2063-P: Implementation of HbA1c Point-of-Care Testing in Primary Care Settings

IF 9.3 1区 医学 Q1 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Diabetes Pub Date : 2026-06-11 DOI:10.2337/db26-2063-p
RASHA KHATIB, JOHN BRILL, MARTA CLENDENIN, KENNETH KUPFER, QUAN ZOU, NICOLE GLOWACKI, RAMONA DONOVAN, KYLE FORTNER, NASEER AHMED
{"title":"2063-P: Implementation of HbA1c Point-of-Care Testing in Primary Care Settings","authors":"RASHA KHATIB, JOHN BRILL, MARTA CLENDENIN, KENNETH KUPFER, QUAN ZOU, NICOLE GLOWACKI, RAMONA DONOVAN, KYLE FORTNER, NASEER AHMED","doi":"10.2337/db26-2063-p","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction and Objective: Point-of-care testing (POCT) for hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) can improve testing frequency and glycemic control. This study evaluated test frequency, change in HbA1c, and diabetes therapy changes among patients with poorly controlled diabetes after introducing HbA1c POCT in primary care settings. Methods: HbA1c POCT was introduced at 6 primary care clinics. Patients with Type 2 diabetes with ≥1 HbA1c test value ≥8.0% within 13 months and no medical conditions affecting red blood cell turnover were eligible for POCT testing during routine clinic visits. The Test Cohort consisted of patients with ≥1 POCT test during the study period. The Control Cohort was selected from sites not participating in the study using propensity score matching to the Test Cohort. Outcomes were compared 13 months pre- and post-implementation of POCT and to the Control Cohort. Logistic regression was used to evaluate the association between test frequency and HbA1c reduction. The time from HbA1c tests to changes in diabetes therapy was calculated. Results: The Test Cohort consisted of N=943 subjects and N=3,003 in the Control Cohort. The number of HbA1c tests per subject in the Test Cohort increased from 2.38 to 2.65 post-implementation of POCT (p=0.002), vs. no change in the Control Cohort (2.11 and 2.16 respectively). There was no significant difference in mean HbA1c reduction between the two Cohorts. In both cohorts, more frequent testing was associated with clinically significant HbA1c reduction (≥0.4%). HbA1c tests >120 days apart were associated with increased HbA1c in both cohorts. In the Test Cohort, 34.8% of intervals between HbA1c tests were >120 days vs. 47.9% in the Control Cohort (p<0.0001). The median time to therapy change was within 1 day of POCT, vs. 7 days for a laboratory HbA1c test. Use of POCT was associated with a higher rate of therapy changes (hazard ratio=1.71, 95% confidence interval=1.53, 1.91). Conclusion: POCT improves HbA1c testing frequency and diabetes therapy changes in primary care settings. More frequent HbA1c testing is associated with lower HbA1c levels. Disclosure R. Khatib: None. J. Brill: None. M. Clendenin: Employee; Current; Abbott. K. Kupfer: Employee; Current; Abbott. Q. Zou: Employee; Current; Abbott Diagnostics. N. Glowacki: None. R. Donovan: None. K. Fortner: Employee; Current; Abbott Diagnostics. N. Ahmed: Employee; Ended; Abbott Diagnostics. Employee; Current; Janssen Research & Development, LLC.","PeriodicalId":11376,"journal":{"name":"Diabetes","volume":"9 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diabetes","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2337/db26-2063-p","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction and Objective: Point-of-care testing (POCT) for hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) can improve testing frequency and glycemic control. This study evaluated test frequency, change in HbA1c, and diabetes therapy changes among patients with poorly controlled diabetes after introducing HbA1c POCT in primary care settings. Methods: HbA1c POCT was introduced at 6 primary care clinics. Patients with Type 2 diabetes with ≥1 HbA1c test value ≥8.0% within 13 months and no medical conditions affecting red blood cell turnover were eligible for POCT testing during routine clinic visits. The Test Cohort consisted of patients with ≥1 POCT test during the study period. The Control Cohort was selected from sites not participating in the study using propensity score matching to the Test Cohort. Outcomes were compared 13 months pre- and post-implementation of POCT and to the Control Cohort. Logistic regression was used to evaluate the association between test frequency and HbA1c reduction. The time from HbA1c tests to changes in diabetes therapy was calculated. Results: The Test Cohort consisted of N=943 subjects and N=3,003 in the Control Cohort. The number of HbA1c tests per subject in the Test Cohort increased from 2.38 to 2.65 post-implementation of POCT (p=0.002), vs. no change in the Control Cohort (2.11 and 2.16 respectively). There was no significant difference in mean HbA1c reduction between the two Cohorts. In both cohorts, more frequent testing was associated with clinically significant HbA1c reduction (≥0.4%). HbA1c tests >120 days apart were associated with increased HbA1c in both cohorts. In the Test Cohort, 34.8% of intervals between HbA1c tests were >120 days vs. 47.9% in the Control Cohort (p<0.0001). The median time to therapy change was within 1 day of POCT, vs. 7 days for a laboratory HbA1c test. Use of POCT was associated with a higher rate of therapy changes (hazard ratio=1.71, 95% confidence interval=1.53, 1.91). Conclusion: POCT improves HbA1c testing frequency and diabetes therapy changes in primary care settings. More frequent HbA1c testing is associated with lower HbA1c levels. Disclosure R. Khatib: None. J. Brill: None. M. Clendenin: Employee; Current; Abbott. K. Kupfer: Employee; Current; Abbott. Q. Zou: Employee; Current; Abbott Diagnostics. N. Glowacki: None. R. Donovan: None. K. Fortner: Employee; Current; Abbott Diagnostics. N. Ahmed: Employee; Ended; Abbott Diagnostics. Employee; Current; Janssen Research & Development, LLC.
