Assessing the metric reliability of NRTK-based surveying systems for multi-scale architectural documentation: experimental tests and real-world applications

IF 2.5 Q2 REMOTE SENSING
Enrico Breggion, Andrea Martino, Andrea Sattin, Francesco Guerra
{"title":"Assessing the metric reliability of NRTK-based surveying systems for multi-scale architectural documentation: experimental tests and real-world applications","authors":"Enrico Breggion,&nbsp;Andrea Martino,&nbsp;Andrea Sattin,&nbsp;Francesco Guerra","doi":"10.1007/s12518-026-00752-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Network Real-Time Kinematic (NRTK) correction services have lowered the barrier to georeferenced surveying by enabling centimetric GNSS positioning without deploying a local base station, but their “end-to-end” metric reliability in multi-sensor architectural workflows remains strongly dependent on platform-specific error source (Rizos 2002). This paper assesses the geometric consistency achievable when NRTK is used as the sole georeferencing backbone for multi-scale heritage documentation, combining a controlled benchmark with a real-world application on the survey of Villa Farsetti and its park in Santa Maria di Sala, Italy. The benchmark compares four NRTK-enabled platforms (geodetic GNSS, handheld SLAM system, UAV, and DSLR with RTK Hotshoe tagging) against a topographic reference. The field campaign replicates the same NRTK toolchain on the villa’s architectural envelope and landscape, while defining an independent reference via a static GNSS-supported control network and static terrestrial laser scanning (TLS). Quality assessment is designed around point-based check residuals, baseline/scale diagnostics, and dense cloud-to-cloud and M3C2 comparisons to TLS reference clouds (Besl and McKay 1992). The study provides a practical, reproducible validation framework to decide when NRTK-only architectures can support 1:50–1:100 deliverables and when supplementary control is still required.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":46286,"journal":{"name":"Applied Geomatics","volume":"18 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s12518-026-00752-9.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Geomatics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12518-026-00752-9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"REMOTE SENSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Network Real-Time Kinematic (NRTK) correction services have lowered the barrier to georeferenced surveying by enabling centimetric GNSS positioning without deploying a local base station, but their “end-to-end” metric reliability in multi-sensor architectural workflows remains strongly dependent on platform-specific error source (Rizos 2002). This paper assesses the geometric consistency achievable when NRTK is used as the sole georeferencing backbone for multi-scale heritage documentation, combining a controlled benchmark with a real-world application on the survey of Villa Farsetti and its park in Santa Maria di Sala, Italy. The benchmark compares four NRTK-enabled platforms (geodetic GNSS, handheld SLAM system, UAV, and DSLR with RTK Hotshoe tagging) against a topographic reference. The field campaign replicates the same NRTK toolchain on the villa’s architectural envelope and landscape, while defining an independent reference via a static GNSS-supported control network and static terrestrial laser scanning (TLS). Quality assessment is designed around point-based check residuals, baseline/scale diagnostics, and dense cloud-to-cloud and M3C2 comparisons to TLS reference clouds (Besl and McKay 1992). The study provides a practical, reproducible validation framework to decide when NRTK-only architectures can support 1:50–1:100 deliverables and when supplementary control is still required.

评估基于nrtk的测量系统的多尺度建筑文档的度量可靠性:实验测试和实际应用
网络实时运动学(NRTK)校正服务通过在不部署本地基站的情况下实现厘米GNSS定位,降低了地理参考测量的障碍,但它们在多传感器架构工作流程中的“端到端”度量可靠性仍然强烈依赖于平台特定的误差源(Rizos 2002)。本文评估了NRTK作为多尺度遗产文献的唯一地理参考主干时所能达到的几何一致性,并将控制基准与意大利圣玛丽亚迪萨拉法塞蒂别墅及其公园的实际应用相结合。基准测试将四个支持nrtk的平台(大地GNSS、手持SLAM系统、无人机和带有RTK Hotshoe标签的单反相机)与地形参考进行比较。现场活动在别墅的建筑围护结构和景观上复制了相同的NRTK工具链,同时通过静态gnss支持的控制网络和静态地面激光扫描(TLS)定义了一个独立的参考。质量评估是围绕基于点的检查残差、基线/规模诊断、密集的云到云以及与TLS参考云的M3C2比较而设计的(Besl和McKay 1992)。该研究提供了一个实用的、可重复的验证框架,以确定仅nrtk的架构何时可以支持1:50-1:100的交付成果,以及何时仍然需要补充控制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Applied Geomatics
Applied Geomatics REMOTE SENSING-
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
3.70%
发文量
61
期刊介绍: Applied Geomatics (AGMJ) is the official journal of SIFET the Italian Society of Photogrammetry and Topography and covers all aspects and information on scientific and technical advances in the geomatics sciences. The Journal publishes innovative contributions in geomatics applications ranging from the integration of instruments, methodologies and technologies and their use in the environmental sciences, engineering and other natural sciences. The areas of interest include many research fields such as: remote sensing, close range and videometric photogrammetry, image analysis, digital mapping, land and geographic information systems, geographic information science, integrated geodesy, spatial data analysis, heritage recording; network adjustment and numerical processes. Furthermore, Applied Geomatics is open to articles from all areas of deformation measurements and analysis, structural engineering, mechanical engineering and all trends in earth and planetary survey science and space technology. The Journal also contains notices of conferences and international workshops, industry news, and information on new products. It provides a useful forum for professional and academic scientists involved in geomatics science and technology. Information on Open Research Funding and Support may be found here: https://www.springernature.com/gp/open-research/institutional-agreements
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书