River Rights and the Territorial Autonomy of Indigenous and Ethnic Communities in Ecuador and Colombia: Within and Beyond the Courtroom

IF 3.4 1区 社会学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Elizabeth Macpherson, Julia Guadalupe Torres Ventura
{"title":"River Rights and the Territorial Autonomy of Indigenous and Ethnic Communities in Ecuador and Colombia: Within and Beyond the Courtroom","authors":"Elizabeth Macpherson, Julia Guadalupe Torres Ventura","doi":"10.1017/s204710252510023x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Across multiple jurisdictions, Indigenous and ethnic communities have sought recognition and protection of the legal rights of rivers as part of broader activist agendas seeking greater legal and political control over their lands and resources. Yet the legal scholarship tracing these cases of ‘river rights’ has often ignored the role of activism in driving and shaping river rights frameworks, as well as the broader implications of these frameworks for community activist agendas. In this article, we examine two legal cases in which Indigenous and Afrodescendent peoples have used legal and extralegal strategies to secure protection for the rights of rivers: for the Piatúa River in Ecuador and the Atrato River in Colombia. In both cases, we find that communities are strategically leveraging river rights frameworks, alongside constitutional and human rights protections, to assert and enhance their territorial autonomy. While the project of recuperating territorial autonomy is incomplete in both cases, our comparative analysis confirms that these cases should be seen as incremental steps in a broader project of transforming community relationships with government institutions, local authorities, and the courts, enabling more pluralist territorial governance to emerge over time.","PeriodicalId":45716,"journal":{"name":"Transnational Environmental Law","volume":"10 1","pages":"1-30"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transnational Environmental Law","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s204710252510023x","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Across multiple jurisdictions, Indigenous and ethnic communities have sought recognition and protection of the legal rights of rivers as part of broader activist agendas seeking greater legal and political control over their lands and resources. Yet the legal scholarship tracing these cases of ‘river rights’ has often ignored the role of activism in driving and shaping river rights frameworks, as well as the broader implications of these frameworks for community activist agendas. In this article, we examine two legal cases in which Indigenous and Afrodescendent peoples have used legal and extralegal strategies to secure protection for the rights of rivers: for the Piatúa River in Ecuador and the Atrato River in Colombia. In both cases, we find that communities are strategically leveraging river rights frameworks, alongside constitutional and human rights protections, to assert and enhance their territorial autonomy. While the project of recuperating territorial autonomy is incomplete in both cases, our comparative analysis confirms that these cases should be seen as incremental steps in a broader project of transforming community relationships with government institutions, local authorities, and the courts, enabling more pluralist territorial governance to emerge over time.
厄瓜多尔和哥伦比亚土著和族裔社区的河流权利和领土自治:法庭内外
在多个司法管辖区,土著和少数民族社区寻求承认和保护河流的合法权利,作为更广泛的活动家议程的一部分,他们寻求对其土地和资源进行更大的法律和政治控制。然而,追踪这些“河流权利”案例的法律学者往往忽视了激进主义在推动和塑造河流权利框架方面的作用,以及这些框架对社区活动家议程的更广泛影响。在本文中,我们研究了两个法律案例,其中土著和非洲裔人民使用法律和法外策略来确保保护河流的权利:厄瓜多尔的Piatúa河和哥伦比亚的Atrato河。在这两种情况下,我们发现社区都在战略性地利用河流权利框架,以及宪法和人权保护,来维护和加强其领土自治权。虽然在这两种情况下恢复领土自治的项目都是不完整的,但我们的比较分析证实,这些案例应被视为一个更广泛的项目中的渐进步骤,该项目旨在改变社区与政府机构、地方当局和法院的关系,使更多的多元领土治理随着时间的推移而出现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
16.30%
发文量
29
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书