Interprofessional Perspectives on Communication Quality in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit: A Qualitative Study.

IF 1.6
Katherine Guttmann, Elizabeth Mari, Christine A Fortney, Andrea Weintraub
{"title":"Interprofessional Perspectives on Communication Quality in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit: A Qualitative Study.","authors":"Katherine Guttmann, Elizabeth Mari, Christine A Fortney, Andrea Weintraub","doi":"10.1097/ANC.0000000000001389","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Communication with parents in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) setting is both important and uniquely challenging. Prior research has established that communication quality directly effects patient and parent outcomes in the NICU. A range of provider types comprise the interprofessional NICU team, each bringing a unique perspective. Yet, there is limited literature reflecting these diverse points of view. Although NICU staff often endorse the sentiment that high-quality communication is essential for excellent patient care, it is not clear that providers in different roles define \"high-quality communication\" in the same way.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To explore interprofessional perspectives of NICU personnel on communication quality.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>One-question semi-structured interviews were conducted with NICU staff. Thematic analysis was used to explore and compare themes across disciplines.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixty-two staff members were interviewed. Two thematic categories emerged: messaging and dynamics. Messaging sub-themes included: 1) clarity (setting goals; clear and direct language; avoiding jargon; ensuring parents understand) and 2) timing and approach (unhurried; frequent; timely; proactive). Dynamics sub-themes included: 1) team interactions (inclusivity; respect; consistency) and 2) parent-centeredness (parents as key stakeholders; identifying and adapting to needs; creating a safe space; empathy; offering flexible modes of communication).</p><p><strong>Implications for practice and research: </strong>Although staff members across disciplines have different foci relative to communication quality, excellent communication among teams is essential to ensuring high-quality communication with families. Improving team dynamics, equipping teams with a shared model of communication quality, and ensuring adequate staffing may improve communication.</p>","PeriodicalId":520547,"journal":{"name":"Advances in neonatal care : official journal of the National Association of Neonatal Nurses","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13377401/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in neonatal care : official journal of the National Association of Neonatal Nurses","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ANC.0000000000001389","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Communication with parents in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) setting is both important and uniquely challenging. Prior research has established that communication quality directly effects patient and parent outcomes in the NICU. A range of provider types comprise the interprofessional NICU team, each bringing a unique perspective. Yet, there is limited literature reflecting these diverse points of view. Although NICU staff often endorse the sentiment that high-quality communication is essential for excellent patient care, it is not clear that providers in different roles define "high-quality communication" in the same way.

Purpose: To explore interprofessional perspectives of NICU personnel on communication quality.

Methods: One-question semi-structured interviews were conducted with NICU staff. Thematic analysis was used to explore and compare themes across disciplines.

Results: Sixty-two staff members were interviewed. Two thematic categories emerged: messaging and dynamics. Messaging sub-themes included: 1) clarity (setting goals; clear and direct language; avoiding jargon; ensuring parents understand) and 2) timing and approach (unhurried; frequent; timely; proactive). Dynamics sub-themes included: 1) team interactions (inclusivity; respect; consistency) and 2) parent-centeredness (parents as key stakeholders; identifying and adapting to needs; creating a safe space; empathy; offering flexible modes of communication).

Implications for practice and research: Although staff members across disciplines have different foci relative to communication quality, excellent communication among teams is essential to ensuring high-quality communication with families. Improving team dynamics, equipping teams with a shared model of communication quality, and ensuring adequate staffing may improve communication.

新生儿重症监护病房沟通质量的跨专业视角:一项定性研究。
背景:在新生儿重症监护病房(NICU)环境中,与父母的沟通既重要又具有独特的挑战性。先前的研究已经证实,在新生儿重症监护室中,沟通质量直接影响患者和家长的预后。一系列不同类型的提供者组成了跨专业的新生儿重症监护室团队,每个人都带来了独特的视角。然而,反映这些不同观点的文献有限。虽然新生儿重症监护室的工作人员经常赞同高质量的沟通对于优秀的病人护理至关重要的观点,但不同角色的提供者是否以相同的方式定义“高质量的沟通”并不清楚。目的:探讨新生儿重症监护室工作人员沟通质量的跨专业视角。方法:对NICU工作人员进行单问题半结构化访谈。主题分析用于探索和比较跨学科的主题。结果:采访了62名工作人员。出现了两个主题类别:消息传递和动态。信息传递的子主题包括:1)清晰(设定目标;语言清晰直接;避免行话;确保家长理解)和2)时机和方法(不慌不忙;频繁;及时;积极主动)。动力学的子主题包括:1)团队互动(包容、尊重、一致性)和2)以父母为中心(父母作为关键利益相关者;识别和适应需求;创造安全空间;移情;提供灵活的沟通模式)。对实践和研究的启示:尽管跨学科的工作人员在沟通质量方面有不同的重点,但团队之间良好的沟通对于确保与家庭的高质量沟通至关重要。改善团队动态,为团队配备共享的沟通质量模型,并确保足够的人员配备可以改善沟通。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书