Addressing the Polycrisis With the Same Logic That Created It? A Critical Analysis of Sustainability Discourses in the EU Strategic Agendas Between 2014 and 2024

Viktor Lovén
{"title":"Addressing the Polycrisis With the Same Logic That Created It? A Critical Analysis of Sustainability Discourses in the EU Strategic Agendas Between 2014 and 2024","authors":"Viktor Lovén","doi":"10.1002/cep4.70043","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This article examines how the EU frames problems and solutions regarding the current interconnected crises of climate change, inequality and other social, economic and environmental problems. The EU's main strategic priorities are summarised in the EU Strategic Agenda, but the latest agenda was published in 2024 and has not yet been sufficiently examined or compared with its predecessors. Therefore, this article analyses the assumptions and discourses that underpin the agendas of 2014–2019, 2019–2024 and 2024–2029. It offers a critical discourse analysis informed by the sustainability trilemma and postcolonial intersectionality as a theoretical and interpretive framework, and guided by the following research question: How have sustainability discourses in the EU Strategic Agenda developed between 2014 and 2024? The analysis interprets the sustainability discourses in all agendas to be underpinned by neoliberalism, Eurocentrism, anthropocentrism and geopolitical realism, which point to an overarching logic of competition, separation and social, economic and environmental hierarchies. The agendas appear to paradoxically address the polycrisis by using tools and strategies that are underpinned by the same logic and basic assumptions that may have caused the polycrisis in the first place.</p>","PeriodicalId":100329,"journal":{"name":"Contemporary European Politics","volume":"4 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cep4.70043","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contemporary European Politics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cep4.70043","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article examines how the EU frames problems and solutions regarding the current interconnected crises of climate change, inequality and other social, economic and environmental problems. The EU's main strategic priorities are summarised in the EU Strategic Agenda, but the latest agenda was published in 2024 and has not yet been sufficiently examined or compared with its predecessors. Therefore, this article analyses the assumptions and discourses that underpin the agendas of 2014–2019, 2019–2024 and 2024–2029. It offers a critical discourse analysis informed by the sustainability trilemma and postcolonial intersectionality as a theoretical and interpretive framework, and guided by the following research question: How have sustainability discourses in the EU Strategic Agenda developed between 2014 and 2024? The analysis interprets the sustainability discourses in all agendas to be underpinned by neoliberalism, Eurocentrism, anthropocentrism and geopolitical realism, which point to an overarching logic of competition, separation and social, economic and environmental hierarchies. The agendas appear to paradoxically address the polycrisis by using tools and strategies that are underpinned by the same logic and basic assumptions that may have caused the polycrisis in the first place.

用同样的逻辑解决多重危机?2014 - 2024年欧盟战略议程中可持续性话语的批判性分析
本文探讨了欧盟如何就当前气候变化、不平等以及其他社会、经济和环境问题等相互关联的危机制定问题和解决方案。欧盟的主要战略重点在欧盟战略议程中进行了总结,但最新的议程于2024年发布,尚未经过充分的审查或与之前的议程进行比较。因此,本文分析了支撑2014-2019年、2019-2024年和2024-2029年议程的假设和话语。它提供了一个批判性话语分析,以可持续性三难困境和后殖民交织性为理论和解释框架,并以以下研究问题为指导:2014年至2024年期间欧盟战略议程中的可持续性话语是如何发展的?该分析将所有议程中的可持续性话语解释为新自由主义,欧洲中心主义,人类中心主义和地缘政治现实主义的基础,这指出了竞争,分离以及社会,经济和环境等级的总体逻辑。议程似乎矛盾地通过使用工具和策略来解决多重危机,这些工具和策略是由可能首先导致多重危机的相同逻辑和基本假设所支撑的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书