Adjudicating Heart Failure Events in Participants Receiving Hemodialysis: Findings from Evaluation of Cinacalcet Hydrochloride Therapy to Lower Cardiovascular Events (EVOLVE) Trial.

IF 3.8 3区 医学 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Guson Kang, Safa Abdalla, Patrick S Parfrey, Renato D Lopes, Uptal D Patel, Gerard London, Glenn M Chertow, Kenneth W Mahaffey
{"title":"Adjudicating Heart Failure Events in Participants Receiving Hemodialysis: Findings from Evaluation of Cinacalcet Hydrochloride Therapy to Lower Cardiovascular Events (EVOLVE) Trial.","authors":"Guson Kang, Safa Abdalla, Patrick S Parfrey, Renato D Lopes, Uptal D Patel, Gerard London, Glenn M Chertow, Kenneth W Mahaffey","doi":"10.1159/000553103","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The Evaluation of Cinacalcet Hydrochloride Therapy to Lower Cardiovascular Events (EVOLVE) trial compared the effects of cinacalcet against placebo on major cardiovascular events in 3,883 hemodialysis patients with secondary hyperparathyroidism. In this manuscript, we describe heart failure events in EVOLVE and the role of centralized adjudication on heart failure reporting.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A central clinical events classification committee (CEC) defined and adjudicated suspected heart failure events reported by the site investigators. The treatment effect was analyzed by intention to treat.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 3,883 participants were enrolled, 1,366 heart failure events were reported by site investigators, and 40 potential events were identified independently by the CEC. Among site investigator-reported events, 653 (47.8%) were adjudicated by the CEC as heart failure endpoints. Of the 40 potential events identified independently by the CEC, 17 (42.5%) were adjudicated as heart failure endpoints. The effect of cinacalcet compared with placebo on time to first heart failure event using CEC-adjudicated and site investigator-reported events (10.6% and 12.2% for CEC-adjudicated events [relative hazard 0.82, 95% CI: 0.68-0.99] and 20.3% and 22.1% for site investigator-reported events [relative hazard 0.88, 95% CI: 0.77-1.01]) was similar, although CEC data included fewer events but nominally statistically significant results.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Roughly half of heart failure events reported by site investigators were not adjudicated as heart failure by the CEC. Site investigators failed to report additional events that were later adjudicated as heart failure endpoints. These findings suggest that, in the hemodialysis population, identifying and classifying heart failure events is challenging and highlight the importance of centralized adjudication to ensure specificity and consistency in clinical events ascertainment.</p>","PeriodicalId":7570,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Nephrology","volume":" ","pages":"1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13441265/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Nephrology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000553103","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The Evaluation of Cinacalcet Hydrochloride Therapy to Lower Cardiovascular Events (EVOLVE) trial compared the effects of cinacalcet against placebo on major cardiovascular events in 3,883 hemodialysis patients with secondary hyperparathyroidism. In this manuscript, we describe heart failure events in EVOLVE and the role of centralized adjudication on heart failure reporting.

Methods: A central clinical events classification committee (CEC) defined and adjudicated suspected heart failure events reported by the site investigators. The treatment effect was analyzed by intention to treat.

Results: Overall, 3,883 participants were enrolled, 1,366 heart failure events were reported by site investigators, and 40 potential events were identified independently by the CEC. Among site investigator-reported events, 653 (47.8%) were adjudicated by the CEC as heart failure endpoints. Of the 40 potential events identified independently by the CEC, 17 (42.5%) were adjudicated as heart failure endpoints. The effect of cinacalcet compared with placebo on time to first heart failure event using CEC-adjudicated and site investigator-reported events (10.6% and 12.2% for CEC-adjudicated events [relative hazard 0.82, 95% CI: 0.68-0.99] and 20.3% and 22.1% for site investigator-reported events [relative hazard 0.88, 95% CI: 0.77-1.01]) was similar, although CEC data included fewer events but nominally statistically significant results.

Conclusion: Roughly half of heart failure events reported by site investigators were not adjudicated as heart failure by the CEC. Site investigators failed to report additional events that were later adjudicated as heart failure endpoints. These findings suggest that, in the hemodialysis population, identifying and classifying heart failure events is challenging and highlight the importance of centralized adjudication to ensure specificity and consistency in clinical events ascertainment.

判定接受血液透析的参与者的心力衰竭事件:盐酸西那卡塞治疗降低心血管事件(EVOLVE)试验的评估结果。
在3,883例继发性甲状旁腺功能亢进血液透析患者中,盐酸那卡塞治疗降低心血管事件的评价(EVOLVE)试验比较了那卡塞与安慰剂对主要心血管事件的影响。在这篇文章中,我们描述了心力衰竭事件和心力衰竭报告集中裁决的作用。方法:中心临床事件分类委员会(CEC)定义和裁决现场调查人员报告的疑似心力衰竭事件。采用意向治疗法分析治疗效果。结果:总体上,3883名参与者入组,现场调查员报告了1366例心力衰竭事件,CEC独立确定了40例潜在事件。在现场调查者报告的事件中,653例(47.8%)被CEC判定为心力衰竭终点。在CEC独立确定的40个潜在事件中,17个(42.5%)被判定为心力衰竭终点。cinacalcet与安慰剂相比,在使用CEC判定和现场研究者报告的事件时,对首次心力衰竭事件的准时影响(CEC判定事件为10.6%和12.2%[相对危险度0.82,95% CI 0.68至0.99],现场研究者报告事件为20.3%和22.1%[相对危险度0.88,95% CI 0.77至1.01])相似,尽管CEC数据包括较少的事件,但名义上具有统计学意义的结果。结论:现场调查人员报告的大约一半心力衰竭事件未被CEC裁定为心力衰竭。现场调查人员未能报告后来被判定为心力衰竭终点的其他事件。这些发现表明,在血液透析人群中,识别和分类心力衰竭事件是具有挑战性的,并强调了集中裁决的重要性,以确保临床事件确定的特异性和一致性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American Journal of Nephrology
American Journal of Nephrology 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
2.40%
发文量
74
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The ''American Journal of Nephrology'' is a peer-reviewed journal that focuses on timely topics in both basic science and clinical research. Papers are divided into several sections, including:
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书