Patrick Sun, Jennifer Eurich, Douglas Zhang, Gregory Schimizzi, Anthony Christiano, Mary Kate Erdman
{"title":"Reliability of modified Radiographic Union Scale for Tibial Fractures (mRUST) Scores in Ballistic Lower Extremity Trauma.","authors":"Patrick Sun, Jennifer Eurich, Douglas Zhang, Gregory Schimizzi, Anthony Christiano, Mary Kate Erdman","doi":"10.1097/BOT.0000000000003236","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To investigate the reliability of the modified Radiographic Union Scale for Tibial Fractures (mRUST) scores in ballistic lower extremity trauma and to assess the ability of 3-month post-op mRUST in predicting union status at 9-months.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Design: Retrospective review.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Single Level 1 Trauma Center.</p><p><strong>Patient selection criteria: </strong>Patients that sustained a ballistic femoral (AO/OTA 32) or tibial shaft fracture (AO/OTA 42) aged 18 or over and were treated with intramedullary nailing between 2019 and 2023.</p><p><strong>Outcome measures and comparisons: </strong>Inter- and intra-rater reliability of mRUST score measurements between three fellowship trained orthopaedic trauma surgeons was assessed. The sensitivity and specificity of predicting nonunion at 9-months postoperatively from mRUST 3-months postoperatively was assessed. Inclusion criteria for nonunion analysis required patients to have a 3-month mRUST score as well as a determinable union status.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>107 ballistic femoral shaft fractures (203 radiograph sets; 100 male; mean age 31 [18-56]) and 62 ballistic tibial shaft fractures (153 radiograph sets; 51 male; mean age 33 [18-61]) were used to calculate reliability metrics. Inter-rater reliability (Intraclass Correlation Coefficient, ICC) of mRUST in ballistic femoral shaft fractures was 0.64 (95% CI[0.34,0.80]). Intra-rater reliability of mRUST in ballistic femoral shaft fractures was 0.87 (95% CI[0.85,0.89]). Inter-rater reliability of mRUST in ballistic tibial shaft fractures was 0.61 (95% CI[0.43,0.73]) and intra-rater reliability of mRUST in ballistic tibial shaft fractures was 0.81 (95% CI[0.77, 0.84]). In 28 ballistic femoral shaft fractures (24 male; mean age 31 [18-46]), an mRUST-3MO < 8 predicted nonunion in ballistic femoral shaft fractures with a sensitivity of 1.00 and specificity of 0.83. In 25 ballistic tibial shaft fractures (17 males; mean age 34 [18-61]), an mRUST-3MO < 8 predicted nonunion with a sensitivity of 0.71 and specificity of 0.94.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study suggests that the modified Radiographic Union Scale for Tibial Fractures (mRUST) scores possess a lower inter and intra rater reliability in ballistic fractures compared to blunt fractures. They may predict union at 9-months well in ballistic femoral fractures, but only moderately in ballistic tibia fractures.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Diagnostic Level III.</p>","PeriodicalId":16644,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0000000000003236","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives: To investigate the reliability of the modified Radiographic Union Scale for Tibial Fractures (mRUST) scores in ballistic lower extremity trauma and to assess the ability of 3-month post-op mRUST in predicting union status at 9-months.
Methods: Design: Retrospective review.
Setting: Single Level 1 Trauma Center.
Patient selection criteria: Patients that sustained a ballistic femoral (AO/OTA 32) or tibial shaft fracture (AO/OTA 42) aged 18 or over and were treated with intramedullary nailing between 2019 and 2023.
Outcome measures and comparisons: Inter- and intra-rater reliability of mRUST score measurements between three fellowship trained orthopaedic trauma surgeons was assessed. The sensitivity and specificity of predicting nonunion at 9-months postoperatively from mRUST 3-months postoperatively was assessed. Inclusion criteria for nonunion analysis required patients to have a 3-month mRUST score as well as a determinable union status.
Results: 107 ballistic femoral shaft fractures (203 radiograph sets; 100 male; mean age 31 [18-56]) and 62 ballistic tibial shaft fractures (153 radiograph sets; 51 male; mean age 33 [18-61]) were used to calculate reliability metrics. Inter-rater reliability (Intraclass Correlation Coefficient, ICC) of mRUST in ballistic femoral shaft fractures was 0.64 (95% CI[0.34,0.80]). Intra-rater reliability of mRUST in ballistic femoral shaft fractures was 0.87 (95% CI[0.85,0.89]). Inter-rater reliability of mRUST in ballistic tibial shaft fractures was 0.61 (95% CI[0.43,0.73]) and intra-rater reliability of mRUST in ballistic tibial shaft fractures was 0.81 (95% CI[0.77, 0.84]). In 28 ballistic femoral shaft fractures (24 male; mean age 31 [18-46]), an mRUST-3MO < 8 predicted nonunion in ballistic femoral shaft fractures with a sensitivity of 1.00 and specificity of 0.83. In 25 ballistic tibial shaft fractures (17 males; mean age 34 [18-61]), an mRUST-3MO < 8 predicted nonunion with a sensitivity of 0.71 and specificity of 0.94.
Conclusions: This study suggests that the modified Radiographic Union Scale for Tibial Fractures (mRUST) scores possess a lower inter and intra rater reliability in ballistic fractures compared to blunt fractures. They may predict union at 9-months well in ballistic femoral fractures, but only moderately in ballistic tibia fractures.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma is devoted exclusively to the diagnosis and management of hard and soft tissue trauma, including injuries to bone, muscle, ligament, and tendons, as well as spinal cord injuries. Under the guidance of a distinguished international board of editors, the journal provides the most current information on diagnostic techniques, new and improved surgical instruments and procedures, surgical implants and prosthetic devices, bioplastics and biometals; and physical therapy and rehabilitation.