Effects of lower limb joint manipulation on squat strength and ankle range of motion: a sham-controlled double-blind randomised cross-over trial.

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q2 REHABILITATION
Reneigh Morley-Hart, Barrett Losco, Alasdair R Dempsey, G Gregory Haff, Sasha L Aspinall
{"title":"Effects of lower limb joint manipulation on squat strength and ankle range of motion: a sham-controlled double-blind randomised cross-over trial.","authors":"Reneigh Morley-Hart, Barrett Losco, Alasdair R Dempsey, G Gregory Haff, Sasha L Aspinall","doi":"10.1186/s12998-026-00659-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The back squat is a commonly prescribed exercise for developing lower body strength. The ability to squat can be affected by reduced ankle dorsiflexion range of motion (DF-ROM), leading to limited squat depth and dysfunctional compensatory movement patterns.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the effect of high-velocity low-amplitude lower limb manipulations on 1 repetition maximum (1RM) back squat strength, sagittal plane ankle kinematics during a squat, and active DF-ROM in individuals with asymptomatic deficits in DF-ROM.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty-six enrolled; Twenty-four analysed resistance-trained participants with asymptomatic deficits in DF-ROM participated in this double-blind randomised sham-controlled cross-over trial. Interventions involved high-velocity low-amplitude joint manipulations targeting ankle DF-ROM, and a sham which mimicked the manipulations using a mechanical drop mechanism. The primary outcome was a change in back squat 1RM between baseline to post-intervention, with secondary outcomes being maximal ankle DF-ROM during the 1RM squat using 3D motion capture, and change in DF-ROM during the weightbearing lunge test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was no statistically significant difference between interventions for back squat 1RM (p = 0.27). From baseline, the 1RM increased by 4.75 kg (3.6%) following manipulation and 2.75 kg (2.1%) following the sham. There were no statistically significant differences between interventions on maximal DF-ROM during the back squat (p = 0.24) and no statistically significant differences in ankle DF-ROM immediately following either intervention (p = 0.39).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Based on these results a single session of high-velocity low-amplitude manipulations targeting ankle DF-ROM does not significantly improve 1RM back squat strength compared to sham, and does not influence short-term ankle DF-ROM. Trial registration The study was pre-registered with ANZCTR (ACTRN12622000811707).</p>","PeriodicalId":48572,"journal":{"name":"Chiropractic & Manual Therapies","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13488007/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chiropractic & Manual Therapies","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12998-026-00659-7","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The back squat is a commonly prescribed exercise for developing lower body strength. The ability to squat can be affected by reduced ankle dorsiflexion range of motion (DF-ROM), leading to limited squat depth and dysfunctional compensatory movement patterns.

Objective: To investigate the effect of high-velocity low-amplitude lower limb manipulations on 1 repetition maximum (1RM) back squat strength, sagittal plane ankle kinematics during a squat, and active DF-ROM in individuals with asymptomatic deficits in DF-ROM.

Methods: Twenty-six enrolled; Twenty-four analysed resistance-trained participants with asymptomatic deficits in DF-ROM participated in this double-blind randomised sham-controlled cross-over trial. Interventions involved high-velocity low-amplitude joint manipulations targeting ankle DF-ROM, and a sham which mimicked the manipulations using a mechanical drop mechanism. The primary outcome was a change in back squat 1RM between baseline to post-intervention, with secondary outcomes being maximal ankle DF-ROM during the 1RM squat using 3D motion capture, and change in DF-ROM during the weightbearing lunge test.

Results: There was no statistically significant difference between interventions for back squat 1RM (p = 0.27). From baseline, the 1RM increased by 4.75 kg (3.6%) following manipulation and 2.75 kg (2.1%) following the sham. There were no statistically significant differences between interventions on maximal DF-ROM during the back squat (p = 0.24) and no statistically significant differences in ankle DF-ROM immediately following either intervention (p = 0.39).

Conclusion: Based on these results a single session of high-velocity low-amplitude manipulations targeting ankle DF-ROM does not significantly improve 1RM back squat strength compared to sham, and does not influence short-term ankle DF-ROM. Trial registration The study was pre-registered with ANZCTR (ACTRN12622000811707).

下肢关节操作对深蹲力量和踝关节活动范围的影响:一项假对照双盲随机交叉试验。
背景:后蹲是一种常用的锻炼锻炼下半身的力量。踝关节背屈活动范围(DF-ROM)减少会影响深蹲的能力,导致深蹲深度受限和代偿运动模式功能失调。目的:探讨高速低幅度下肢手法对无症状DF-ROM缺陷个体的1次最大重复(1RM)后蹲强度、深蹲时踝关节矢状面运动学和活跃DF-ROM的影响。方法:纳入26例;24例经分析的抗阻力训练的DF-ROM无症状缺陷的参与者参加了这项双盲随机假对照交叉试验。干预包括针对踝关节DF-ROM的高速低振幅关节操作,以及使用机械跌落机制模拟操作的假手术。主要结果是基线至干预后后蹲1RM的变化,次要结果是1RM深蹲期间使用3D运动捕捉的最大踝关节DF-ROM,以及负重弓步测试期间DF-ROM的变化。结果:后蹲1RM干预间差异无统计学意义(p = 0.27)。从基线开始,操作后1RM增加4.75 kg(3.6%),假手术后增加2.75 kg(2.1%)。两种干预措施对后蹲时最大DF-ROM的影响差异无统计学意义(p = 0.24),两种干预措施后立即踝关节DF-ROM的影响差异无统计学意义(p = 0.39)。结论:基于这些结果,与假手术相比,针对踝关节DF-ROM的单次高速低幅度操作并不能显著提高1RM后蹲强度,也不会影响短期踝关节DF-ROM。该研究在ANZCTR进行了预注册(ACTRN12622000811707)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Chiropractic & Manual Therapies
Chiropractic & Manual Therapies Medicine-Complementary and Alternative Medicine
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
15.80%
发文量
48
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: Chiropractic & Manual Therapies publishes manuscripts on all aspects of evidence-based information that is clinically relevant to chiropractors, manual therapists and related health care professionals. Chiropractic & Manual Therapies is an open access journal that aims to provide chiropractors, manual therapists and related health professionals with clinically relevant, evidence-based information. Chiropractic and other manual therapies share a relatively broad diagnostic practice and treatment scope, emphasizing the structure and function of the body''s musculoskeletal framework (especially the spine). The practices of chiropractic and manual therapies are closely associated with treatments including manipulation, which is a key intervention. The range of services provided can also include massage, mobilisation, physical therapies, dry needling, lifestyle and dietary counselling, plus a variety of other associated therapeutic and rehabilitation approaches. Chiropractic & Manual Therapies continues to serve as a critical resource in this field, and as an open access publication, is more readily available to practitioners, researchers and clinicians worldwide.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书