Conditional Toleration and Social Peace in Seventeenth-Century Holland Rethinking a Historical Model of Immigration and Diversity

IF 2.9 1区 社会学 Q1 DEMOGRAPHY
Steije Hofhuis
{"title":"Conditional Toleration and Social Peace in Seventeenth-Century Holland Rethinking a Historical Model of Immigration and Diversity","authors":"Steije Hofhuis","doi":"10.1177/01979183261449489","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article examines whether seventeenth-century Dutch cities, which experienced large waves of immigration, are adequately referenced in modern discussions about immigration and diversity. In Dutch and international narratives, these cities are often portrayed as open, tolerant, and multicultural, thriving due to inclusive policies toward newcomers. They are thus presented as historical examples supporting openness today. Using specialized research on religious toleration and urban governance, this article reevaluates that view. It argues that peaceful coexistence between natives and newcomers depended not only on openness but also on regulation and institutional inequalities. Immigrants faced restrictions on welfare access, political participation, and civic recognition, while religious minorities were tolerated only under conditions of internal discipline and economic self-sufficiency. Social stability was maintained by protecting established residents from the perceived downsides of immigration. Seventeenth-century Dutch cities thus exemplify conditional toleration rather than open multiculturalism, complicating modern comparisons and indicating how institutional constraints shaped relatively peaceful immigration societies.","PeriodicalId":48229,"journal":{"name":"International Migration Review","volume":"4 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Migration Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/01979183261449489","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DEMOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article examines whether seventeenth-century Dutch cities, which experienced large waves of immigration, are adequately referenced in modern discussions about immigration and diversity. In Dutch and international narratives, these cities are often portrayed as open, tolerant, and multicultural, thriving due to inclusive policies toward newcomers. They are thus presented as historical examples supporting openness today. Using specialized research on religious toleration and urban governance, this article reevaluates that view. It argues that peaceful coexistence between natives and newcomers depended not only on openness but also on regulation and institutional inequalities. Immigrants faced restrictions on welfare access, political participation, and civic recognition, while religious minorities were tolerated only under conditions of internal discipline and economic self-sufficiency. Social stability was maintained by protecting established residents from the perceived downsides of immigration. Seventeenth-century Dutch cities thus exemplify conditional toleration rather than open multiculturalism, complicating modern comparisons and indicating how institutional constraints shaped relatively peaceful immigration societies.
17世纪荷兰的条件宽容与社会和平——对移民与多样性历史模式的再思考
这篇文章考察了17世纪的荷兰城市,经历了大规模的移民浪潮,是否在现代关于移民和多样性的讨论中得到了充分的参考。在荷兰和国际叙事中,这些城市经常被描绘成开放、宽容和多元文化的城市,由于对新来者的包容政策而蓬勃发展。因此,它们被视为支持今天开放的历史例子。通过对宗教宽容和城市治理的专门研究,本文重新评估了这一观点。它认为,本地人和新来者之间的和平共处不仅取决于开放,还取决于监管和制度上的不平等。移民在获得福利、政治参与和公民认可方面受到限制,而宗教少数群体只有在内部纪律和经济自给自足的条件下才能得到容忍。社会稳定是通过保护现有居民免受移民带来的负面影响来维持的。因此,17世纪的荷兰城市体现了有条件的宽容,而不是开放的多元文化主义,这使现代比较变得复杂,并表明制度约束如何塑造了相对和平的移民社会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
7.90%
发文量
69
期刊介绍: International Migration Review is an interdisciplinary peer-reviewed journal created to encourage and facilitate the study of all aspects of sociodemographic, historical, economic, political, legislative and international migration. It is internationally regarded as the principal journal in the field facilitating study of international migration, ethnic group relations, and refugee movements. Through an interdisciplinary approach and from an international perspective, IMR provides the single most comprehensive forum devoted exclusively to the analysis and review of international population movements.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书