Evaluating Students' Learning Experiences in Blended Learning Environment Integrated With Interactive GeoGebra Applets: A Self-Determination Theory Perspective

IF 5.7 2区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Serpil Yorganci
{"title":"Evaluating Students' Learning Experiences in Blended Learning Environment Integrated With Interactive GeoGebra Applets: A Self-Determination Theory Perspective","authors":"Serpil Yorganci","doi":"10.1002/jcal.70283","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Students' learning outcomes and experiences vary depending on the learning environment, and their reinforcement relies on meeting specific innate needs. In this context, self-determination is considered a key theory that fosters students' learning experiences. The self-determination theory (SDT) has been repeatedly addressed in the literature in online, blended, and face-to-face learning environments in both research and practice contexts. Despite a significant number of existing studies, little is still known about the potential reasons for this impact of learning environments on students, from the perspective of how learning environments integrating various dynamic and interactive technologies affect students' engagement levels and meet their various needs to maintain their motivation.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>Therefore, in this study, interactive GeoGebra applets are conceptualized not only as teaching tools but also as need-supportive learning affordances that can transform how students interact with mathematical content. The instructional materials and learning activities were systematically designed in accordance with SDT to support students' autonomy, competence, and relatedness. Accordingly, the present research compares online, blended, and face-to-face learning environments, focusing particularly on how GeoGebra-supported instruction in blended and online settings differently supports psychological needs, student engagement, and learning performance.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Using a quasi-experimental design in the study, three carefully defined instructional conditions were compared: a blended learning environment supported by interactive GeoGebra applets, a fully online learning environment with the same applications, and a traditional face-to-face learning environment without such interaction. A total of 400 preliminary undergraduate students participated in the study.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results and Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>The results show that the BL setting supported by interactive GeoGebra applets, developed in line with Self-Determination Theory (SDT)-aligned teaching strategies, improves students' learning outcomes and engagement, and fulfils competence and relatedness needs, whereas autonomy satisfaction remained consistent across all instructional conditions. Findings show the promising effects of the BL environment, particularly for low-performing students. The study offers practical implications for educators and instructional designers, providing a robust framework for integrating need-supportive digital tools into mathematics curricula to enhance both cognitive and psychological outcomes.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":48071,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Computer Assisted Learning","volume":"42 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jcal.70283","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Computer Assisted Learning","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jcal.70283","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Students' learning outcomes and experiences vary depending on the learning environment, and their reinforcement relies on meeting specific innate needs. In this context, self-determination is considered a key theory that fosters students' learning experiences. The self-determination theory (SDT) has been repeatedly addressed in the literature in online, blended, and face-to-face learning environments in both research and practice contexts. Despite a significant number of existing studies, little is still known about the potential reasons for this impact of learning environments on students, from the perspective of how learning environments integrating various dynamic and interactive technologies affect students' engagement levels and meet their various needs to maintain their motivation.

Objectives

Therefore, in this study, interactive GeoGebra applets are conceptualized not only as teaching tools but also as need-supportive learning affordances that can transform how students interact with mathematical content. The instructional materials and learning activities were systematically designed in accordance with SDT to support students' autonomy, competence, and relatedness. Accordingly, the present research compares online, blended, and face-to-face learning environments, focusing particularly on how GeoGebra-supported instruction in blended and online settings differently supports psychological needs, student engagement, and learning performance.

Methods

Using a quasi-experimental design in the study, three carefully defined instructional conditions were compared: a blended learning environment supported by interactive GeoGebra applets, a fully online learning environment with the same applications, and a traditional face-to-face learning environment without such interaction. A total of 400 preliminary undergraduate students participated in the study.

Results and Conclusions

The results show that the BL setting supported by interactive GeoGebra applets, developed in line with Self-Determination Theory (SDT)-aligned teaching strategies, improves students' learning outcomes and engagement, and fulfils competence and relatedness needs, whereas autonomy satisfaction remained consistent across all instructional conditions. Findings show the promising effects of the BL environment, particularly for low-performing students. The study offers practical implications for educators and instructional designers, providing a robust framework for integrating need-supportive digital tools into mathematics curricula to enhance both cognitive and psychological outcomes.

Abstract Image

基于自我决定理论的交互式地理小程序混合学习环境中学生学习体验评价
背景学生的学习成果和体验因学习环境的不同而不同,其强化依赖于满足特定的先天需求。在这种背景下,自我决定被认为是促进学生学习经验的关键理论。自我决定理论(SDT)在研究和实践背景下的在线、混合和面对面学习环境中被反复提到。尽管已有大量的研究,但从整合各种动态和互动技术的学习环境如何影响学生的参与水平并满足他们保持学习动机的各种需求的角度来看,对学习环境对学生产生这种影响的潜在原因知之甚少。因此,在本研究中,交互式GeoGebra小程序的概念不仅是作为教学工具,而且作为需求支持学习的支持,可以改变学生与数学内容的互动方式。教学材料和学习活动是根据SDT系统设计的,以支持学生的自主性,能力和关联性。因此,本研究比较了在线、混合和面对面的学习环境,特别关注在混合和在线环境中geogebra支持的教学如何以不同的方式支持心理需求、学生参与和学习绩效。方法采用准实验设计,对三种精心定义的教学条件进行比较:由交互式GeoGebra小程序支持的混合学习环境、具有相同应用程序的完全在线学习环境和没有这种交互的传统面对面学习环境。共有400名本科预科学生参与了这项研究。结果与结论根据自我决定理论(SDT)的教学策略开发的交互式GeoGebra小程序支持的BL设置提高了学生的学习成果和参与度,满足了能力和相关性需求,而自主性满意度在所有教学条件下保持一致。研究结果显示了BL环境的良好效果,特别是对表现不佳的学生。该研究为教育工作者和教学设计师提供了实际意义,为将需求支持的数字工具整合到数学课程中提供了一个强大的框架,以提高认知和心理结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Computer Assisted Learning
Journal of Computer Assisted Learning EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
9.70
自引率
6.00%
发文量
116
期刊介绍: The Journal of Computer Assisted Learning is an international peer-reviewed journal which covers the whole range of uses of information and communication technology to support learning and knowledge exchange. It aims to provide a medium for communication among researchers as well as a channel linking researchers, practitioners, and policy makers. JCAL is also a rich source of material for master and PhD students in areas such as educational psychology, the learning sciences, instructional technology, instructional design, collaborative learning, intelligent learning systems, learning analytics, open, distance and networked learning, and educational evaluation and assessment. This is the case for formal (e.g., schools), non-formal (e.g., workplace learning) and informal learning (e.g., museums and libraries) situations and environments. Volumes often include one Special Issue which these provides readers with a broad and in-depth perspective on a specific topic. First published in 1985, JCAL continues to have the aim of making the outcomes of contemporary research and experience accessible. During this period there have been major technological advances offering new opportunities and approaches in the use of a wide range of technologies to support learning and knowledge transfer more generally. There is currently much emphasis on the use of network functionality and the challenges its appropriate uses pose to teachers/tutors working with students locally and at a distance. JCAL welcomes: -Empirical reports, single studies or programmatic series of studies on the use of computers and information technologies in learning and assessment -Critical and original meta-reviews of literature on the use of computers for learning -Empirical studies on the design and development of innovative technology-based systems for learning -Conceptual articles on issues relating to the Aims and Scope
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书