Changes in primary care provider behaviors after a brief educational intervention about opioid prescribing in older adults.

IF 2.9 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Alëna A Balasanova, Hongmei Wang, Jungyoon Kim, Jihyun Ma, Rebecca Hiebert, Mary Jo Spurgin, Jane Potter, Alfred L Fisher
{"title":"Changes in primary care provider behaviors after a brief educational intervention about opioid prescribing in older adults.","authors":"Alëna A Balasanova, Hongmei Wang, Jungyoon Kim, Jihyun Ma, Rebecca Hiebert, Mary Jo Spurgin, Jane Potter, Alfred L Fisher","doi":"10.1186/s12875-026-03438-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There is limited literature on educational interventions for primary care clinicians (PCC) addressing the unique considerations in opioid prescribing for older adult patients.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We aimed to evaluate self-reported knowledge, confidence, and behavior change by PCC and the degree to which respondents followed through with their intentions to implement specific clinical strategies after receiving a brief educational intervention about opioid prescribing in older adults.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Analysis of pre-, post-, and one-month follow-up surveys of PCC.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>PCC working within our institution's 13 primary care clinics.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>The brief educational training was conducted over 20 months and focused on limited benefits and unique harms of chronic opioid use in older adults, opioid use disorder screening, and harm reduction strategies.</p><p><strong>Main measures: </strong>The surveys assessed perceived knowledge and confidence in non-opioid medication options and opioid safety strategies before and after the intervention and potential use of strategies to address opioid use in their clinical practice. The one-month follow-up survey asked if participants had started implementing opioid safety strategies with patients. We also collected information on age, gender, race, ethnicity, and health professions discipline.</p><p><strong>Key results: </strong>Sixty-five PCC received the intervention and completed the immediate post-training survey. Of these, 24 also completed the one-month follow-up survey. We found increased perceived knowledge of the effectiveness of long-term opioids for chronic pain and increased confidence in suggesting non-opioid treatment options among all participants after the training. Post-training, all but one clinician planned to implement at least one of the taught opioid safety strategies. At one-month follow-up, depending on the strategy, between 10%-78% of participants had implemented their planned strategy.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings show that a brief opioid-focused educational intervention for practicing PCC is associated with increased perceived knowledge and confidence immediately after the intervention and a high likelihood of implementing some of the taught strategies one month later. These findings suggest that brief trainings may be impactful educational interventions for practicing PCC.</p>","PeriodicalId":72428,"journal":{"name":"BMC primary care","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13531884/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC primary care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12875-026-03438-8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: There is limited literature on educational interventions for primary care clinicians (PCC) addressing the unique considerations in opioid prescribing for older adult patients.

Objective: We aimed to evaluate self-reported knowledge, confidence, and behavior change by PCC and the degree to which respondents followed through with their intentions to implement specific clinical strategies after receiving a brief educational intervention about opioid prescribing in older adults.

Design: Analysis of pre-, post-, and one-month follow-up surveys of PCC.

Participants: PCC working within our institution's 13 primary care clinics.

Interventions: The brief educational training was conducted over 20 months and focused on limited benefits and unique harms of chronic opioid use in older adults, opioid use disorder screening, and harm reduction strategies.

Main measures: The surveys assessed perceived knowledge and confidence in non-opioid medication options and opioid safety strategies before and after the intervention and potential use of strategies to address opioid use in their clinical practice. The one-month follow-up survey asked if participants had started implementing opioid safety strategies with patients. We also collected information on age, gender, race, ethnicity, and health professions discipline.

Key results: Sixty-five PCC received the intervention and completed the immediate post-training survey. Of these, 24 also completed the one-month follow-up survey. We found increased perceived knowledge of the effectiveness of long-term opioids for chronic pain and increased confidence in suggesting non-opioid treatment options among all participants after the training. Post-training, all but one clinician planned to implement at least one of the taught opioid safety strategies. At one-month follow-up, depending on the strategy, between 10%-78% of participants had implemented their planned strategy.

Conclusions: Our findings show that a brief opioid-focused educational intervention for practicing PCC is associated with increased perceived knowledge and confidence immediately after the intervention and a high likelihood of implementing some of the taught strategies one month later. These findings suggest that brief trainings may be impactful educational interventions for practicing PCC.

老年人阿片类药物处方简短教育干预后初级保健提供者行为的变化
背景:关于初级保健临床医生(PCC)解决老年患者阿片类药物处方中独特考虑的教育干预的文献有限。目的:我们旨在评估PCC自我报告的知识、信心和行为改变,以及受访者在接受有关老年人阿片类药物处方的简短教育干预后贯彻实施具体临床策略的程度。设计:对PCC术前、术后和1个月随访调查进行分析。参与者:PCC在我们机构的13个初级保健诊所工作。干预措施:进行了为期20个月的简短教育培训,重点关注老年人慢性阿片类药物使用的有限益处和独特危害,阿片类药物使用障碍筛查和减少危害策略。主要措施:调查评估了干预前后对非阿片类药物选择和阿片类药物安全策略的认知知识和信心,以及在临床实践中解决阿片类药物使用的潜在策略。为期一个月的随访调查询问参与者是否开始对患者实施阿片类药物安全策略。我们还收集了年龄、性别、种族、民族和卫生专业学科的信息。关键结果:65名PCC接受了干预,并完成了培训后的即时调查。其中24人还完成了为期一个月的随访调查。我们发现,在培训后,所有参与者对长期阿片类药物治疗慢性疼痛的有效性的认知增加,对建议非阿片类药物治疗方案的信心增加。培训后,除了一名临床医生外,所有临床医生都计划实施至少一项教授的阿片类药物安全策略。在一个月的随访中,根据不同的策略,有10%-78%的参与者执行了他们计划的策略。结论:我们的研究结果表明,短暂的以阿片类药物为重点的PCC实践教育干预与干预后立即增加的感知知识和信心有关,并且一个月后实施一些教学策略的可能性很高。这些发现表明,简短的培训可能是有效的PCC实践教育干预措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书