2063-P:在初级保健机构实施糖化血红蛋白即时检测
简介与目的:即时检测糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)可提高检测频率,改善血糖控制。本研究评估了在初级保健机构引入HbA1c POCT后,控制不良的糖尿病患者的检测频率、HbA1c变化和糖尿病治疗变化。方法:在6家初级保健诊所引入HbA1c POCT。2型糖尿病患者,13个月内HbA1c≥1≥8.0%,且无影响红细胞周转的疾病,可在常规门诊就诊时进行POCT检测。试验队列由研究期间POCT检测≥1的患者组成。对照队列是从未参与研究的站点中选择的,使用与测试队列匹配的倾向评分。将POCT实施前后13个月的结果与对照队列进行比较。采用Logistic回归评估检测频率与HbA1c降低之间的关系。计算从HbA1c检测到糖尿病治疗改变的时间。结果:测试队列包括N=943名受试者,对照队列包括N= 3003名受试者。在实施POCT后,测试队列中每个受试者的HbA1c检测数量从2.38增加到2.65 (p=0.002),而对照队列中没有变化(分别为2.11和2.16)。两组患者的平均HbA1c降低无显著差异。在这两个队列中,更频繁的检测与临床显著的HbA1c降低相关(≥0.4%)。HbA1c测试&;gt;在两个队列中,间隔120天与HbA1c升高相关。在测试队列中,34.8%的HbA1c测试间隔为&;gt;120天,对照组为47.9% (p<0.0001)。治疗改变的中位时间为POCT后1天内,而实验室HbA1c检测为7天。使用POCT与更高的治疗改变率相关(风险比=1.71,95%可信区间=1.53,1.91)。结论:POCT改善了初级保健机构HbA1c检测频率和糖尿病治疗的改变。更频繁的HbA1c检测与较低的HbA1c水平相关。哈提卜:没有。J.布里尔:没有。克伦德宁:雇员;当前的;阿伯特。K. Kupfer:雇员;当前的;阿伯特。邹问:员工;当前的;雅培诊断。格洛瓦奇:没有。多诺万:没有。K.福特纳:员工;当前的;雅培诊断。N. Ahmed:雇员;结束;雅培诊断。员工;当前的;杨森研究开发有限责任公司
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Diabetes
Diabetes 医学-内分泌学与代谢
CiteScore
12.50
自引率
2.60%
发文量
1968
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Diabetes is a scientific journal that publishes original research exploring the physiological and pathophysiological aspects of diabetes mellitus. We encourage submissions of manuscripts pertaining to laboratory, animal, or human research, covering a wide range of topics. Our primary focus is on investigative reports investigating various aspects such as the development and progression of diabetes, along with its associated complications. We also welcome studies delving into normal and pathological pancreatic islet function and intermediary metabolism, as well as exploring the mechanisms of drug and hormone action from a pharmacological perspective. Additionally, we encourage submissions that delve into the biochemical and molecular aspects of both normal and abnormal biological processes. However, it is important to note that we do not publish studies relating to diabetes education or the application of accepted therapeutic and diagnostic approaches to patients with diabetes mellitus. Our aim is to provide a platform for research that contributes to advancing our understanding of the underlying mechanisms and processes of diabetes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书