Efficacy and safety of intrathecal adjuvants in lower limb orthopaedic surgery: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.

IF 4.1
Martina Ollosu, Vincenzo Francesco Tripodi, Claudio Cardia, Debora Fois, Renata Demeglio, Gabriele Finco, Mario Musu, Mariachiara Ippolito, Andrea Cortegiani, Salvatore Sardo
{"title":"Efficacy and safety of intrathecal adjuvants in lower limb orthopaedic surgery: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.","authors":"Martina Ollosu, Vincenzo Francesco Tripodi, Claudio Cardia, Debora Fois, Renata Demeglio, Gabriele Finco, Mario Musu, Mariachiara Ippolito, Andrea Cortegiani, Salvatore Sardo","doi":"10.1186/s44158-026-00427-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Intrathecal adjuvants are frequently used in spinal anaesthesia for lower-limb surgery to enhance block quality and prolong postoperative analgesia. However, evidence remains fragmented across individual agents. This systematic review with frequentist network meta-analysis aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of intrathecal adjuvants in patients undergoing lower limb orthopaedic surgery to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of intrathecal adjuvants combined with long-acting local anaesthetics for lower limb orthopaedic surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic search of PubMed, CENTRAL, and Embase was conducted to retrieve English-language RCTs involving adult patients undergoing lower limb orthopaedic surgery under single-shot spinal anaesthesia. We included trials evaluating any intrathecal drug or placebo added to a long-acting local anaesthetic. Our primary outcome was the duration of effective analgesia, defined as the time to the first analgesic requirement, in hours. We selected randomised controlled trials (RCTs) reported in English.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 183 RCTs, for a total of 14,431 patients and 27 interventions. Morphine combined with ketorolac, morphine alone followed by diamorphine, clonidine combined with morphine and ketamine combined with midazolam provided the greatest prolongation of effective analgesia. Morphine also significantly reduced pain at 12 h and postoperative opioid consumption with no impact on motor block duration. Dexmedetomidine reduced pain intensity at 12 h but substantially prolonged motor block duration and increased the incidence of bradycardia. Morphine and neostigmine showed an increased risk of postoperative nausea and vomiting, while several interventions increased the risk of pruritus. The certainty of evidence ranged from low to very low due to within-study bias, reporting bias, high heterogeneity, imprecision and incoherence.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Considering the body of evidence in an NMA framework, intrathecal morphine appears to offer a potentially favourable efficacy-safety balance. Dexmedetomidine may prolong motor block and increase the risk of bradycardia. The certainty of the evidence was low to very low and needs caution interpretation.</p><p><strong>Systematic review registration: </strong>PROSPERO CRD42024557751.</p>","PeriodicalId":73597,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Anesthesia, Analgesia and Critical Care (Online)","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13523280/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Anesthesia, Analgesia and Critical Care (Online)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s44158-026-00427-2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Intrathecal adjuvants are frequently used in spinal anaesthesia for lower-limb surgery to enhance block quality and prolong postoperative analgesia. However, evidence remains fragmented across individual agents. This systematic review with frequentist network meta-analysis aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of intrathecal adjuvants in patients undergoing lower limb orthopaedic surgery to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of intrathecal adjuvants combined with long-acting local anaesthetics for lower limb orthopaedic surgery.

Methods: A systematic search of PubMed, CENTRAL, and Embase was conducted to retrieve English-language RCTs involving adult patients undergoing lower limb orthopaedic surgery under single-shot spinal anaesthesia. We included trials evaluating any intrathecal drug or placebo added to a long-acting local anaesthetic. Our primary outcome was the duration of effective analgesia, defined as the time to the first analgesic requirement, in hours. We selected randomised controlled trials (RCTs) reported in English.

Results: We included 183 RCTs, for a total of 14,431 patients and 27 interventions. Morphine combined with ketorolac, morphine alone followed by diamorphine, clonidine combined with morphine and ketamine combined with midazolam provided the greatest prolongation of effective analgesia. Morphine also significantly reduced pain at 12 h and postoperative opioid consumption with no impact on motor block duration. Dexmedetomidine reduced pain intensity at 12 h but substantially prolonged motor block duration and increased the incidence of bradycardia. Morphine and neostigmine showed an increased risk of postoperative nausea and vomiting, while several interventions increased the risk of pruritus. The certainty of evidence ranged from low to very low due to within-study bias, reporting bias, high heterogeneity, imprecision and incoherence.

Conclusions: Considering the body of evidence in an NMA framework, intrathecal morphine appears to offer a potentially favourable efficacy-safety balance. Dexmedetomidine may prolong motor block and increase the risk of bradycardia. The certainty of the evidence was low to very low and needs caution interpretation.

Systematic review registration: PROSPERO CRD42024557751.

鞘内佐剂在下肢矫形手术中的有效性和安全性:随机对照试验的系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
背景:鞘内佐剂常用于下肢手术脊髓麻醉,以提高阻滞质量和延长术后镇痛时间。然而,证据仍然分散在个体代理人之间。本系统综述采用frequentist network荟萃分析,旨在比较鞘内佐剂在下肢骨科手术患者中的疗效和安全性,以评估鞘内佐剂联合长效局麻药在下肢骨科手术中的有效性和安全性。方法:系统检索PubMed、CENTRAL和Embase,检索涉及单针脊髓麻醉下接受下肢骨科手术的成年患者的英语rct。我们纳入了评估任何鞘内药物或安慰剂加入长效局部麻醉剂的试验。我们的主要终点是有效镇痛的持续时间,定义为到第一次需要镇痛的时间,以小时为单位。我们选择了用英文报道的随机对照试验(RCTs)。结果:我们纳入183项随机对照试验,共纳入14431例患者和27项干预措施。吗啡联用酮咯酸、吗啡单用后再用二吗啡、可乐定联用吗啡、氯胺酮联用咪达唑仑延长有效镇痛时间最大。吗啡也显著减少了12小时的疼痛和术后阿片类药物的消耗,对运动阻滞持续时间没有影响。右美托咪定减轻了12小时的疼痛强度,但显著延长了运动阻滞持续时间,增加了心动过缓的发生率。吗啡和新斯的明增加了术后恶心和呕吐的风险,而一些干预措施增加了瘙痒的风险。由于研究内偏倚、报告偏倚、高度异质性、不精确和不连贯,证据的确定性从低到非常低。结论:考虑到NMA框架中的大量证据,鞘内吗啡似乎提供了潜在的有利的疗效-安全性平衡。右美托咪定可能延长运动阻滞,增加心动过缓的风险。证据的确定性低至非常低,需要谨慎解释。系统评价注册:PROSPERO CRD42024557751。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书