Coastal Farmers' and Agricultural Landowners' Perceptions of Marsh Migration and Emerging Socio‐Ecological Vulnerabilities Related to Sea‐Level Rise

IF 2.4 3区 社会学 Q2 SOCIOLOGY
RURAL SOCIOLOGY Pub Date : 2026-05-08 DOI:10.1111/ruso.70049
Margaret D. Smith, Ashley A. Dayer, Justin M. Beall, Elizabeth A. Hunter
{"title":"Coastal Farmers' and Agricultural Landowners' Perceptions of Marsh Migration and Emerging Socio‐Ecological Vulnerabilities Related to Sea‐Level Rise","authors":"Margaret D. Smith, Ashley A. Dayer, Justin M. Beall, Elizabeth A. Hunter","doi":"10.1111/ruso.70049","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Sea‐level rise (SLR) has the potential to profoundly impact coastal ecosystems and human communities. SLR will cause marshes to erode on their seaward edge, but marsh migration onto uplands may allow for their persistence and continued provision of ecosystem services. Low elevation agricultural land may be well‐suited for marsh migration; however, SLR and associated marsh migration on agricultural land could negatively impact farmers and landowners, underscoring the value of exploring both social and ecological dimensions of marsh migration. We conducted semi‐structured interviews ( <jats:italic>n</jats:italic> = 12) with coastal farmers and agricultural landowners on the Eastern Shore of Virginia, USA to understand their experiences with and perceptions of impacts of marsh migration on their agricultural lands and in their community. While interviewees acknowledged some benefits of marsh migration, the preservation of farmland was preferred over allowing marsh migration. Participants also shared their views on some of the social consequences of SLR and marsh migration such as impacts to their livelihoods, damage to infrastructure in their communities, and the impact of regulatory boundaries related to wetlands. However, most saw these as distant issues. We outline additional socio‐cultural factors interviewees noted, such as intergenerational ties to the community and desires to see open space conserved, that could influence efforts to promote marsh migration. In revealing current challenges and opportunities facing coastal farmers and agricultural landowners due to SLR, these findings can inform coastal adaptation planning efforts that simultaneously consider ecological and social impacts of marsh migration.","PeriodicalId":47924,"journal":{"name":"RURAL SOCIOLOGY","volume":"70 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"RURAL SOCIOLOGY","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ruso.70049","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Sea‐level rise (SLR) has the potential to profoundly impact coastal ecosystems and human communities. SLR will cause marshes to erode on their seaward edge, but marsh migration onto uplands may allow for their persistence and continued provision of ecosystem services. Low elevation agricultural land may be well‐suited for marsh migration; however, SLR and associated marsh migration on agricultural land could negatively impact farmers and landowners, underscoring the value of exploring both social and ecological dimensions of marsh migration. We conducted semi‐structured interviews ( n = 12) with coastal farmers and agricultural landowners on the Eastern Shore of Virginia, USA to understand their experiences with and perceptions of impacts of marsh migration on their agricultural lands and in their community. While interviewees acknowledged some benefits of marsh migration, the preservation of farmland was preferred over allowing marsh migration. Participants also shared their views on some of the social consequences of SLR and marsh migration such as impacts to their livelihoods, damage to infrastructure in their communities, and the impact of regulatory boundaries related to wetlands. However, most saw these as distant issues. We outline additional socio‐cultural factors interviewees noted, such as intergenerational ties to the community and desires to see open space conserved, that could influence efforts to promote marsh migration. In revealing current challenges and opportunities facing coastal farmers and agricultural landowners due to SLR, these findings can inform coastal adaptation planning efforts that simultaneously consider ecological and social impacts of marsh migration.
沿海农民和农业土地所有者对与海平面上升相关的沼泽迁移和新兴社会生态脆弱性的看法
海平面上升有可能对沿海生态系统和人类社区产生深远影响。单反将导致沼泽向海边缘的侵蚀,但沼泽向高地的迁移可能会使它们持续存在并继续提供生态系统服务。低海拔农业用地可能非常适合沼泽迁移;然而,SLR和相关的农业用地沼泽迁移可能对农民和土地所有者产生负面影响,强调了探索沼泽迁移的社会和生态维度的价值。我们对美国弗吉尼亚州东岸的沿海农民和农业土地所有者进行了半结构化访谈(n = 12),以了解他们对沼泽迁移对其农业土地和社区的影响的经历和看法。虽然受访者承认沼泽迁移的一些好处,但保护农田比允许沼泽迁移更受欢迎。与会者还分享了他们对SLR和沼泽迁移的一些社会后果的看法,例如对他们生计的影响,对社区基础设施的破坏,以及与湿地有关的监管边界的影响。然而,大多数人认为这些是遥远的问题。我们概述了受访者注意到的其他社会文化因素,例如与社区的代际关系以及对保护开放空间的渴望,这些因素可能会影响促进沼泽迁移的努力。这些发现揭示了目前沿海农民和农业土地所有者因SLR而面临的挑战和机遇,可以为同时考虑沼泽迁移的生态和社会影响的沿海适应规划工作提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
RURAL SOCIOLOGY
RURAL SOCIOLOGY SOCIOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
13.00%
发文量
47
期刊介绍: A forum for cutting-edge research, Rural Sociology explores sociological and interdisciplinary approaches to emerging social issues and new approaches to recurring social issues affecting rural people and places. The journal is particularly interested in advancing sociological theory and welcomes the use of a wide range of social science methodologies. Manuscripts that use a sociological perspective to address the effects of local and global systems on rural people and places, rural community revitalization, rural demographic changes, rural poverty, natural resource allocations, the environment, food and agricultural systems, and related topics from all regions of the world are welcome. Rural Sociology also accepts papers that significantly advance the measurement of key sociological concepts or provide well-documented critical analysis of one or more theories as these measures and analyses are related to rural sociology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书