Clinical utility of cerebrospinal fluid interleukin-10 in central nervous system lymphoma: a molecular neuropathology-informed diagnostic meta-analysis.

IF 4.2
Farnoosh Aalami, Alireza Mobasheri, Ali Shahriari, Amir H Aalami
{"title":"Clinical utility of cerebrospinal fluid interleukin-10 in central nervous system lymphoma: a molecular neuropathology-informed diagnostic meta-analysis.","authors":"Farnoosh Aalami, Alireza Mobasheri, Ali Shahriari, Amir H Aalami","doi":"10.1007/s00109-026-02688-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Accurate diagnosis of central nervous system lymphoma (CNSL) remains challenging, and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) interleukin-10 (IL-10) has emerged as a promising minimally invasive biomarker. We conducted a PRISMA-DTA systematic review and diagnostic meta-analysis to evaluate the diagnostic performance of CSF IL-10 for CNSL and to examine its clinical utility and robustness using a reproducible Python-based workflow. Eleven studies comprising 1,462 participants (510 CNSL cases and 952 controls) met the inclusion criteria. Using a bivariate random-effects model, the pooled sensitivity and specificity were 79.8% (95% CI, 76.1-83.2) and 94.8% (95% CI, 93.2-96.0), respectively. The pooled positive likelihood ratio was 18.04 (95% CI, 8.35-38.98), the negative likelihood ratio was 0.185 (95% CI, 0.118-0.291), and the diagnostic odds ratio was 130.55 (95% CI, 47.85-356.14). The summary receiver operating characteristic curve demonstrated excellent overall accuracy, with an area under the curve of 0.973 and a Q* index of 0.9246. Leave-one-out sensitivity analysis showed only modest changes in the pooled estimates, supporting the stability of the results. Δ-sensitivity ranged from - 1.9% to + 3.0% and Δ-specificity from - 1.1% to + 2.0%, supporting robustness. Fagan's analysis, using a pre-test probability of 34.9%, yielded post-test probabilities of 90.6% following a positive result and 9.0% following a negative result. Publication bias was suggested by Begg's test (τ = 0.400, p = 0.0434) and Egger's test (intercept = 3.283, 95% CI, 1.337-5.229; p = 0.0021), while trim-and-fill analysis indicated potential small-study effects. Overall, CSF IL-10 demonstrates high diagnostic accuracy and strong rule-in utility for CNSL. However, prospective multicenter studies with standardized thresholds and pre-analytical protocols are needed to confirm its clinical applicability.</p>","PeriodicalId":520678,"journal":{"name":"Journal of molecular medicine (Berlin, Germany)","volume":"104 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of molecular medicine (Berlin, Germany)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00109-026-02688-4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Accurate diagnosis of central nervous system lymphoma (CNSL) remains challenging, and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) interleukin-10 (IL-10) has emerged as a promising minimally invasive biomarker. We conducted a PRISMA-DTA systematic review and diagnostic meta-analysis to evaluate the diagnostic performance of CSF IL-10 for CNSL and to examine its clinical utility and robustness using a reproducible Python-based workflow. Eleven studies comprising 1,462 participants (510 CNSL cases and 952 controls) met the inclusion criteria. Using a bivariate random-effects model, the pooled sensitivity and specificity were 79.8% (95% CI, 76.1-83.2) and 94.8% (95% CI, 93.2-96.0), respectively. The pooled positive likelihood ratio was 18.04 (95% CI, 8.35-38.98), the negative likelihood ratio was 0.185 (95% CI, 0.118-0.291), and the diagnostic odds ratio was 130.55 (95% CI, 47.85-356.14). The summary receiver operating characteristic curve demonstrated excellent overall accuracy, with an area under the curve of 0.973 and a Q* index of 0.9246. Leave-one-out sensitivity analysis showed only modest changes in the pooled estimates, supporting the stability of the results. Δ-sensitivity ranged from - 1.9% to + 3.0% and Δ-specificity from - 1.1% to + 2.0%, supporting robustness. Fagan's analysis, using a pre-test probability of 34.9%, yielded post-test probabilities of 90.6% following a positive result and 9.0% following a negative result. Publication bias was suggested by Begg's test (τ = 0.400, p = 0.0434) and Egger's test (intercept = 3.283, 95% CI, 1.337-5.229; p = 0.0021), while trim-and-fill analysis indicated potential small-study effects. Overall, CSF IL-10 demonstrates high diagnostic accuracy and strong rule-in utility for CNSL. However, prospective multicenter studies with standardized thresholds and pre-analytical protocols are needed to confirm its clinical applicability.

脑脊液白介素-10在中枢神经系统淋巴瘤中的临床应用:一项分子神经病理学诊断荟萃分析。
中枢神经系统淋巴瘤(CNSL)的准确诊断仍然具有挑战性,脑脊液(CSF)白介素-10 (IL-10)已成为一种有前途的微创生物标志物。我们进行了PRISMA-DTA系统评价和诊断荟萃分析,以评估CSF IL-10对CNSL的诊断性能,并使用可重复的基于python的工作流程检查其临床实用性和稳健性。11项研究包括1462名参与者(510例CNSL病例和952例对照)符合纳入标准。使用双变量随机效应模型,合并敏感性和特异性分别为79.8% (95% CI, 76.1-83.2)和94.8% (95% CI, 93.2-96.0)。合并阳性似然比为18.04 (95% CI, 8.35 ~ 38.98),阴性似然比为0.185 (95% CI, 0.118 ~ 0.291),诊断优势比为130.55 (95% CI, 47.85 ~ 356.14)。综合受试者工作特征曲线总体准确度较高,曲线下面积为0.973,Q*指数为0.9246。留一敏感性分析显示,汇总估计值只有适度的变化,支持结果的稳定性。Δ-sensitivity的范围从- 1.9%到+ 3.0%,Δ-specificity的范围从- 1.1%到+ 2.0%,支持了稳健性。Fagan的分析使用前测概率为34.9%,阳性结果后测概率为90.6%,阴性结果后测概率为9.0%。Begg检验(τ = 0.400, p = 0.0434)和Egger检验(截距= 3.283,95% CI, 1.337-5.229; p = 0.0021)提示发表偏倚,而补齐分析提示潜在的小研究效应。总的来说,CSF IL-10对CNSL具有较高的诊断准确性和很强的规则实用性。然而,需要标准化阈值和分析前方案的前瞻性多中心研究来证实其临床适用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书