Using Pragmatic Co-Design Processes in a Resource-Constrained Regional Health Service: Insights From the TROPICAL-VIC Early Referral to Palliative Care Project.

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING
Stacey Ann Rich, Jennifer Philip, Annie Williams, Anna Griffith, Kathleen Wilkins, Chi Li, Christopher Steer, Diane Davey, Michelle Hensel, Nicole Webb, Tanya Dawe, Craig Underhill
{"title":"Using Pragmatic Co-Design Processes in a Resource-Constrained Regional Health Service: Insights From the TROPICAL-VIC Early Referral to Palliative Care Project.","authors":"Stacey Ann Rich, Jennifer Philip, Annie Williams, Anna Griffith, Kathleen Wilkins, Chi Li, Christopher Steer, Diane Davey, Michelle Hensel, Nicole Webb, Tanya Dawe, Craig Underhill","doi":"10.1111/ajr.70224","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To describe an evidence-informed, experience-based co-design process used to adapt metropolitan early palliative care referral models for implementation in a regional Australian health service.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A scoping review of palliative care delivery and early referral models to inform evidence-informed, experience-based co-design workshops involving consumers, clinicians, and health service staff.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Sequential mixed-methods development study comprising evidence synthesis to identify model components, followed by two iterative workshops to construct and refine a context-appropriate outpatient early referral model.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>A regional public health service in Victoria, Australia, seeking to establish an outpatient early referral palliative care clinic for people with advanced cancer.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Purposefully sampled stakeholders (patients/carers, oncologists, palliative care clinicians, cancer care coordinators, Aboriginal health worker, managers, and researchers) took part in two online workshops.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Co-designed model structure and components, perceived feasibility in a resource-constrained regional context, and agreed service scope and patient eligibility.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The process generated a regionally tailored early referral pathway incorporating needs-based screening, prioritisation to manage limited capacity, and staged roll-out initially focused on selected cancer groups. These adaptations, while pragmatic, highlight the resourcing disparities faced by rural and regional services and the equity implications of resource-driven variation in care delivery.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Evidence-informed co-design enabled pragmatic adaptation of metropolitan palliative care models to a regional setting and offers a transferable approach for other rural and regional services.</p>","PeriodicalId":55421,"journal":{"name":"Australian Journal of Rural Health","volume":"34 3","pages":"e70224"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Journal of Rural Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ajr.70224","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To describe an evidence-informed, experience-based co-design process used to adapt metropolitan early palliative care referral models for implementation in a regional Australian health service.

Methods: A scoping review of palliative care delivery and early referral models to inform evidence-informed, experience-based co-design workshops involving consumers, clinicians, and health service staff.

Design: Sequential mixed-methods development study comprising evidence synthesis to identify model components, followed by two iterative workshops to construct and refine a context-appropriate outpatient early referral model.

Setting: A regional public health service in Victoria, Australia, seeking to establish an outpatient early referral palliative care clinic for people with advanced cancer.

Participants: Purposefully sampled stakeholders (patients/carers, oncologists, palliative care clinicians, cancer care coordinators, Aboriginal health worker, managers, and researchers) took part in two online workshops.

Main outcome measures: Co-designed model structure and components, perceived feasibility in a resource-constrained regional context, and agreed service scope and patient eligibility.

Results: The process generated a regionally tailored early referral pathway incorporating needs-based screening, prioritisation to manage limited capacity, and staged roll-out initially focused on selected cancer groups. These adaptations, while pragmatic, highlight the resourcing disparities faced by rural and regional services and the equity implications of resource-driven variation in care delivery.

Conclusions: Evidence-informed co-design enabled pragmatic adaptation of metropolitan palliative care models to a regional setting and offers a transferable approach for other rural and regional services.

在资源受限的区域卫生服务中使用务实的协同设计过程:来自TROPICAL-VIC早期转诊到姑息治疗项目的见解。
目的:描述一个循证的、基于经验的共同设计过程,用于适应大都市早期姑息治疗转诊模式,以便在澳大利亚区域卫生服务中实施。方法:对姑息治疗提供和早期转诊模式进行范围审查,为涉及消费者、临床医生和卫生服务人员的循证、基于经验的共同设计研讨会提供信息。设计:顺序混合方法开发研究,包括证据综合,以确定模型的组成部分,随后是两个迭代研讨会,以构建和完善一个适合环境的门诊早期转诊模型。环境:澳大利亚维多利亚州的一个区域公共卫生服务机构,寻求为晚期癌症患者建立一个门诊早期转诊姑息治疗诊所。参与者:有目的地抽样的利益相关者(患者/护理人员、肿瘤学家、姑息治疗临床医生、癌症护理协调员、土著卫生工作者、管理人员和研究人员)参加了两个在线讲习班。主要结果测量:共同设计的模型结构和组件,在资源有限的地区环境下的可行性,商定的服务范围和患者资格。结果:该过程产生了一个区域量身定制的早期转诊途径,包括基于需求的筛查,管理有限能力的优先次序,以及最初专注于选定癌症群体的分阶段推广。这些调整虽然务实,但突出了农村和区域服务面临的资源差异,以及资源驱动的医疗服务差异对公平的影响。结论:循证共同设计使大都市姑息治疗模式在区域环境中具有实用性,并为其他农村和区域服务提供了可转移的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Australian Journal of Rural Health
Australian Journal of Rural Health 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
16.70%
发文量
122
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: The Australian Journal of Rural Health publishes articles in the field of rural health. It facilitates the formation of interdisciplinary networks, so that rural health professionals can form a cohesive group and work together for the advancement of rural practice, in all health disciplines. The Journal aims to establish a national and international reputation for the quality of its scholarly discourse and its value to rural health professionals. All articles, unless otherwise identified, are peer reviewed by at least two researchers expert in the field of the submitted paper.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书