{"title":"Developing a Structural Understanding of School Social Work","authors":"Brandon Mitchell, Kimberly Knox","doi":"10.1007/s10560-026-01114-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"School social work is challenged by disparate professional guidance, inconsistent certification standards, and role ambiguity –– all intersecting with schools that are ripe with inequities. Despite this complexity, research has often gravitated toward a disproportionate analysis of roles. Although an understanding of roles is imperative, this focus, at times, has supplanted an awareness of the structural dimensions that affect practice that exist <jats:italic>in</jats:italic> and <jats:italic>outside</jats:italic> of the school. The purpose of this article is to outline a structural understanding of school social work through attention to national leadership, state training, and school-based factors that affect roles and practice. The analysis spans three levels, (1) <jats:italic>national</jats:italic> , (2) <jats:italic>state,</jats:italic> and (3) <jats:italic>school.</jats:italic> On the national level, we explore professional guidance from leadership organizations to identify the potential influence on training and practice. On the state level, we explore state certification standards and inconsistent educational preparation to consider the bidirectional links between professional guidance and role efficacy in schools. On the school level, we examine the relationship between educational inequities and school social work, including inconsistent roles, practice ambiguity, and the barriers to effective practice. We conclude with recommendations for research and practice.","PeriodicalId":51512,"journal":{"name":"Child and Adolescent Social Work Journal","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Child and Adolescent Social Work Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10560-026-01114-5","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIAL WORK","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
School social work is challenged by disparate professional guidance, inconsistent certification standards, and role ambiguity –– all intersecting with schools that are ripe with inequities. Despite this complexity, research has often gravitated toward a disproportionate analysis of roles. Although an understanding of roles is imperative, this focus, at times, has supplanted an awareness of the structural dimensions that affect practice that exist in and outside of the school. The purpose of this article is to outline a structural understanding of school social work through attention to national leadership, state training, and school-based factors that affect roles and practice. The analysis spans three levels, (1) national , (2) state, and (3) school. On the national level, we explore professional guidance from leadership organizations to identify the potential influence on training and practice. On the state level, we explore state certification standards and inconsistent educational preparation to consider the bidirectional links between professional guidance and role efficacy in schools. On the school level, we examine the relationship between educational inequities and school social work, including inconsistent roles, practice ambiguity, and the barriers to effective practice. We conclude with recommendations for research and practice.
期刊介绍:
The Child and Adolescent Social Work Journal (CASW) features original articles that focus on social work practice with children, adolescents, and their families. Topics include issues affecting a variety of specific populations in special settings. CASW welcomes a range of scholarly contributions focused on children and adolescents, including theoretical papers, narrative case studies, historical analyses, traditional reviews of the literature, descriptive studies, single-system research designs, correlational investigations, methodological works, pre-experimental, quasi-experimental and experimental evaluations, meta-analyses and systematic reviews. Manuscripts involving qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods are welcome to be submitted, as are papers grounded in one or more theoretical orientations, or those that are not based on any formal theory. CASW values different disciplines and interdisciplinary work that informs social work practice and policy. Authors from public health, nursing, psychology, sociology, and other disciplines are encouraged to submit manuscripts. All manuscripts should include specific implications for social work policy and practice with children and adolescents. Appropriate fields of practice include interpersonal practice, small groups, families, organizations, communities, policy practice, nationally-oriented work, and international studies. Authors considering publication in CASW should review the following editorial: Schelbe, L., & Thyer, B. A. (2019). Child and Adolescent Social Work Journal Editorial Policy: Guidelines for Authors. Child and Adolescent Social Work Journal, 36, 75-80.