Teachers’ professional well-being in Dutch child care and after-school care programs: relations with individual, classroom and organizational characteristics

IF 2.6 1区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Bodine R. Romijn, Pauline L. Slot, Paul. P.M. Leseman
{"title":"Teachers’ professional well-being in Dutch child care and after-school care programs: relations with individual, classroom and organizational characteristics","authors":"Bodine R. Romijn, Pauline L. Slot, Paul. P.M. Leseman","doi":"10.1016/j.ecresq.2026.05.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper investigates determinants of professional well-being (PWB) of teachers working in child care (i.e. day care and after-school care) using the Job Demands and Resources (JD-R) model. Based on nationally representative data from 841 teachers and 494 leaders working in 559 Dutch child care centers, we tested a comprehensive set of possible predictors of PWB at the individual teacher (e.g., work experience), classroom (e.g., classroom composition) and organizational level (e.g., team cohesion based on teachers’ and leaders’ views). Following the JD-R model, job demands included working hours, children-to-teacher ratio, age composition in the classroom, and proportion of children with behavioral difficulties or special needs, staff shortage and percentage of permanent staff, and resources concerned team cohesion and continuous professional development. We utilized data of different program types (i.e. full-day child care, half-day child care, and after-school programs) from two nationally representative samples, one collected before COVID-19 and one collected after. Our results indicated that job demands and resources were related differently to various professional well-being measures and that associations differed by program type, emphasizing the importance of adopting a comprehensive approach to understand teachers’ PWB. Altogether, only a few job demands (e.g., children-to-teacher ratio) were related to PWB in some program types, but the most consistent and strongest finding concerned the positive association of team cohesion, suggesting a buffering effect. Also, teachers’ PWB decreased after COVID-19. In conclusion, our study highlights that a joint focus on strengthening job resources within the organization fulfills a pivotal role in creating and maintaining a sustainable and high-quality workforce.","PeriodicalId":48348,"journal":{"name":"Early Childhood Research Quarterly","volume":"17 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Early Childhood Research Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2026.05.005","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper investigates determinants of professional well-being (PWB) of teachers working in child care (i.e. day care and after-school care) using the Job Demands and Resources (JD-R) model. Based on nationally representative data from 841 teachers and 494 leaders working in 559 Dutch child care centers, we tested a comprehensive set of possible predictors of PWB at the individual teacher (e.g., work experience), classroom (e.g., classroom composition) and organizational level (e.g., team cohesion based on teachers’ and leaders’ views). Following the JD-R model, job demands included working hours, children-to-teacher ratio, age composition in the classroom, and proportion of children with behavioral difficulties or special needs, staff shortage and percentage of permanent staff, and resources concerned team cohesion and continuous professional development. We utilized data of different program types (i.e. full-day child care, half-day child care, and after-school programs) from two nationally representative samples, one collected before COVID-19 and one collected after. Our results indicated that job demands and resources were related differently to various professional well-being measures and that associations differed by program type, emphasizing the importance of adopting a comprehensive approach to understand teachers’ PWB. Altogether, only a few job demands (e.g., children-to-teacher ratio) were related to PWB in some program types, but the most consistent and strongest finding concerned the positive association of team cohesion, suggesting a buffering effect. Also, teachers’ PWB decreased after COVID-19. In conclusion, our study highlights that a joint focus on strengthening job resources within the organization fulfills a pivotal role in creating and maintaining a sustainable and high-quality workforce.
荷兰儿童保育和课后护理项目中教师的职业幸福感:与个体、课堂和组织特征的关系
本文采用工作需求与资源(JD-R)模型,对从事儿童保育(即日托和课后护理)工作的教师的职业幸福感(PWB)的决定因素进行了研究。基于来自荷兰559个儿童护理中心的841名教师和494名领导者的全国代表性数据,我们在教师个人(如工作经验)、课堂(如课堂构成)和组织层面(如基于教师和领导者观点的团队凝聚力)测试了一套全面的PWB可能预测因素。根据JD-R模型,工作需求包括工作时间、儿童与教师的比例、课堂年龄构成、有行为困难或特殊需要儿童的比例、员工短缺和长期员工比例、团队凝聚力和持续专业发展资源。我们使用了来自两个全国代表性样本的不同项目类型(即全天托儿、半天托儿和课后项目)的数据,其中一个在COVID-19之前收集,另一个在COVID-19之后收集。我们的研究结果表明,工作需求和资源与各种专业幸福感指标的相关性不同,而不同项目类型的相关性也不同,这强调了采用综合方法了解教师PWB的重要性。总的来说,在某些项目类型中,只有少数工作需求(例如,儿童与教师的比例)与PWB相关,但最一致和最强烈的发现是与团队凝聚力的正相关,表明存在缓冲效应。此外,教师的PWB在新冠肺炎后有所下降。总之,我们的研究强调,在组织内部共同关注加强工作资源,在创造和维持可持续的高质量劳动力方面发挥着关键作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
8.10%
发文量
109
期刊介绍: For over twenty years, Early Childhood Research Quarterly (ECRQ) has influenced the field of early childhood education and development through the publication of empirical research that meets the highest standards of scholarly and practical significance. ECRQ publishes predominantly empirical research (quantitative or qualitative methods) on issues of interest to early childhood development, theory, and educational practice (Birth through 8 years of age). The journal also occasionally publishes practitioner and/or policy perspectives, book reviews, and significant reviews of research. As an applied journal, we are interested in work that has social, policy, and educational relevance and implications and work that strengthens links between research and practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书