results suggest such sensors provide similar insights as gold‐standard ALS data, which remain scarce. Understanding the links between canopy cover, the subcanopy light regime, and understory diversity is therefore essential for predicting vegetation dynamics and supporting biodiversity‐oriented forest management.
期刊介绍:
emote Sensing in Ecology and Conservation provides a forum for rapid, peer-reviewed publication of novel, multidisciplinary research at the interface between remote sensing science and ecology and conservation. The journal prioritizes findings that advance the scientific basis of ecology and conservation, promoting the development of remote-sensing based methods relevant to the management of land use and biological systems at all levels, from populations and species to ecosystems and biomes. The journal defines remote sensing in its broadest sense, including data acquisition by hand-held and fixed ground-based sensors, such as camera traps and acoustic recorders, and sensors on airplanes and satellites. The intended journal’s audience includes ecologists, conservation scientists, policy makers, managers of terrestrial and aquatic systems, remote sensing scientists, and students.
Remote Sensing in Ecology and Conservation is a fully open access journal from Wiley and the Zoological Society of London. Remote sensing has enormous potential as to provide information on the state of, and pressures on, biological diversity and ecosystem services, at multiple spatial and temporal scales. This new publication provides a forum for multidisciplinary research in remote sensing science, ecological research and conservation science.