Role of electronic health record in stigma experiences, trust, and care decisions by women with history of pregnancy and substance use disorder: a qualitative study of perceptions of clinical note language.

IF 7.1 2区 医学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS
Meghan E Davis, Mohit Sharma, Jessica S Ancker, Jyotishman Pathak, Marianne Sharko
{"title":"Role of electronic health record in stigma experiences, trust, and care decisions by women with history of pregnancy and substance use disorder: a qualitative study of perceptions of clinical note language.","authors":"Meghan E Davis, Mohit Sharma, Jessica S Ancker, Jyotishman Pathak, Marianne Sharko","doi":"10.1093/jamia/ocag096","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Stigma impacts outcomes across stigmatizing conditions, including substance use disorders (SUDs). Recent policy changes give patients rapid access to clinical notes in the electronic health record (EHR), which may include stigmatizing language. The objective of this study was to assess the perspectives of women with history of pregnancy and SUDs on typical language used in clinical notes.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Women with a history of pregnancy and SUD were recruited through an online crowd-sourcing platform. Respondents viewed examples of clinical language and answered survey questions about perceived stigma. An inductive approach was used to analyze open-text responses, and themes were developed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Three hundred seventy survey respondents wrote a response to at least one open-text question. Thematic analysis yielded 4 major themes: (1) anticipation of future stigma facilitated by EHR documentation can affect patients' care decisions for themselves and their babies; (2) documented SUD history could have short- and long-term effects on patients' experience of stigma and discrimination, especially in labor and delivery; (3) phrases using \"denies\" and quotes within quotation marks could be perceived as stigmatizing and decrease trust in providers; (4) nonstigmatizing language and acknowledgement of recovery in notes can facilitate positive experiences for patients, but patients want more acknowledgement of recovery and positive language.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Electronic health record documentation can modulate stigma experiences for women during and after pregnancy through stigmatizing language in clinical notes and facilitating discrimination, decreasing trust in providers and negatively impacting health outcomes. Raising providers' awareness of nonstigmatizing and positive language or implementing technology to prompt nonstigmatizing terminology could contribute to positive experiences among women with a history of pregnancy and SUD.</p>","PeriodicalId":50016,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association","volume":" ","pages":"1748-1758"},"PeriodicalIF":7.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13580747/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocag096","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Stigma impacts outcomes across stigmatizing conditions, including substance use disorders (SUDs). Recent policy changes give patients rapid access to clinical notes in the electronic health record (EHR), which may include stigmatizing language. The objective of this study was to assess the perspectives of women with history of pregnancy and SUDs on typical language used in clinical notes.

Materials and methods: Women with a history of pregnancy and SUD were recruited through an online crowd-sourcing platform. Respondents viewed examples of clinical language and answered survey questions about perceived stigma. An inductive approach was used to analyze open-text responses, and themes were developed.

Results: Three hundred seventy survey respondents wrote a response to at least one open-text question. Thematic analysis yielded 4 major themes: (1) anticipation of future stigma facilitated by EHR documentation can affect patients' care decisions for themselves and their babies; (2) documented SUD history could have short- and long-term effects on patients' experience of stigma and discrimination, especially in labor and delivery; (3) phrases using "denies" and quotes within quotation marks could be perceived as stigmatizing and decrease trust in providers; (4) nonstigmatizing language and acknowledgement of recovery in notes can facilitate positive experiences for patients, but patients want more acknowledgement of recovery and positive language.

Conclusion: Electronic health record documentation can modulate stigma experiences for women during and after pregnancy through stigmatizing language in clinical notes and facilitating discrimination, decreasing trust in providers and negatively impacting health outcomes. Raising providers' awareness of nonstigmatizing and positive language or implementing technology to prompt nonstigmatizing terminology could contribute to positive experiences among women with a history of pregnancy and SUD.

电子健康记录在怀孕史和物质使用障碍妇女的耻辱经历、信任和护理决策中的作用:临床记录语言感知的定性研究
目的:耻辱感影响包括物质使用障碍(sud)在内的耻辱感状况的结果。最近的政策变化使患者能够快速访问电子健康记录(EHR)中的临床记录,其中可能包括污名化的语言。本研究的目的是评估有妊娠史和患有sud的妇女对临床记录中使用的典型语言的看法。材料和方法:通过网络众包平台招募有妊娠史和SUD的女性。受访者观看了临床语言的例子,并回答了有关感知耻辱的调查问题。采用归纳方法分析开放文本回复,并制定主题。结果:370名调查对象对至少一个开放文本问题写了回答。主题分析得出了4个主要主题:(1)电子健康档案促进了对未来污名的预期,可以影响患者对自己和婴儿的护理决策;(2)记录在案的SUD病史可能对患者的污名和歧视经历产生短期和长期影响,特别是在分娩和分娩时;(3)使用“否认”和引号内引号的短语可能被视为侮辱和降低对提供者的信任;(4)笔记中非污名化的语言和对康复的认可可以促进患者的积极体验,但患者更需要对康复的认可和积极的语言。结论:电子健康记录文件可以通过临床记录中的污名化语言和促进歧视,降低对提供者的信任并对健康结果产生负面影响,从而调节妇女在怀孕期间和怀孕后的污名化经历。提高提供者对非污名化和积极语言的认识,或实施技术来促进非污名化术语,可能有助于有怀孕史和SUD的妇女获得积极的经历。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 医学-计算机:跨学科应用
CiteScore
14.50
自引率
7.80%
发文量
230
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: JAMIA is AMIA''s premier peer-reviewed journal for biomedical and health informatics. Covering the full spectrum of activities in the field, JAMIA includes informatics articles in the areas of clinical care, clinical research, translational science, implementation science, imaging, education, consumer health, public health, and policy. JAMIA''s articles describe innovative informatics research and systems that help to advance biomedical science and to promote health. Case reports, perspectives and reviews also help readers stay connected with the most important informatics developments in implementation, policy and education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书