A Multi-Model LLM Consensus Framework to Identify EHR-Predictable Eligibility Criteria in NSCLC Immunotherapy Trials.

Abdul Muqeeth, Yu Huang, Jiang Bian, Hao Liu, Yan Zhuang
{"title":"A Multi-Model LLM Consensus Framework to Identify EHR-Predictable Eligibility Criteria in NSCLC Immunotherapy Trials.","authors":"Abdul Muqeeth, Yu Huang, Jiang Bian, Hao Liu, Yan Zhuang","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Clinical trial participation in oncology remains low, with complex and granular eligibility criteria limiting timely accrual and excluding many patients who could otherwise benefit from novel therapies. We propose a structured framework that utilizes a multi-model large language model consensus pipeline to convert free-text eligibility from Phase III PD-1/PD-L1 non-small cell lung cancer trials into standardized umbrella concepts and to classify each concept into tiers of Electronic Health Record predictability. Applying this framework, we consolidated hundreds of heterogeneous eligibility traits into a manageable set of clinical concepts and found that roughly half are both clinically important and plausibly inferable from routine structured and unstructured EHR data, while the remainder either add little value to prediction or depend on specialized testing. This taxonomy provides a prioritized \"predictable target\" list for future NLP and machine-learning models and a practical blueprint for designing more computable, pragmatic eligibility criteria and EHR-driven prescreening tools.</p>","PeriodicalId":72181,"journal":{"name":"AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science","volume":"2026 ","pages":"333-342"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13274367/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Clinical trial participation in oncology remains low, with complex and granular eligibility criteria limiting timely accrual and excluding many patients who could otherwise benefit from novel therapies. We propose a structured framework that utilizes a multi-model large language model consensus pipeline to convert free-text eligibility from Phase III PD-1/PD-L1 non-small cell lung cancer trials into standardized umbrella concepts and to classify each concept into tiers of Electronic Health Record predictability. Applying this framework, we consolidated hundreds of heterogeneous eligibility traits into a manageable set of clinical concepts and found that roughly half are both clinically important and plausibly inferable from routine structured and unstructured EHR data, while the remainder either add little value to prediction or depend on specialized testing. This taxonomy provides a prioritized "predictable target" list for future NLP and machine-learning models and a practical blueprint for designing more computable, pragmatic eligibility criteria and EHR-driven prescreening tools.

确定非小细胞肺癌免疫治疗试验ehr可预测资格标准的多模型LLM共识框架
肿瘤临床试验的参与率仍然很低,复杂而精细的资格标准限制了及时的累积,并排除了许多本来可以从新疗法中受益的患者。我们提出了一个结构化框架,利用多模型大语言模型共识管道将III期PD-1/PD-L1非小细胞肺癌试验的自由文本资格转换为标准化的伞形概念,并将每个概念分类为电子健康记录可预测性的层次。应用这一框架,我们将数百个异质的合格性特征整合到一组可管理的临床概念中,发现大约一半的特征在临床上很重要,并且可以从常规的结构化和非结构化电子病历数据中合理地推断出来,而其余的要么对预测没有什么价值,要么依赖于专门的测试。该分类法为未来的NLP和机器学习模型提供了优先的“可预测目标”列表,并为设计更可计算、实用的资格标准和ehr驱动的预筛选工具提供了实用蓝图。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书