Tourniquet Pressure Magnitudes and Distribution During Limb Applications.

Q3 Medicine
Delaney A Fultz, Whitney A Shroeder, James Bryson Cox, Richard A Hester, Marc O Fridley, Cory S Hulsey, John DesJardins
{"title":"Tourniquet Pressure Magnitudes and Distribution During Limb Applications.","authors":"Delaney A Fultz, Whitney A Shroeder, James Bryson Cox, Richard A Hester, Marc O Fridley, Cory S Hulsey, John DesJardins","doi":"10.55460/J.Spec.Oper.Med.2026.BYA5-RH3Y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Effective limb hemorrhage control depends on understanding how tourniquet pressure develops and is maintained. Prior work has emphasized overall occlusion pressure rather than pressure distribution, which influences tissue safety and device performance. This study examined SOF™ Gen 5 tourniquet pressure distribution and torque during key phases of tourniquet use.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Tourniquets were self-applied by novice participants on the upper arm and professionally applied on the thigh for 60 seconds.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All 34 applications (n=17) achieved and maintained arterial occlusion; four arm applications reached occlusion, but could not secure the windlass rod. Median occlusion pressures were ~320mmHg (upper arm, 260.68mmHg; thigh, 335.56mmHg). Pressure decreased minimally during securement (upper arm, 314.24mmHg; thigh, 343.88mmHg) and pre-release (upper arm, 297.80mmHg; thigh, 340.88mmHg). Pressure distribution across the 3.8cm tourniquet width (upper arm P=.305; thigh P=.428) showed a \"bell-shaped\" pattern with approximately 15% lower edge pressures than central pressures. Median windlass rod occlusion torque was 2.50Nm for upper arm applications and 3.31Nm for thigh applications, substantially lower than the participant maximum hand torque (median 10.70Nm).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study described a human-limb method to characterize emergency-use tourniquet pressure distribution and torque behavior.</p>","PeriodicalId":53630,"journal":{"name":"Journal of special operations medicine : a peer reviewed journal for SOF medical professionals","volume":" ","pages":"61-69"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of special operations medicine : a peer reviewed journal for SOF medical professionals","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55460/J.Spec.Oper.Med.2026.BYA5-RH3Y","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Effective limb hemorrhage control depends on understanding how tourniquet pressure develops and is maintained. Prior work has emphasized overall occlusion pressure rather than pressure distribution, which influences tissue safety and device performance. This study examined SOF™ Gen 5 tourniquet pressure distribution and torque during key phases of tourniquet use.

Methods: Tourniquets were self-applied by novice participants on the upper arm and professionally applied on the thigh for 60 seconds.

Results: All 34 applications (n=17) achieved and maintained arterial occlusion; four arm applications reached occlusion, but could not secure the windlass rod. Median occlusion pressures were ~320mmHg (upper arm, 260.68mmHg; thigh, 335.56mmHg). Pressure decreased minimally during securement (upper arm, 314.24mmHg; thigh, 343.88mmHg) and pre-release (upper arm, 297.80mmHg; thigh, 340.88mmHg). Pressure distribution across the 3.8cm tourniquet width (upper arm P=.305; thigh P=.428) showed a "bell-shaped" pattern with approximately 15% lower edge pressures than central pressures. Median windlass rod occlusion torque was 2.50Nm for upper arm applications and 3.31Nm for thigh applications, substantially lower than the participant maximum hand torque (median 10.70Nm).

Conclusion: This study described a human-limb method to characterize emergency-use tourniquet pressure distribution and torque behavior.

止血带在肢体应用过程中的压力大小和分布。
背景:有效的肢体出血控制取决于了解止血带压力的形成和维持。先前的工作强调整体咬合压力而不是压力分布,影响组织安全和器械性能。本研究检测了SOF™Gen 5止血带在使用关键阶段的压力分布和扭矩。方法:新手自行在上臂敷止血带,专业人员在大腿敷60秒。结果:所有34例患者(n=17)均达到并维持动脉闭塞;4个臂的应用达到闭塞,但不能固定起锚杆。中位闭塞压约320mmHg(上臂2600.68 mmhg,大腿335.56mmHg)。在固定期间(上臂,314.24mmHg;大腿,343.88mmHg)和预释放期间(上臂,297.80mmHg;大腿,340.88mmHg)血压下降最小。3.8cm止血带宽度上的压力分布(上臂P= 0.305;大腿P= 0.428)呈“钟形”模式,边缘压力比中心压力低约15%。上臂应用的中位卷扬机棒闭塞扭矩为2.50Nm,大腿应用的中位卷扬机棒闭塞扭矩为3.31Nm,大大低于参与者的最大手扭矩(中位10.70Nm)。结论:本研究描述了一种人体肢体方法来表征紧急使用止血带的压力分布和扭矩行为。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
91
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书