Platelet-Rich Plasma Therapy for Refractory Skin Ulcers: A Case Series of 12 Patients and Concise Review of the Literature

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 DERMATOLOGY
Journal of Dermatology Pub Date : 2026-08-04 Epub Date: 2026-06-19 DOI:10.1111/1346-8138.70365
Teruhiko Makino, Keita Takemoto, Megumi Mizawa, Tadamichi Shimizu
{"title":"Platelet-Rich Plasma Therapy for Refractory Skin Ulcers: A Case Series of 12 Patients and Concise Review of the Literature","authors":"Teruhiko Makino,&nbsp;Keita Takemoto,&nbsp;Megumi Mizawa,&nbsp;Tadamichi Shimizu","doi":"10.1111/1346-8138.70365","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Chronic skin ulcers remain a significant therapeutic challenge, particularly in patients with underlying medical conditions, and often prove difficult to treat with conventional methods. Platelet-rich plasma (PRP), an autologous preparation rich in growth factors, has garnered attention as a promising treatment option; however, its clinical efficacy remains inconsistent. In this study, we retrospectively evaluated 12 patients with refractory skin ulcers who received PRP therapy between 2018 and 2023. PRP was prepared from the patients' own blood and administered once weekly for 4 weeks; treatment efficacy was assessed based on the rate of reduction in ulcer area. Clinical outcomes varied depending on the etiology of the ulcer. Marked improvement was observed in patients with livedoid vasculopathy and burn-related ulcers, whereas moderate to marked improvement was seen in diabetic ulcers only when peripheral blood flow was preserved. In contrast, the response was minimal or absent in ulcers associated with pressure ulcers or peripheral arterial disease. Importantly, no adverse events were observed during treatment. These findings suggest that PRP therapy is a safe and potentially effective option for refractory skin ulcers, particularly in non-ischemic conditions. However, its efficacy appears to be limited in wounds involving ischemia or mechanical injury, highlighting the importance of appropriate patient selection and wound condition optimization. Further studies using standardized protocols are necessary to clarify its clinical indications.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":54848,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Dermatology","volume":"53 8","pages":"1208-1212"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Dermatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1346-8138.70365","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/6/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Chronic skin ulcers remain a significant therapeutic challenge, particularly in patients with underlying medical conditions, and often prove difficult to treat with conventional methods. Platelet-rich plasma (PRP), an autologous preparation rich in growth factors, has garnered attention as a promising treatment option; however, its clinical efficacy remains inconsistent. In this study, we retrospectively evaluated 12 patients with refractory skin ulcers who received PRP therapy between 2018 and 2023. PRP was prepared from the patients' own blood and administered once weekly for 4 weeks; treatment efficacy was assessed based on the rate of reduction in ulcer area. Clinical outcomes varied depending on the etiology of the ulcer. Marked improvement was observed in patients with livedoid vasculopathy and burn-related ulcers, whereas moderate to marked improvement was seen in diabetic ulcers only when peripheral blood flow was preserved. In contrast, the response was minimal or absent in ulcers associated with pressure ulcers or peripheral arterial disease. Importantly, no adverse events were observed during treatment. These findings suggest that PRP therapy is a safe and potentially effective option for refractory skin ulcers, particularly in non-ischemic conditions. However, its efficacy appears to be limited in wounds involving ischemia or mechanical injury, highlighting the importance of appropriate patient selection and wound condition optimization. Further studies using standardized protocols are necessary to clarify its clinical indications.

富血小板血浆治疗难治性皮肤溃疡:12例病例及文献综述。
慢性皮肤溃疡仍然是一个重大的治疗挑战,特别是对于有潜在疾病的患者,并且通常难以用传统方法治疗。富血小板血浆(PRP)是一种富含生长因子的自体制剂,作为一种有前景的治疗选择而受到关注;然而,其临床疗效仍不一致。在这项研究中,我们回顾性评估了2018年至2023年间接受PRP治疗的12例难治性皮肤溃疡患者。从患者自身血液中制备PRP,每周给药1次,连续4周;根据溃疡面积缩小率评估治疗效果。临床结果因溃疡的病因而异。在类活体血管病变和烧伤相关溃疡患者中观察到明显的改善,而在糖尿病溃疡患者中,只有当外周血流量保持不变时,才能观察到中度至显著的改善。相比之下,与压疮或外周动脉疾病相关的溃疡反应很小或没有反应。重要的是,在治疗期间没有观察到不良事件。这些发现表明,PRP治疗是难治性皮肤溃疡的一种安全且潜在有效的选择,特别是在非缺血性情况下。然而,它的功效似乎在涉及缺血或机械损伤的伤口有限,突出了适当的患者选择和伤口状况优化的重要性。有必要采用标准化方案进行进一步研究,以明确其临床适应症。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Dermatology
Journal of Dermatology 医学-皮肤病学
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
9.70%
发文量
368
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Dermatology is the official peer-reviewed publication of the Japanese Dermatological Association and the Asian Dermatological Association. The journal aims to provide a forum for the exchange of information about new and significant research in dermatology and to promote the discipline of dermatology in Japan and throughout the world. Research articles are supplemented by reviews, theoretical articles, special features, commentaries, book reviews and proceedings of workshops and conferences. Preliminary or short reports and letters to the editor of two printed pages or less will be published as soon as possible. Papers in all fields of dermatology will be considered.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书