'They're waiting for us to break before they listen': healthcare workers' perspectives on how to mitigate moral distress in British Columbia, Canada.

IF 1.7
Muhammad Haaris Tiwana, Alice Murage, Jorges Andres Delgado-Ron, Rosemary Morgan, Julia Smith
{"title":"'They're waiting for us to break before they listen': healthcare workers' perspectives on how to mitigate moral distress in British Columbia, Canada.","authors":"Muhammad Haaris Tiwana, Alice Murage, Jorges Andres Delgado-Ron, Rosemary Morgan, Julia Smith","doi":"10.1017/S1463423626101352","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Moral distress among healthcare workers can have serious repercussions, including reduced morale, decreased quality of care, apathy, burnout, and workforce attrition. While much research has documented moral distress, few studies have considered how to effectively mitigate it. This study sought to enhance understanding of moral distress by exploring not only who is affected and why, but also examining strategies for addressing it.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An online survey was conducted with primary care healthcare professionals in British Columbia, Canada, from October to December 2022, including physicians, nurses, homecare aides, and long-term care aides. The survey gathered sociodemographic data, documented experiences of moral distress, and explored methods used to mitigate it. We specifically analysed responses to two open-ended questions on how respondents addressed moral distress, categorizing responses by profession, gender, and racial identity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Employing a socio-ecological framework, we organized mitigation strategies across four levels: individual, interpersonal, community/organizational, and societal/systemic. Strategies ranged from personal coping mechanisms - such as mindfulness and exercise - to more collective actions aimed at changing workplace culture and policies. At the organizational and systemic levels, participants offered recommendations for structural reforms to improve support for healthcare staff.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study highlights the multifactorial nature of moral distress, showing that it arises from a complex interplay of systemic, organizational, interpersonal, and individual factors. Our findings emphasize the importance of developing multi-level approaches to mitigate moral distress in healthcare, addressing both immediate individual needs and broader organizational and policy changes that promote a healthier work environment.</p>","PeriodicalId":74493,"journal":{"name":"Primary health care research & development","volume":"27 ","pages":"e68"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13280596/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Primary health care research & development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S1463423626101352","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Moral distress among healthcare workers can have serious repercussions, including reduced morale, decreased quality of care, apathy, burnout, and workforce attrition. While much research has documented moral distress, few studies have considered how to effectively mitigate it. This study sought to enhance understanding of moral distress by exploring not only who is affected and why, but also examining strategies for addressing it.

Methods: An online survey was conducted with primary care healthcare professionals in British Columbia, Canada, from October to December 2022, including physicians, nurses, homecare aides, and long-term care aides. The survey gathered sociodemographic data, documented experiences of moral distress, and explored methods used to mitigate it. We specifically analysed responses to two open-ended questions on how respondents addressed moral distress, categorizing responses by profession, gender, and racial identity.

Results: Employing a socio-ecological framework, we organized mitigation strategies across four levels: individual, interpersonal, community/organizational, and societal/systemic. Strategies ranged from personal coping mechanisms - such as mindfulness and exercise - to more collective actions aimed at changing workplace culture and policies. At the organizational and systemic levels, participants offered recommendations for structural reforms to improve support for healthcare staff.

Conclusion: This study highlights the multifactorial nature of moral distress, showing that it arises from a complex interplay of systemic, organizational, interpersonal, and individual factors. Our findings emphasize the importance of developing multi-level approaches to mitigate moral distress in healthcare, addressing both immediate individual needs and broader organizational and policy changes that promote a healthier work environment.

“他们等着我们崩溃才会倾听”:加拿大不列颠哥伦比亚省医护人员对如何减轻道德困扰的看法。
目的:卫生保健工作者的道德困扰可能会产生严重的影响,包括士气低落、护理质量下降、冷漠、倦怠和劳动力流失。虽然很多研究都记录了道德困扰,但很少有研究考虑如何有效地减轻它。这项研究不仅探讨了谁受到了影响,为什么受到影响,而且还研究了解决道德困境的策略,从而加强了对道德困境的理解。方法:于2022年10月至12月对加拿大不列颠哥伦比亚省的初级保健保健专业人员进行在线调查,包括医生、护士、家庭护理助理和长期护理助理。该调查收集了社会人口统计数据,记录了道德困扰的经历,并探讨了减轻道德困扰的方法。我们特别分析了受访者如何处理道德困境的两个开放式问题的回答,并按职业、性别和种族身份对回答进行了分类。结果:采用社会生态框架,我们组织了四个层面的缓解策略:个人、人际、社区/组织和社会/系统。策略包括从个人应对机制(如正念和锻炼)到旨在改变工作场所文化和政策的更多集体行动。在组织和系统两级,与会者提出了结构性改革建议,以改善对保健工作人员的支持。结论:本研究强调了道德困扰的多因素性质,表明它源于系统、组织、人际和个人因素的复杂相互作用。我们的研究结果强调了开发多层次方法来减轻医疗保健中的道德困扰的重要性,既解决了个人的直接需求,也解决了促进更健康工作环境的更广泛的组织和政策变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书