Dennis Delali Kwesi Wayo, Sonny Irawan, Mohd Zulkifli Bin Mohamad Noor, Mudasar Zafar, Shynar Juziyeva, Camila Martins Saporetti, Leonardo Goliatt, Randy Hazlett
{"title":"Nordgren PINNs to VQE: Advancing Hydraulic Fracturing Simulations in Shale Reservoirs","authors":"Dennis Delali Kwesi Wayo, Sonny Irawan, Mohd Zulkifli Bin Mohamad Noor, Mudasar Zafar, Shynar Juziyeva, Camila Martins Saporetti, Leonardo Goliatt, Randy Hazlett","doi":"10.1002/nag.70359","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study advances hydraulic fracturing simulations in shale reservoirs using two computational paradigms, Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINNs) and the Variational Quantum Eigensolver (VQE). PINNs were employed to solve Nordgren's equation, which governs fracture width evolution, by embedding physical laws into the neural network architecture. Using TensorFlow on Google Colab, the PINN training process incorporated Adam, L-BFGS, and Newton-CG optimizers, reaching a final loss of <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <mn>1.23</mn>\n <mo>×</mo>\n <msup>\n <mn>10</mn>\n <mrow>\n <mo>−</mo>\n <mn>9</mn>\n </mrow>\n </msup>\n </mrow>\n <annotation>$1.23\\times 10^{-9}$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> for a representative benchmark case (e.g., fluid viscosity <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mi>μ</mi>\n <annotation>$\\mu$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> = 8.0 <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <mi>Pa</mi>\n <mo>·</mo>\n <mi>s</mi>\n </mrow>\n <annotation>$\\rm{Pa}\\cdot\\rm{s}$</annotation>\n </semantics></math>, fracture height <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mi>H</mi>\n <annotation>$H$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> = 2.0 m, and leak-off coefficient <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <msub>\n <mi>C</mi>\n <mi>L</mi>\n </msub>\n <annotation>$C_L$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> = 1.0); these parameters are used for comparison and are not tied to a specific field dataset. However, this approach demands computational resources, with training times exceeding 1454 s and memory usage of 1136 MB. Conversely, the VQE framework leveraged Qiskit on Qbraid to optimize the Hamiltonian representing the fracture system in practice. With qubit-based ansatz circuits and classical optimizers (SPSA, COBYLA, and L-BFGS), VQE achieves energy minimization, converging to -0.583+0j in under 2 s with low memory requirements. Spatiotemporal fracture width predictions from VQE align with trends but exhibit slight oscillations due to quantum noise. This comparative study highlights a trade-off: PINNs show stronger physics-consistent accuracy in the tested cases, while VQE provides lower runtime and memory use. These results suggest that combining PINN accuracy with VQE speed may be useful for decision-support workflows in hydraulic fracturing. Future research will explore integrating these paradigms for scalable, high-fidelity simulations across complex geological settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":13786,"journal":{"name":"International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics","volume":"50 12","pages":"4863-4878"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/nag.70359","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/nag.70359","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/6/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This study advances hydraulic fracturing simulations in shale reservoirs using two computational paradigms, Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINNs) and the Variational Quantum Eigensolver (VQE). PINNs were employed to solve Nordgren's equation, which governs fracture width evolution, by embedding physical laws into the neural network architecture. Using TensorFlow on Google Colab, the PINN training process incorporated Adam, L-BFGS, and Newton-CG optimizers, reaching a final loss of for a representative benchmark case (e.g., fluid viscosity = 8.0 , fracture height = 2.0 m, and leak-off coefficient = 1.0); these parameters are used for comparison and are not tied to a specific field dataset. However, this approach demands computational resources, with training times exceeding 1454 s and memory usage of 1136 MB. Conversely, the VQE framework leveraged Qiskit on Qbraid to optimize the Hamiltonian representing the fracture system in practice. With qubit-based ansatz circuits and classical optimizers (SPSA, COBYLA, and L-BFGS), VQE achieves energy minimization, converging to -0.583+0j in under 2 s with low memory requirements. Spatiotemporal fracture width predictions from VQE align with trends but exhibit slight oscillations due to quantum noise. This comparative study highlights a trade-off: PINNs show stronger physics-consistent accuracy in the tested cases, while VQE provides lower runtime and memory use. These results suggest that combining PINN accuracy with VQE speed may be useful for decision-support workflows in hydraulic fracturing. Future research will explore integrating these paradigms for scalable, high-fidelity simulations across complex geological settings.
期刊介绍:
The journal welcomes manuscripts that substantially contribute to the understanding of the complex mechanical behaviour of geomaterials (soils, rocks, concrete, ice, snow, and powders), through innovative experimental techniques, and/or through the development of novel numerical or hybrid experimental/numerical modelling concepts in geomechanics. Topics of interest include instabilities and localization, interface and surface phenomena, fracture and failure, multi-physics and other time-dependent phenomena, micromechanics and multi-scale methods, and inverse analysis and stochastic methods. Papers related to energy and environmental issues are particularly welcome. The illustration of the proposed methods and techniques to engineering problems is encouraged. However, manuscripts dealing with applications of existing methods, or proposing incremental improvements to existing methods – in particular marginal extensions of existing analytical solutions or numerical methods – will not be considered for review.